From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75495333743; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766062240; cv=none; b=jceGsUZkYCRBdKydzyNEmuxasKUptVQ4FJFPooutmlheauSgqa6OmZAI64NojvHdAC0F7feQgxCouYc8ITDLb6yD9XyF5Fce02L419RaNCtTWgSZCcG5ZtOLyz0Zf0zIXfBVgqF3sng4jbXUapzN1MWKBeqbFrhsLuoaY4o2ZGY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766062240; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Zhj03AbbOmOd3fZIlx006hZCyE5QvjNNAfFodJdpKhs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=eWjkWEvaJQXboBxauqpRPljsyO549sY46Gwh2tSXNtX9SwTv0s/ZavreqQWrpHGFLAwcehsKCQjorKFHkz2w39a+V1ogyUhiYfRdTt1RzHpI05NHJ4h6fqNlHfzXD0Xl8P98M01qCgavr/5LrQDRZnzwWUTKgh/wBUldESvC6qI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=p7EbKW1d; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="p7EbKW1d" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F473C116B1; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:50:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1766062240; bh=Zhj03AbbOmOd3fZIlx006hZCyE5QvjNNAfFodJdpKhs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=p7EbKW1dGx7j7mWKhfmU60knOCzLOmUcabi+gxUzgLC+uEdwqWurPXJPZXuCCV0H/ H1slZ7+kvqFN8U0pnmWGBSaYi+x98e2WXTpJyqtIZuAc0Jq7UuuqPe8ogVNHIw+pr1 HfBwaGZD7uKTxNZKzXg/WAEN4h7f7okJ04vzQOLkAYaqjYQSOBkXi05ICZxcVd03vC 1NvhPTx6ft+8u/CYHxULLLWN9rNRm35YX+4KoPQlc3lzh21qEdCACl7S7KMGkA4/pU EpEajcg2EuRSI3G2gFgRBhe3V4N0TGTcI8BrOn8DjU/ltSjj6888eDfGrpquQbkopI W2k/RZ/dZUn+Q== Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 13:50:37 +0100 From: Maxime Ripard To: Luca Ceresoli Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Brodkin , Andrzej Hajda , David Airlie , Fabio Estevam , Hui Pu , Jernej Skrabec , Jerome Brunet , Jonas Karlman , Jonathan Corbet , Kevin Hilman , Laurent Pinchart , Liu Ying , Maarten Lankhorst , Martin Blumenstingl , Neil Armstrong , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Phong LE , Robert Foss , Sascha Hauer , Shawn Guo , Simona Vetter , Thomas Petazzoni , Thomas Zimmermann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/22] drm/bridge: add of_drm_find_and_get_bridge() Message-ID: <20251218-shiny-rugged-bug-d1d3e8@houat> References: <20251216-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-drm_of_find_bridge-v3-1-b5165fab8058@bootlin.com> <0ba037c65f9cadd51082abf2b7857ba7@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha384; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vszq3vrbwpm6jkyb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --vszq3vrbwpm6jkyb Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/22] drm/bridge: add of_drm_find_and_get_bridge() MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi, On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 03:31:01PM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > On Wed Dec 17, 2025 at 11:15 AM CET, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 18:58:34 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > >> of_drm_find_bridge() does not increment the refcount for the returned > >> bridge, but that is required now. However converting it and all its us= ers > >> is not realistically doable at once given the large amount of (direct = and > >> indirect) callers and the complexity of some. > >> > >> > >> [ ... ] > > > > Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard >=20 > Thank you for the prompt review! >=20 > All patches are reviewed now except patch 18 which has no reply. I'm just > pointing out in case it's something you missed. Yes, I couldn't really understand the implications of that one, so I'll leave the review to the maintainers. Maxime --vszq3vrbwpm6jkyb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iJUEABMJAB0WIQTkHFbLp4ejekA/qfgnX84Zoj2+dgUCaUP4nAAKCRAnX84Zoj2+ dkREAYDMzyGsQO2Sx3OBs9bux6ITkH/bFGwHZ4tpRgWit4a1jMHeNuozqpDBMT8K WmLrt7EBgJR1HTyQ6KH6xqqoS2wwREqGdMPi/YcBXvOdlzPZCFsQrfYdAFhAw8ky AW0aV5QIbg== =GFoU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vszq3vrbwpm6jkyb--