Re: [PATCH v7 00/31] context_tracking,x86: Defer some IPIs until a user->kernel transition

Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-14T20:06:37Z

On Fri, Nov 14 2025 at 10:45, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> But I did that test on a machine that would absolutely benefit from
> the IPI suppression that the OP is talking about here, and I think it
> would be really quite nice if a default distro kernel with a more or
> less default distribution could be easily convinced to run a user
> thread without interrupting it. It's a little bit had that NO_HZ_FULL
> is still an exotic non-default thing, IMO.

Feel free to help with getting it over the finish line. Feeling sad/bad
(or whatever you wanted to say with 'had') does not change anything as
you should know :)

Thanks,

tglx