Re: [PATCH 4/9] bitfield: Copy #define parameters to locals

Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-09T15:51:54Z

On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 10:03:08AM +0000, david.laight.linux@gmail.com wrote:

> Use __auto_type to take copies of parameters to both ensure they are
> evaluated only once and to avoid bloating the pre-processor output.
> In particular 'mask' is likely to be GENMASK() and the expension
> of FIELD_GET() is then about 18KB.
>
> Remove any extra (), update kerneldoc.

> Consistently use xxx for #define formal parameters and _xxx for
> local variables.

Okay, I commented below, and I think this is too huge to be in this commit.
Can we make it separate?

> Rather than use (typeof(mask))(val) to ensure bits aren't lost when
> val is shifted left, use '__auto_type _val = 1 ? (val) : _mask;'
> relying on the ?: operator to generate a type that is large enough.
>
> Remove the (typeof(mask)) cast from __FIELD_GET(), it can only make
> a difference if 'reg' is larger than 'mask' and the caller cares about
> the actual type.
> Note that mask usually comes from GENMASK() and is then 'unsigned long'.
>
> Rename the internal defines __FIELD_PREP to __BF_FIELD_PREP and
> __FIELD_GET to __BF_FIELD_GET.
>
> Now that field_prep() and field_get() copy their parameters there is
> no need for the __field_prep() and __field_get() defines.
> But add a define to generate the required 'shift' to use in both defines.

...

> -#define __BF_FIELD_CHECK_MASK(_mask, _val, _pfx) \
> +#define __BF_FIELD_CHECK_MASK(mask, val, pfx) \
> ({ \
> - BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__builtin_constant_p(_mask), \
> - _pfx "mask is not constant"); \
> - BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG((_mask) == 0, _pfx "mask is zero"); \
> - BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__builtin_constant_p(_val) ? \
> - ~((_mask) >> __bf_shf(_mask)) & \
> - (0 + (_val)) : 0, \
> - _pfx "value too large for the field"); \
> - __BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2((_mask) + \
> - (1ULL << __bf_shf(_mask))); \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__builtin_constant_p(mask), \
> + pfx "mask is not constant"); \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG((mask) == 0, _pfx "mask is zero"); \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__builtin_constant_p(val) ? \
> + ~((mask) >> __bf_shf(mask)) & \
> + (0 + (val)) : 0, \
> + pfx "value too large for the field"); \
> + __BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2((mask) + \
> + (1ULL << __bf_shf(mask))); \
> })

I looks like renaming parameters without any benefit, actually the opposite
it's very hard to see if there is any interesting change here. Please, drop
this or make it clear to focus only on the things that needs to be changed.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko