public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Stephen Zhang <starzhangzsd@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com, ming.lei@redhat.com,
	hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, csander@purestorage.com,
	colyli@fnnas.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	zhangshida@kylinos.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] block: prevent race condition on bi_status in __bio_chain_endio
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 07:14:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251203061403.GA16604@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANubcdWBF5tCfrutAOiUkFaZb=9s4=bMKzi7dSwQxTGbC_3_1Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 11:09:36AM +0800, Stephen Zhang wrote:
> 
> I’ve been reconsidering the two approaches for the upcoming patch revision.
> Essentially, we’re comparing two methods:
> A:
>         if (bio->bi_status)
>                    parent->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
> B:
>         if (bio->bi_status)
>                 cmpxchg(&parent->bi_status, 0, bio->bi_status);
> 
> Both appear correct, but B seems a little bit redundant here.

A is not correct.  You at least needs READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE here.

B solves all these issues.

> Upon further reflection, I’ve noticed a subtle difference:
> A unconditionally writes to parent->bi_status when bio->bi_status is non-zero,
> regardless of the current value of parent->bi_status.
> B uses cmpxchg to only update parent->bi_status if it is still zero.
> 
> Thus, B could avoid unnecessary writes in cases where parent->bi_status has
> already been set to a non-zero value.

The unnecessary writes don't really matter, we're in an error slow path
here.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-03  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-01  9:04 [PATCH v4 0/3] Fix bio chain related issues zhangshida
2025-12-01  9:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] bcache: fix improper use of bi_end_io zhangshida
2025-12-01  9:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] block: prohibit calls to bio_chain_endio zhangshida
2025-12-01  9:34   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-04  1:17     ` Stephen Zhang
2025-12-01  9:04 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] block: prevent race condition on bi_status in __bio_chain_endio zhangshida
2025-12-01 10:22   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-01 11:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-01 13:07       ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-02  5:48         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-02 21:15           ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-03  1:51             ` Stephen Zhang
2025-12-03  3:09               ` Stephen Zhang
2025-12-03  4:34                 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-03  6:14                 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251203061403.GA16604@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=colyli@fnnas.com \
    --cc=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=starzhangzsd@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhangshida@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox