From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Deepakkumar Karn <dkarn@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+e07658f51ca22ab65b4e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: add NULL check in drop_buffers() to prevent null-ptr-deref
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 11:30:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251208193024.GA89444@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251208190306.518502-2-dkarn@redhat.com>
On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 12:33:07AM +0530, Deepakkumar Karn wrote:
> drop_buffers() dereferences the buffer_head pointer returned by
> folio_buffers() without checking for NULL. This leads to a null pointer
> dereference when called from try_to_free_buffers() on a folio with no
> buffers attached. This happens when filemap_release_folio() is called on
> a folio belonging to a mapping with AS_RELEASE_ALWAYS set but without
> release_folio address_space operation defined. In such case,
What user is that? All the users of AS_RELEASE_ALWAYS in 6.18 appear to
supply a ->release_folio. Is this some new thing in 6.19?
--D
> folio_needs_release() returns true because of AS_RELEASE_ALWAYS flag,
> the folio has no private buffer data, causing the try_to_free_buffers()
> with a folio that has no buffers.
>
> Adding NULL check for the buffer_head pointer and return false early if
> no buffers are attached to the folio.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+e07658f51ca22ab65b4e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e07658f51ca22ab65b4e
> Fixes: 6439476311a6 ("fs: Convert drop_buffers() to use a folio")
> Signed-off-by: Deepakkumar Karn <dkarn@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/buffer.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 838c0c571022..fa5de0cdf540 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -2893,6 +2893,10 @@ drop_buffers(struct folio *folio, struct buffer_head **buffers_to_free)
> struct buffer_head *head = folio_buffers(folio);
> struct buffer_head *bh;
>
> + /* In cases of folio without buffer_head*/
> + if (!head)
> + return false;
> +
> bh = head;
> do {
> if (buffer_busy(bh))
> --
> 2.52.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-08 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-08 19:03 [PATCH v2] fs: add NULL check in drop_buffers() to prevent null-ptr-deref Deepakkumar Karn
2025-12-08 19:30 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-12-08 20:13 ` Deepakkumar Karn
2025-12-09 11:18 ` Jan Kara
2025-12-09 16:30 ` Deepak Karn
2025-12-10 9:55 ` Jan Kara
2025-12-10 15:29 ` Deepak Karn
2025-12-10 17:23 ` Jan Kara
2025-12-10 17:50 ` Deepak Karn
2025-12-11 9:15 ` Jan Kara
2025-12-11 12:50 ` Deepak Karn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251208193024.GA89444@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dkarn@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+e07658f51ca22ab65b4e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox