Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] btrfs: add fscrypt support, PART 1

Daniel Vacek
2025-11-19T14:10:06Z

On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 at 13:16, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 05:08:37PM +0100, Daniel Vacek wrote:
> > This is a revive of former work [1] of Omar, Sweet Tea and Josef to bring
> > native encryption support to btrfs.
> >
> > It will come in more parts. The first part this time is splitting the simple
> > and isolated stuff out first to reduce the size of the final patchset.
> >
> > Changes:
> > * v8 - Clean my mistakenly added Signed-off-by:
> > * v7 - Drop the checksum patch for now. It will make more sense later.
> > - Drop the btrfs/330 fix. It seems no longer needed after the years.
> > * v6 vs v5 [1] is mostly rebase to the latest for-next and cleaning up the
> > conflicts.
> >
> > The remaining part needs further cleanup and a bit of redesign and it will
> > follow later.
>
> Thanks, I've added it to for-next with the following note:
>
> Note: The patch was taken from v5 of fscrypt patchset
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1706116485.git.josef@toxicpanda.com/)
> which was handled over time by various people: Omar
> Sandoval, Sweet Tea Dorminy, Josef Bacik.
>
> And added your signed-off as you're submitting it.

Thanks. I'll do the same with the rest of the series.