The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Will Rosenberg <whrosenb@asu.edu>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	syzbot+6aaf7f48ae034ab0ea97@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Oliver Rosenberg <olrose55@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/kernfs: null-ptr deref in simple_xattrs_free()
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 09:25:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025121653-overfeed-giblet-5bde@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251216003552.3912290-1-whrosenb@asu.edu>

On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 05:35:52PM -0700, Will Rosenberg wrote:
> There exists a null pointer dereference in simple_xattrs_free() as
> part of the __kernfs_new_node() routine. Within __kernfs_new_node(),
> err_out4 calls simple_xattr_free(), but kn->iattr may be NULL if
> __kernfs_setattr() was never called. As a result, the first argument to
> simple_xattrs_free() may be NULL + 0x38, and no NULL check is done
> internally, causing an incorrect pointer dereference.
> 
> Add a check to ensure kn->iattr is not NULL, meaning __kernfs_setattr()
> has been called and kn->iattr is allocated. Note that struct kernfs_node
> kn is allocated with kmem_cache_zalloc, so we can assume kn->iattr will
> be NULL if not allocated.
> 
> An alternative fix could be to not call simple_xattr_free() at all. As
> was previously discussed during the initial patch, simple_xattr_free()
> is not strictly needed and is included to be consistent with
> kernfs_free_rcu(), which also helps the function maintain correctness if
> changes are made in __kernfs_new_node().
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+6aaf7f48ae034ab0ea97@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6aaf7f48ae034ab0ea97
> Fixes: 382b1e8f30f7 ("kernfs: fix memory leak of kernfs_iattrs in __kernfs_new_node")
> Signed-off-by: Will Rosenberg <whrosenb@asu.edu>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     v1 -> v2: fix patch formatting issues
>     
>     This bug was introduced as part of a patch I made, fixing a memory
>     leak in the error out case.
>     
>     I apologize for the oversight. Further fuzzing revealed the bug,
>     and after checking, I found that syzbot detected the same issue.
> 
>  fs/kernfs/dir.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> index 5c0efd6b239f..29baeeb97871 100644
> --- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> @@ -681,8 +681,10 @@ static struct kernfs_node *__kernfs_new_node(struct kernfs_root *root,
>  	return kn;
>  
>   err_out4:
> -	simple_xattrs_free(&kn->iattr->xattrs, NULL);
> -	kmem_cache_free(kernfs_iattrs_cache, kn->iattr);
> +	if (kn->iattr) {
> +		simple_xattrs_free(&kn->iattr->xattrs, NULL);
> +		kmem_cache_free(kernfs_iattrs_cache, kn->iattr);
> +	}
>   err_out3:
>  	spin_lock(&root->kernfs_idr_lock);
>  	idr_remove(&root->ino_idr, (u32)kernfs_ino(kn));
> 
> base-commit: d358e5254674b70f34c847715ca509e46eb81e6f
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
  older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
  signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
  applied to any older kernel releases.  To properly fix this, please
  follow the documented rules in the
  Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
  this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-16  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-15 23:26 [PATCH] fs/kernfs: null-ptr deref in simple_xattrs_free() Will Rosenberg
2025-12-16  0:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Will Rosenberg
2025-12-16  8:25   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-12-16 16:43     ` [PATCH v3] " Will Rosenberg
2025-12-17  5:19       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-12-17  6:01         ` [PATCH v4] " Will Rosenberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025121653-overfeed-giblet-5bde@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olrose55@gmail.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=syzbot+6aaf7f48ae034ab0ea97@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=whrosenb@asu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox