From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EA7D18B0A; Tue, 9 Dec 2025 03:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765251973; cv=none; b=aaIkuvbX/QwHJIZ3143pltHTIihIVQhj41CT7GOzDgpKR9EOfnVCgaZnaGe2XKswgqmuf5fPdm6QnwGIz66Jc5iRlfDvCKaUDOg+8W+vbeZIDFwY8a0w1Ta/SCq9ugZAdW3D4WBnekg5icUDSV6aslQLQeXfp+Cwm80AKZNMsPg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765251973; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Q0I5+eglbrHneyRdqxspYQFUaik0t9UNaPQovrD2kSA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=umNUSSdihepfHh4Wpw+UgiqXTb5hCidS1Cw1fD3DJNDGQx/dWaoe5Fy5/pe7Y81lqkTSNNYaA85LzaGs33Tt3PcO4qER66+vlUMs97rVvlmxMJz2SRf5H6GHY0QzAZaHmZIUkHfSy4bBM3pERLmx5BayLil9OvQbC/7TVxBVmeQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=MuAZeLi+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="MuAZeLi+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1765251971; x=1796787971; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Q0I5+eglbrHneyRdqxspYQFUaik0t9UNaPQovrD2kSA=; b=MuAZeLi+f/d6Oz11F/dqIgVbSpHE+puKe2Ga2ZsFY1Q78M/lml5qHzEq xQVSlKWGd2q4roCQCQbiGsObbuqRto5fXSYVuO0NaWFfYQqqZxbFw6Bce 5I/mBi60mvEweRK6Ic7n4I82OnxAcQctXJqwEw/3WnbDiCYyRXpgYq/vV QetIAC3yKDXgu98kzlfIeIvMTJQJBhkLi5YwTUZmn2xswpl/qgrDElvnB r/ufaTyycMGutNRJFzTMnAfSNQLgffLxaI+FgLFhTHb/uboijjowC2GoR cN2lHt1I7q20r90RUXpTiNl6vLA3SYJY7nLYY8RCsCmJP+A46o3NGNdo3 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vjz5w9nLQr61pUk2UCqeuQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: by8cS3+iRoexlDb1rX/f4A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11636"; a="66211024" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,260,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="66211024" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2025 19:46:11 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yMDG5PiRRqygdlDPtlLQfA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: w9soYkFmTACJ3ZOwPAt3sA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,260,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="219465116" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d335e3c6db51) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Dec 2025 19:46:07 -0800 Received: from kbuild by d335e3c6db51 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vSoft-000000001Hh-36Cu; Tue, 09 Dec 2025 03:46:05 +0000 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 11:45:31 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: chenxiaosong.chenxiaosong@linux.dev, sfrench@samba.org, smfrench@gmail.com, linkinjeon@kernel.org, linkinjeon@samba.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liuzhengyuan@kylinos.cn, huhai@kylinos.cn, liuyun01@kylinos.cn, ChenXiaoSong Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/10] smb/client: introduce smb2maperror KUnit tests Message-ID: <202512091143.FGQ64S2k-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251206151826.2932970-9-chenxiaosong.chenxiaosong@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251206151826.2932970-9-chenxiaosong.chenxiaosong@linux.dev> Hi, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on brauner-vfs/vfs.all] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.18] [cannot apply to cifs/for-next next-20251208] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/chenxiaosong-chenxiaosong-linux-dev/smb-client-reduce-loop-count-in-map_smb2_to_linux_error-by-half/20251206-232731 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251206151826.2932970-9-chenxiaosong.chenxiaosong%40linux.dev patch subject: [PATCH v4 08/10] smb/client: introduce smb2maperror KUnit tests config: i386-randconfig-063-20251208 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251209/202512091143.FGQ64S2k-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251209/202512091143.FGQ64S2k-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512091143.FGQ64S2k-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): ld: fs/smb/client/smb2maperror.o: in function `test_cmp_map': >> fs/smb/client/smb2maperror_test.c:40:(.text+0x1d4): undefined reference to `kunit_binary_str_assert_format' >> ld: fs/smb/client/smb2maperror_test.c:40:(.text+0x20c): undefined reference to `__kunit_do_failed_assertion' >> ld: fs/smb/client/smb2maperror_test.c:39:(.text+0x245): undefined reference to `kunit_binary_assert_format' ld: fs/smb/client/smb2maperror_test.c:39:(.text+0x263): undefined reference to `__kunit_do_failed_assertion' ld: fs/smb/client/smb2maperror_test.c:38:(.text+0x274): undefined reference to `kunit_binary_assert_format' ld: fs/smb/client/smb2maperror_test.c:38:(.text+0x2ba): undefined reference to `__kunit_do_failed_assertion' >> ld: fs/smb/client/smb2maperror_test.c:37:(.text+0x2da): undefined reference to `kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format' ld: fs/smb/client/smb2maperror_test.c:37:(.text+0x314): undefined reference to `__kunit_do_failed_assertion' ld: fs/smb/client/smb2maperror.o: in function `maperror_test_check_sort': >> fs/smb/client/smb2maperror_test.c:28:(.text.unlikely+0x4b): undefined reference to `kunit_binary_assert_format' >> ld: fs/smb/client/smb2maperror_test.c:28:(.text.unlikely+0x60): undefined reference to `__kunit_do_failed_assertion' vim +40 fs/smb/client/smb2maperror_test.c 12 13 static void maperror_test_check_sort(struct kunit *test) 14 { 15 bool is_sorted = true; 16 unsigned int i; 17 18 for (i = 1; i < err_map_num; i++) { 19 if (smb2_error_map_table[i].smb2_status >= 20 smb2_error_map_table[i - 1].smb2_status) 21 continue; 22 23 pr_err("smb2_error_map_table array order is incorrect\n"); 24 is_sorted = false; 25 break; 26 } 27 > 28 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, is_sorted); 29 } 30 31 static void 32 test_cmp_map(struct kunit *test, struct status_to_posix_error *expect) 33 { 34 struct status_to_posix_error *result; 35 36 result = smb2_get_err_map(expect->smb2_status); > 37 KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_NE(test, NULL, result); 38 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expect->smb2_status, result->smb2_status); > 39 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expect->posix_error, result->posix_error); > 40 KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, expect->status_string, result->status_string); 41 } 42 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki