From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35D4527AC31; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 13:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764250803; cv=none; b=FB8Mc0LWlQH0SJSqmY7XMYQztdqLF810Kk7sQ5qMDsb+nTx0mdrxgEIB3mlc8jwJsooXj6GY2pfwIJu5I+Y8VpeiIOVDHretpw5XDUqJvq3VlVAKHDiPCv29g6wFjV82hJg58jx4kORkelAm+Q6CjEydWbmXfSAA+mGYYKUuGe8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764250803; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aG0iYC3YuyZZV8qJLeUzIEdngRz+uDOzDnLzug2Edw0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=o5dVayF18CUIbW6XyBTP1xBGa0Bc07+Ee22R/Eefr2ybzgyFaj1Ijb2SIqIi5fKY42h08wLrBCtSniC4D5xQV9c4HiY2eXbNvEj+EzqktKkBMGdPDsxDdAM7G9XLJcHnIIfDSR/D3BJrBXLEMjR6BQY96KgtPit5gz1zp196ojU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=rEymH9fR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="rEymH9fR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6ACDFC4CEF8; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 13:40:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1764250802; bh=aG0iYC3YuyZZV8qJLeUzIEdngRz+uDOzDnLzug2Edw0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rEymH9fRTZJ9RWIkTkT0wUeaxU9O24CiD36mWcVpSPvF6R7JEJQrycuXxOQpM9Smq frvPlMXyxyRSLZW91XDmGjZ2GKhJJ9JBmaa+mZ6ThprTytimakvX/tlesNUDmSdnLz 53AtUeYUPH4XYWtv1wxsHDwqUEhLADvhsHQJ/sUs= Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 14:39:55 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Zheng Qixing Cc: cve@kernel.org, linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai@fnnas.com, ming.lei@redhat.com, Nilay Shroff , "zhangyi (F)" , yangerkun , Hou Tao Subject: Re: CVE-2025-40146: blk-mq: fix potential deadlock while nr_requests grown Message-ID: <2025112730-semicolon-verse-164a@gregkh> References: <2025111256-CVE-2025-40146-b919@gregkh> <15fb6eed-e107-4ef7-a569-3328a02e2c39@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <15fb6eed-e107-4ef7-a569-3328a02e2c39@huaweicloud.com> On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 09:22:42PM +0800, Zheng Qixing wrote: > Hi, > > Commit b86433721f46 ("blk-mq: fix potential deadlock while nr_requests > grown")  aims to avoid a deadlock issue when the queue is frozen and memory > reclaim is triggered. > > However, the sysfs nr_requests update path is already under a > memalloc_noio_save() region while the queue is frozen (via > blk_mq_freeze_queue()). Did the lockdep splat in https://lore.kernel.org/all/0659ea8d-a463-47c8-9180-43c719e106eb@linux.ibm.com/ not describe the issue here that the commit is attempting to solve? thanks, greg k-h