From: Ankit Khushwaha <ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
andrealmeid@igalia.com, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Ankit Khushwaha <ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] selftests/futex: Remove static keyword from 'head'
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:43:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251125051333.17934-1-ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=y, Size: 1773 bytes --]
'head' is defined as 'static struct robust_list_head' that stores the
local variable of 'struct lock_struct a' raising the Wdangling-pointer
warning.
robust_list.c: In function ‘child_circular_list’:
robust_list.c:522:24: warning: storing the address of local variable
‘a’ in ‘head.list.next’ [-Wdangling-pointer=]
522 | head.list.next = &a.list;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
robust_list.c:513:28: note: ‘a’ declared here
513 | struct lock_struct a, b, c;
| ^
robust_list.c:512:40: note: ‘head’ declared here
512 | static struct robust_list_head head;
| ^~~~
Since 'head' doesn't need static storge duration, removing the static
keyword of it to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Khushwaha <ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com>
---
v3:
Updated the patch name and msg as suggested by André.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251118170907.108832-1-ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com/
Added changes suggested by André.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251118162619.50586-1-ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com/
---
tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
index e7d1254e18ca..ef21a7ec9def 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ TEST(test_robust_list_multiple_elements)
static int child_circular_list(void *arg)
{
- static struct robust_list_head head;
+ struct robust_list_head head;
struct lock_struct a, b, c;
int ret;
--
2.52.0
reply other threads:[~2025-11-25 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251125051333.17934-1-ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com \
--to=ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox