public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	Zhang Yu <zhangyu1@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Jean Philippe-Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Grest <Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix CMDQ timeout warning
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 09:42:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251201094244.00002463@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aSXlFDAa672dZGVm@willie-the-truck>

Hi Will,

On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 17:19:16 +0000
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:

> I'm assuming you're seeing problems with an emulated command queue?
> Any chance you could make that bigger?
Yes, it was initially observed on HyperV emulated CMDQ with small queue
size, which was chosen for latency reasons.

But as I explained in the other thread, the queue space polling timeout
detection problem is not directly related to queue size. It is a
code logic bug IMHO.

Sorry I forgot to directly answer these.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-01 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-14 17:17 [PATCH v4 0/2] SMMU v3 CMDQ fix and improvement Jacob Pan
2025-11-14 17:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix CMDQ timeout warning Jacob Pan
2025-11-14 18:29   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-25 17:19   ` Will Deacon
2025-11-30 23:06     ` Jacob Pan
2025-12-01 19:57       ` Robin Murphy
2025-12-01 21:49         ` Jacob Pan
2025-12-01 17:42     ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2025-11-14 17:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve CMDQ lock fairness and efficiency Jacob Pan
2025-11-25 17:18   ` Will Deacon
2025-11-30 22:52     ` Jacob Pan
2025-12-10  3:11       ` Will Deacon
2025-11-20 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] SMMU v3 CMDQ fix and improvement Jacob Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251201094244.00002463@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangyu1@linux.microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox