From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3A1834A3DC; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 18:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762971336; cv=none; b=XJUCqkwpZMzmqAZ+siLU1sl0RJXzq6be8VM4B7ZXZHwD/Wg+5nxRLHnJX5/WUdAf5SDwQThEnr8yvSMNc+ntAdDfeaClm6JnxLbeXrDNtf0V5LEER0FXs0h/pt1sN8uWXGGtCL9gXU4PHDyg4CnQzcWMRBYzzO5A13S2G/MTkp4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762971336; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tDQjRfRHg/5gsMi9po5jTzVCTnAOh7iwpLl14QyVj94=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PnVWWQIlLlSvUkDoxqPkF2hlCxoEadXdus3U0wLbU3ObI95F7yS2NrMGAWHnJlG2UV8MAaEFsj7FayV6iuf1zGyzwpSNL/byj4QWXSTFJL0ABU4j1JLCCzP0c4/6nlAhkx7UmPcSrtdBirYOpQ9U/+P5zcKCyKpWJL+MQP0FGqQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4d6BQT0LBXzHnGkR; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 02:15:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.214.146.113]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 857E11400D9; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 02:15:32 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.15) by dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.214.146.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.36; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 18:15:31 +0000 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 18:15:30 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Marc Zyngier CC: , , , Thomas Gleixner , "Mark Rutland" , Will Deacon , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , "Saravana Kannan" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sven Peter , Janne Grunau , Suzuki K Poulose , James Clark , Jinjie Ruan , "Alexandru Elisei" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/26] genirq: Update request_percpu_nmi() to take an affinity Message-ID: <20251112181530.000008bd@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20251020122944.3074811-16-maz@kernel.org> References: <20251020122944.3074811-1-maz@kernel.org> <20251020122944.3074811-16-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500011.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.215) To dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.214.146.113) On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 13:29:32 +0100 Marc Zyngier wrote: > Continue spreading the notion of affinity to the percpu interrupt > request code by updating the call sites that use request_percpu_nmi() > (all two of them) to take an affinity pointer. This pointer is > firmly NULL for now. > > Tested-by: Will Deacon > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron