From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: phy: Initialize struct usb_phy list_head
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 15:09:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025112139-resale-upward-3366@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251113-diogo-smaug_typec-v1-1-f1aa3b48620d@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 02:59:06PM +0000, Diogo Ivo wrote:
> When executing usb_add_phy() and usb_add_phy_dev() it is possible that
> usb_add_extcon() fails (for example with -EPROBE_DEFER), in which case
> the usb_phy does not get added to phy_list via
> list_add_tail(&x->head, phy_list).
>
> Then, when the driver that tried to add the phy receives the error
> propagated from usb_add_extcon() and calls into usb_remove_phy() to
> undo the partial registration there will be an unconditional call to
> list_del(&x->head) which is notinitialized and leads to a NULL pointer
> dereference.
>
> Fix this by initializing x->head before usb_add_extcon() has a chance to
> fail.
>
> Fixes: 7d21114dc6a2d53 ("usb: phy: Introduce one extcon device into usb phy")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
> ---
> drivers/usb/phy/phy.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c
> index e1435bc59662..5a9b9353f343 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c
> @@ -646,6 +646,8 @@ int usb_add_phy(struct usb_phy *x, enum usb_phy_type type)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&x->head);
> +
> usb_charger_init(x);
> ret = usb_add_extcon(x);
> if (ret)
> @@ -696,6 +698,8 @@ int usb_add_phy_dev(struct usb_phy *x)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&x->head);
> +
> usb_charger_init(x);
> ret = usb_add_extcon(x);
> if (ret)
>
Shouldn't you be also removing an existing call to INIT_LIST_HEAD()
somewhere? This is not "moving" the code, it is adding it.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-21 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-13 14:59 [PATCH] usb: phy: Initialize struct usb_phy list_head Diogo Ivo
2025-11-21 14:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-11-21 14:55 ` Diogo Ivo
2025-11-21 15:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-11-21 16:39 ` Diogo Ivo
2025-11-21 16:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-11-21 17:03 ` Diogo Ivo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025112139-resale-upward-3366@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=diogo.ivo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt \
--cc=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox