From: david laight <david.laight@runbox.com>
To: Helge Deller <deller@kernel.org>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] apparmor unaligned memory fixes
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 21:23:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251126212309.5b21edca@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aScY13MEBATreotz@carbonx1>
On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 16:12:23 +0100
Helge Deller <deller@kernel.org> wrote:
> * david laight <david.laight@runbox.com>:
> > On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 12:03:03 +0100
> > Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/26/25 11:44, david laight wrote:
> > ...
> > > >> diff --git a/security/apparmor/match.c b/security/apparmor/match.c
> > > >> index 26e82ba879d44..3dcc342337aca 100644
> > > >> --- a/security/apparmor/match.c
> > > >> +++ b/security/apparmor/match.c
> > > >> @@ -71,10 +71,10 @@ static struct table_header *unpack_table(char *blob, size_t bsize)
> > > >> u8, u8, byte_to_byte);
> > > >
> > > > Is that that just memcpy() ?
> > >
> > > No, it's memcpy() only on big-endian machines.
> >
> > You've misread the quoting...
> > The 'data8' case that was only half there is a memcpy().
> >
> > > On little-endian machines it converts from big-endian
> > > 16/32-bit ints to little-endian 16/32-bit ints.
> > >
> > > But I see some potential for optimization here:
> > > a) on big-endian machines just use memcpy()
> >
> > true
> >
> > > b) on little-endian machines use memcpy() to copy from possibly-unaligned
> > > memory to then known-to-be-aligned destination. Then use a loop with
> > > be32_to_cpu() instead of get_unaligned_xx() as it's faster.
> >
> > There is a function that does a loop byteswap of a buffer - no reason
> > to re-invent it.
>
> I assumed there must be something, but I did not see it. Which one?
I can't find it either - just some functions to do an in-place swap.
(Which aren't usually a good idea)
>
> > But I doubt it is always (if ever) faster to do a copy and then byteswap.
> > The loop control and extra memory accesses kill performance.
>
> Yes, you are probably right.
>
> > Not that I've seen a fast get_unaligned() - I don't think gcc or clang
> > generate optimal code - For LE I think it is something like:
> > low = *(addr & ~3);
> > high = *((addr + 3) & ~3);
> > shift = (addr & 3) * 8;
> > value = low << shift | high >> (32 - shift);
> > Note that it is only 2 aligned memory reads - even for 64bit.
>
> Ok, then maybe we should keep it simple like this patch:
>
> [PATCH v2] apparmor: Optimize table creation from possibly unaligned memory
>
> Source blob may come from userspace and might be unaligned.
> Try to optize the copying process by avoiding unaligned memory accesses.
Not sure that reads right.
'Allow for misaligned data from userspace when byteswapping source blob' ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/match.h b/security/apparmor/include/match.h
> index 1fbe82f5021b..386da2023d50 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/include/match.h
> +++ b/security/apparmor/include/match.h
> @@ -104,16 +104,20 @@ struct aa_dfa {
> struct table_header *tables[YYTD_ID_TSIZE];
> };
>
> -#define byte_to_byte(X) (X)
> +#define byte_to_byte(X) (*(X))
It's a bit of a shame you need something for the above...
David
>
> #define UNPACK_ARRAY(TABLE, BLOB, LEN, TTYPE, BTYPE, NTOHX) \
> do { \
> typeof(LEN) __i; \
> TTYPE *__t = (TTYPE *) TABLE; \
> BTYPE *__b = (BTYPE *) BLOB; \
> - for (__i = 0; __i < LEN; __i++) { \
> - __t[__i] = NTOHX(__b[__i]); \
> - } \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(TTYPE) != sizeof(BTYPE)); \
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN) || sizeof(BTYPE) == 1) \
> + memcpy(__t, __b, (LEN) * sizeof(BTYPE)); \
> + else /* copy & convert convert from big-endian */ \
> + for (__i = 0; __i < LEN; __i++) { \
> + __t[__i] = NTOHX(&__b[__i]); \
> + } \
> } while (0)
>
> static inline size_t table_size(size_t len, size_t el_size)
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/match.c b/security/apparmor/match.c
> index c5a91600842a..13e2f6873329 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/match.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/match.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/kref.h>
> +#include <linux/unaligned.h>
>
> #include "include/lib.h"
> #include "include/match.h"
> @@ -70,10 +71,10 @@ static struct table_header *unpack_table(char *blob, size_t bsize)
> u8, u8, byte_to_byte);
> else if (th.td_flags == YYTD_DATA16)
> UNPACK_ARRAY(table->td_data, blob, th.td_lolen,
> - u16, __be16, be16_to_cpu);
> + u16, __be16, get_unaligned_be16);
> else if (th.td_flags == YYTD_DATA32)
> UNPACK_ARRAY(table->td_data, blob, th.td_lolen,
> - u32, __be32, be32_to_cpu);
> + u32, __be32, get_unaligned_be32);
> else
> goto fail;
> /* if table was vmalloced make sure the page tables are synced
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-26 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-31 15:08 [PATCH 0/2] apparmor unaligned memory fixes deller
2025-05-31 15:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] apparmor: Fix 8-byte alignment for initial dfa blob streams deller
2025-05-31 15:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] apparmor: Fix unaligned memory accesses in KUnit test deller
2025-11-18 9:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] apparmor unaligned memory fixes John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-11-18 11:09 ` Helge Deller
2025-11-18 11:43 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-11-18 12:49 ` Helge Deller
2025-11-23 2:08 ` John Johansen
2025-11-25 15:11 ` Helge Deller
2025-11-25 19:20 ` John Johansen
2025-11-25 21:13 ` Helge Deller
2025-11-26 9:11 ` John Johansen
2025-11-26 10:44 ` david laight
2025-11-26 11:03 ` Helge Deller
2025-11-26 11:31 ` Helge Deller
2025-11-26 16:16 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-11-26 16:58 ` Helge Deller
2025-11-26 17:26 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-11-26 14:22 ` david laight
2025-11-26 15:12 ` Helge Deller
2025-11-26 19:33 ` John Johansen
2025-11-26 20:15 ` Helge Deller
2025-11-26 21:10 ` John Johansen
2025-11-27 9:25 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-11-27 9:43 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-11-28 9:54 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-11-26 21:23 ` david laight [this message]
2025-11-26 22:18 ` John Johansen
2025-11-26 19:22 ` John Johansen
2025-11-26 7:27 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-11-26 7:52 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251126212309.5b21edca@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight@runbox.com \
--cc=apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=deller@kernel.org \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox