public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: syzbot <syzbot+b74150fd2ef40e716ca2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Forwarded: [PATCH] ipc/mqueue: fix dentry refcount imbalance in prepare_open()
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2025 07:30:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251130073017.GS3538@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <692bee1c.a70a0220.d98e3.0167.GAE@google.com>

On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 11:11:24PM -0800, syzbot wrote:

> When opening an existing message queue, prepare_open() does not increment
> the dentry refcount, but end_creating() always calls dput(). This causes
> a refcount imbalance that triggers a WARN_ON_ONCE in fast_dput() when the
> file is later closed.

That makes no sense.

> --- a/ipc/mqueue.c
> +++ b/ipc/mqueue.c
> @@ -883,6 +883,7 @@ static int prepare_open(struct dentry *dentry, int oflag, int ro,
>  	if ((oflag & O_ACCMODE) == (O_RDWR | O_WRONLY))
>  		return -EINVAL;

... we return an error without refcount increment.

>  	acc = oflag2acc[oflag & O_ACCMODE];
> +	dget(dentry);
>  	return inode_permission(&nop_mnt_idmap, d_inode(dentry), acc);

... with possibly return an error *with* refcount increment.
How the caller is supposed to tell one from another?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-30  7:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-29 13:05 [syzbot] [overlayfs?] WARNING in fast_dput syzbot
2025-11-29 21:58 ` Hillf Danton
2025-11-29 22:18   ` syzbot
2025-11-30  7:11 ` Forwarded: [PATCH] ipc/mqueue: fix dentry refcount imbalance in prepare_open() syzbot
2025-11-30  7:30   ` Al Viro [this message]
2025-11-30  8:46     ` Al Viro
2025-11-30  9:10       ` Al Viro
2025-11-30 10:52 ` [syzbot] [overlayfs?] WARNING in fast_dput Hillf Danton
2025-11-30 11:41   ` syzbot
2025-12-01  8:58 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-12-01  9:06   ` Al Viro
2025-12-01  9:07   ` Aleksandr Nogikh
2025-12-01 11:05     ` Amir Goldstein
2025-12-01 11:07       ` Aleksandr Nogikh
2025-12-01 12:11         ` Amir Goldstein
2025-12-01 10:18   ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251130073017.GS3538@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+b74150fd2ef40e716ca2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox