Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] btrfs: add fscrypt support, PART 1

David Sterba
2025-11-19T12:16:53Z

On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 05:08:37PM +0100, Daniel Vacek wrote:
> This is a revive of former work [1] of Omar, Sweet Tea and Josef to bring
> native encryption support to btrfs.
>
> It will come in more parts. The first part this time is splitting the simple
> and isolated stuff out first to reduce the size of the final patchset.
>
> Changes:
> * v8 - Clean my mistakenly added Signed-off-by:
> * v7 - Drop the checksum patch for now. It will make more sense later.
> - Drop the btrfs/330 fix. It seems no longer needed after the years.
> * v6 vs v5 [1] is mostly rebase to the latest for-next and cleaning up the
> conflicts.
>
> The remaining part needs further cleanup and a bit of redesign and it will
> follow later.

Thanks, I've added it to for-next with the following note:

Note: The patch was taken from v5 of fscrypt patchset
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1706116485.git.josef@toxicpanda.com/)
which was handled over time by various people: Omar
Sandoval, Sweet Tea Dorminy, Josef Bacik.

And added your signed-off as you're submitting it.