From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45D7D2C11D9; Thu, 4 Dec 2025 12:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764850365; cv=none; b=h9prbazaLNEpCZugv/r07YTph8Nm1mXW/gSAyidKpZSvWsKxDhHW0oKKm1E0lmJcvuDt8TTqNQAndfkSESQ30L7Ze4RZidAb2oSTOWRGPZGqTj5su7t6sOaSsj4Qj3oHwpOMtLwj+ftG1DsESKK9XRCP2fawrpnVWbBbtiK6KN8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764850365; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MnAsG6ePRRJOpRDDMoEq6lV+mx4w7j/CGerPufzXvZA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sg+4YXoz3wTGasPb45VOY8WS1j/XtnLo6n27L83900MqRUhfIqIW3WmCOglEAvUFzb8F1a4S7uIRteIWsqFsf4j+Jb5INQZrSUfmviC2Flqq/3z8wKdd/lOT1Hao1kBjS/6IEaodcwY15UJJyRWJ5JF4ArcM6TF4bg0peWw7smA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=FbHE4R6L; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="FbHE4R6L" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1764850364; x=1796386364; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=MnAsG6ePRRJOpRDDMoEq6lV+mx4w7j/CGerPufzXvZA=; b=FbHE4R6LeWW4TLXDo7290ZVISR5a6kfzqJDwL8voNqyv2uXh2+dh7Ntd 7OSzL149jxS/Xi6BnmYAHQr6GWkn2XlO8vLofD4DVbeqrCX1eEd9Ww/BO crynXA2sUWZ0oj4o6yhBLDBj5lsRGpWo1n61SLBEBWbX42g/sEJfte4NF cUc6hXNJn6FVSSH1KTm2/oC4BEZXI496Zy94BV+mzn/DAq411VVw1VNyL S3Knr+vcGEXjZOJNMxco+ZLdHe8WpjP/JZd2zYcndLFotPQcgTfBG31H2 0NWiN/rie+Ur1WtINTVPULU1ow0J7J6lXC/dxfwL3RkqY4mRZ7xskrA7j g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: YIlCGe0hThS3hc7Vq6TIoA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: BqfBKswHQ3mT3IW2lt5C4Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11631"; a="84261679" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,248,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="84261679" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Dec 2025 04:12:44 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: VysdT0kbQQe6IHi8h7qaqw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: rWTkQb1lTL2tkwP3FKwIfA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,248,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="218321466" Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2025 04:12:42 -0800 Received: by black.igk.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F01F2A9; Thu, 04 Dec 2025 13:12:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 13:12:40 +0100 From: Mika Westerberg To: Artem Shimko Cc: andi.shyti@kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, jsd@semihalf.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Replace magic numbers with named constants Message-ID: <20251204121240.GD1613537@black.igk.intel.com> References: <20251106110935.2563071-1-a.shimko.dev@gmail.com> <20251204114129.607200-1-a.shimko.dev@gmail.com> <20251204120036.GC1613537@black.igk.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 03:07:55PM +0300, Artem Shimko wrote: > Hi Mika, > > Sorry about that, I'm a newbie and might make mistakes. > > Yes, I'm confused about the versions myself, and yes, there is a v3. > > Am I right? Even though I already sent it in response to the kernel > robot report, would it be better to forward v3 to a separate thread? Just send the next version (whatever it is, v4?) as a separate thread with proper explanations what was changed under the '---' line.