From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7963633DED7; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 13:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763557296; cv=none; b=IiLpYBoEIhGlhQ7QqZLmBHTq0YES1v9xb0hrCaLXZqGhhufEvvtb7bYT/yK+oZLH2LSHr8OVyEBeXTA/flAiHRNrkO4UhisjGijgGssFdM+zX8rUTWsatWDyzg1tZwsz6BbyRxsY99aRnafxEgyV82f5BoBCH1I9MDD9IyF03hc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763557296; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N9729XdX1GMG7PWym9AGKkRBjiK24gsCrzNwmG8ZX34=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aDj0xIKgpurNULT82Wtdry4bP/OQDvP1QgApkKi1b9QqpyaPEha/pkRmR66OehiwVmJ/hiqcd4sPVmB8Wj0Uqp+GWktWlZo9ISDriCwLPmwc6kUw0BSs1eU09M49u7vP1kJcVfDAvba4h/4ltdw9ecavxADsa/vAWvZ2Rfds8JA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JC0lCE8A; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JC0lCE8A" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B84EC2BCC7; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 13:01:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763557295; bh=N9729XdX1GMG7PWym9AGKkRBjiK24gsCrzNwmG8ZX34=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JC0lCE8Av32yp0MwkzMsAmnPjGx1Sl2hHhjxXN3Yp4SGDnkxq12gLJI8aGZgy1Kkn p+5MD0xs46BvdEPiejp354vFYHF5LzFthbu4tH97BqBwN4GtXK/ZF4YkxbHtnvZa/I 3XEYiPaAGilVdHQdoCaftW5W/6tlTCLugZhAtUf/9zDLFHISBxhlx6OIlh6hD6/Ean tUb7JVUpTHtYUc+Z/7ieMeMlVXjAeEIVIHBJqwBwZAhaw8i08zR0MDFhoUrRSoWhBc HhtUqglXWVoPlOWORtj5Au5Cv5gFAT8RnCATPKoxHWKj6Fg3U05TSDFCtdU5UATTQt Ah4aw9X/woviQ== Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 13:01:30 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the mfd tree Message-ID: <20251119130130.GS1949330@google.com> References: <20251114144243.05facfce@canb.auug.org.au> <20251118183319.GR1949330@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, 19 Nov 2025, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 at 19:33, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2025, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > The following commit is also in the pmdomain tree as a different commit > > > (but the same patch): > > > > > > 30ed024fb076 ("mfd: bcm2835-pm: Add support for BCM2712") > > > > > > This is commit > > > > > > 060d111e8a56 ("mfd: bcm2835-pm: Add support for BCM2712") > > > > > > in the pmdolain tree. > > > > Why is this in the pmdomain tree, Ulf? > > The corresponding dt doc patch is in my tree too, so to keep them > together, but also because Florian acked/suggested it to me [1]. Neither of you should be deciding the fate of MFD patches. :) > I can rebase and drop it from my tree, if you prefer to take it via > your tree? The DT doc patch is however on an immutable branch just > named "dt", so you need to pull that in that case. Please let me know > and sorry for the mess! Yes, if you can drop the MFD commit, it would solve some issues. Thanks buddy. Hope that you're well. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]