Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched: Change rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain() to rcu-sched

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 11:57:23AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 04:39:46PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > By changing rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain() to use
> > rcu_dereference_sched_check() it also considers preempt_disable() to
> > be equivalent to rcu_read_lock().
> > 
> > Since rcu fully implies rcu_sched this has absolutely no change in
> > behaviour, but it does allow removing a bunch of otherwise redundant
> > rcu_read_lock() noise.
> 
> This goes sideways with NUMABALANCING=y, it needs a little more. I'll
> have a poke.

Bah, so I overlooked that rcu_dereference_sched() checks
rcu_sched_lock_map while rcu_dereference() checks rcu_lock_map.

Paul, with RCU being unified, how much sense does it make that the rcu
validation stuff is still fully separated?

Case at hand, I'm trying to remove a bunch of
rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() noise from deep inside the scheduler
where I know IRQs are disabled.

But the rcu checking thing is still living in the separated universe and
giving me pain.