From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] sched/fair: Rename cfs_rq::avg_vruntime to ::sum_w_vruntime, and helper functions
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 07:46:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251201064647.1851919-7-mingo@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251201064647.1851919-1-mingo@kernel.org>
The ::avg_vruntime field is a misnomer: it says it's an
'average vruntime', but in reality it's the momentary sum
of the weighted vruntimes of all queued tasks, which is
at least a division away from being an average.
This is clear from comments about the math of fair scheduling:
* \Sum (v_i - v0) * w_i := cfs_rq->avg_vruntime
This confusion is increased by the cfs_avg_vruntime() function,
which does perform the division and returns a true average.
The sum of all weighted vruntimes should be named thusly,
so rename the field to ::sum_w_vruntime. (As arguably
::sum_weighted_vruntime would be a bit of a mouthful.)
Understanding the scheduler is hard enough already, without
extra layers of obfuscated naming. ;-)
Also rename related helper functions:
sum_vruntime_add() => sum_w_vruntime_add()
sum_vruntime_sub() => sum_w_vruntime_sub()
sum_vruntime_update() => sum_w_vruntime_update()
With the notable exception of cfs_avg_vruntime(), which
was named accurately.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/debug.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/fair.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index a6ceda12bd35..b6fa5ca6a932 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
SPLIT_NS(left_vruntime));
SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "zero_vruntime",
SPLIT_NS(zero_vruntime));
- SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "avg_vruntime",
+ SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "sum_w_vruntime",
SPLIT_NS(cfs_avg_vruntime(cfs_rq)));
SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "right_vruntime",
SPLIT_NS(right_vruntime));
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 2ffd52a2e7a0..41ede30b74cd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ static inline s64 entity_key(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
* Which we track using:
*
* v0 := cfs_rq->zero_vruntime
- * \Sum (v_i - v0) * w_i := cfs_rq->avg_vruntime
+ * \Sum (v_i - v0) * w_i := cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime
* \Sum w_i := cfs_rq->sum_weight
*
* Since zero_vruntime closely tracks the per-task service, these
@@ -619,32 +619,32 @@ static inline s64 entity_key(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
* As measured, the max (key * weight) value was ~44 bits for a kernel build.
*/
static void
-avg_vruntime_add(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
+sum_w_vruntime_add(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
unsigned long weight = scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
s64 key = entity_key(cfs_rq, se);
- cfs_rq->avg_vruntime += key * weight;
+ cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime += key * weight;
cfs_rq->sum_weight += weight;
}
static void
-avg_vruntime_sub(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
+sum_w_vruntime_sub(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
unsigned long weight = scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
s64 key = entity_key(cfs_rq, se);
- cfs_rq->avg_vruntime -= key * weight;
+ cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime -= key * weight;
cfs_rq->sum_weight -= weight;
}
static inline
-void avg_vruntime_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, s64 delta)
+void sum_w_vruntime_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, s64 delta)
{
/*
- * v' = v + d ==> avg_vruntime' = avg_runtime - d*sum_weight
+ * v' = v + d ==> sum_w_vruntime' = sum_runtime - d*sum_weight
*/
- cfs_rq->avg_vruntime -= cfs_rq->sum_weight * delta;
+ cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime -= cfs_rq->sum_weight * delta;
}
/*
@@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ void avg_vruntime_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, s64 delta)
u64 cfs_avg_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr;
- s64 avg = cfs_rq->avg_vruntime;
+ s64 avg = cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime;
long load = cfs_rq->sum_weight;
if (curr && curr->on_rq) {
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ static void update_entity_lag(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
static int vruntime_eligible(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 vruntime)
{
struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr;
- s64 avg = cfs_rq->avg_vruntime;
+ s64 avg = cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime;
long load = cfs_rq->sum_weight;
if (curr && curr->on_rq) {
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static void update_zero_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
u64 vruntime = cfs_avg_vruntime(cfs_rq);
s64 delta = (s64)(vruntime - cfs_rq->zero_vruntime);
- avg_vruntime_update(cfs_rq, delta);
+ sum_w_vruntime_update(cfs_rq, delta);
cfs_rq->zero_vruntime = vruntime;
}
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS(static, min_vruntime_cb, struct sched_entity,
*/
static void __enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
- avg_vruntime_add(cfs_rq, se);
+ sum_w_vruntime_add(cfs_rq, se);
update_zero_vruntime(cfs_rq);
se->min_vruntime = se->vruntime;
se->min_slice = se->slice;
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ static void __dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
rb_erase_augmented_cached(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline,
&min_vruntime_cb);
- avg_vruntime_sub(cfs_rq, se);
+ sum_w_vruntime_sub(cfs_rq, se);
update_zero_vruntime(cfs_rq);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 54994d93958a..f0eb58458ff3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
unsigned int h_nr_runnable; /* SCHED_{NORMAL,BATCH,IDLE} */
unsigned int h_nr_idle; /* SCHED_IDLE */
- s64 avg_vruntime;
+ s64 sum_w_vruntime;
u64 sum_weight;
u64 zero_vruntime;
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-01 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-01 6:46 [PATCH 0/6] sched: Misc cleanups Ingo Molnar
2025-12-01 6:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched/fair: Join two #ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH blocks Ingo Molnar
2025-12-04 5:53 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-12-06 10:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 7:46 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Join two #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED blocks tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-12-15 7:59 ` tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-12-01 6:46 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched/fair: Clean up comments in 'struct cfs_rq' Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 7:46 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-12-15 7:59 ` tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-12-01 6:46 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched/fair: Separate se->vlag from se->vprot Ingo Molnar
2025-12-01 8:06 ` [PATCH 3/6 v2] " Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 7:46 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-12-15 7:59 ` tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-12-01 6:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched/fair: Rename avg_vruntime() to cfs_avg_vruntime() Ingo Molnar
2025-12-02 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-12-02 15:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-12-01 6:46 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Rename cfs_rq::avg_load to cfs_rq::sum_weight Ingo Molnar
2025-12-02 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-12-02 15:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 7:46 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-12-15 7:59 ` tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-12-01 6:46 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-12-02 10:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched/fair: Rename cfs_rq::avg_vruntime to ::sum_w_vruntime, and helper functions Peter Zijlstra
2025-12-02 15:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 7:46 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-12-15 7:59 ` tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251201064647.1851919-7-mingo@kernel.org \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox