From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 789F813A258; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 23:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763077649; cv=none; b=IAfShb0N9eBzJmn+F2ckBLmaOuanhWbLpMBote3xTgv7ubrH1gJ+6SWclSWimFXm8JIApvND0pdZRAHijfCGfqyfoRgQo1BTTcvNjbsG7mwkOj5tbGawU0c/tRwjH4SBlR8Gt5L5pqhRYuw8vOs+MtE18qxSuictS8HEDNzkHJo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763077649; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Y0Rj4ZRe5ERECMPOL/Tf/uw4avMT1HmU7UJTbesrIqc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=B7n/Ao/PvbPWX/GbSexx81oysdALIWC/shL38BXPf0LGtXFSpdCT88xdWBYjO5bOg4XgglNyVv9dbQGZMGyWIVWxlg26WV7rL1PX8vhhbAsUADGFSHquzoeTtgHx5WUzWAa5/IDYsy/5cuN5XEoWvtry50DJZO0EaPx31r8Z6xI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Triv6O5Y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Triv6O5Y" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1763077647; x=1794613647; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Y0Rj4ZRe5ERECMPOL/Tf/uw4avMT1HmU7UJTbesrIqc=; b=Triv6O5YyhEuDtftxm6vCYHXXjk8ZN3FtuAn3ElBBa45iSMSxx+8K6x/ /erXCAJ6Ohuv/L6ofnnhO++IN3RwEqfdkjd/AsQXXkFIk9GYmzMos5/t6 eaSShOF+VsdJmqPZJRFCGda0msFGqyp1d/y13JljQJ7wQOfs0SpSmr+HF xoxicZcfi1w7oAIjUfzwmJfZEem9tthdYR1pB5hbGbM3BX84wCaZ83EJN pQtgTn1uE0YDdktsRUch0cO5KCu4sOi8woj4fQ90QHwrlsFGdZRwBSsrj h9FBcw2l4vqeS5SnKP5OmB8W6vbudkCRQ0I4hi1SECX5YeebGzE2OkURK Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Ki4wgjdnSg+2PsWR45StnQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: S888nDTyRquS/ehiMQWm/w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11612"; a="87816449" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,303,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="87816449" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Nov 2025 15:47:26 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Dq9YV3/3QBC9a11GdiOapg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: nXbXL0z/T6OqbjgYjMo1qQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,303,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="189267507" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 7b01c990427b) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2025 15:47:21 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 7b01c990427b with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vJh27-0005zX-2L; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 23:47:19 +0000 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:46:40 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Yuntao Wang , Rob Herring , Saravana Kannan Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Geert Uytterhoeven , Catalin Marinas , AKASHI Takahiro , James Morse , Chen Zhou , Baoquan He , Zhen Lei , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List , Changyuan Lyu , Alexander Graf , "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuntao Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] of/reserved_mem: Use dt_root_addr_size_bytes() instead of open-coding it Message-ID: <202511140700.auD70FDr-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251112143520.233870-5-yuntao.wang@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251112143520.233870-5-yuntao.wang@linux.dev> Hi Yuntao, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.18-rc5 next-20251113] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yuntao-Wang/of-fdt-Introduce-dt_root_addr_size_cells-and-dt_root_addr_size_bytes/20251112-232000 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251112143520.233870-5-yuntao.wang%40linux.dev patch subject: [PATCH 04/10] of/reserved_mem: Use dt_root_addr_size_bytes() instead of open-coding it config: i386-randconfig-011-20251114 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251114/202511140700.auD70FDr-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.4.0-5) 12.4.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251114/202511140700.auD70FDr-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511140700.auD70FDr-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): >> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: dt_root_addr_size_bytes+0x1 (section: .text) -> dt_root_size_cells (section: .init.data) >> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: dt_root_addr_size_bytes+0x7 (section: .text) -> dt_root_addr_cells (section: .init.data) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki