From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9182E15C158 for ; Sat, 3 Jan 2026 09:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767431599; cv=none; b=KMNkoPXT3VYPv1vmRSWHVC/aB8KC18VEoB+5G56+QT/CjMs/YpZ3oDrN1MIr+PiXT876JHgKFoUHONOywfy+/+8jaUkiCXJvVM5mVsZgm3PtcyoKk+RjKLZZHSgGUzau0nXPWBAH54lKgI67ZfpN7wYZuZERAClXRuwbGf1FRzY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767431599; c=relaxed/simple; bh=D2JUwaLgQPVcFVxnKAJxg4vCYvDrhyAGsjt3mPC1zq8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KqOU1Jiarxk1/+fzDNPNv9KjzlqIUMhyNB8vPwiG9cp8rksnZxRp7WXZkOfaDOyN2Uf9I19rCGzJWTK/rJzbc87zA8dAn2FmX5IIQvlGjJOKtnTWZ9da0B/CR9QInXtJgLhqYX/nXrfSImVXcZ/MJtrSZ248P5I/6ofzQQlnnmE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=PWG7YkCF; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=nQv5l98g; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="PWG7YkCF"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="nQv5l98g" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1767431596; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4Hb8jN/L6fYCR7fWSSvv5cBYqP1P00Le5VoBUo+rlAg=; b=PWG7YkCFXoMSJy7ghk1BH/BrbrhNfsQia/RyudIOFjSz2g9ua9Vr1yTp9exalFoAQr72t9 motspI/nHiLpS0dBcRLDtxFhihWymbi/K2R8h5dgNdXaVZ/sR0xJItiZSDi2xCGSBmeLRZ i2WMvo3JHD5N/NJRgsSUPR7mHny+fM8= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-2-UrhkxT6FMxunJHRZF-gS4Q-1; Sat, 03 Jan 2026 04:13:15 -0500 X-MC-Unique: UrhkxT6FMxunJHRZF-gS4Q-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: UrhkxT6FMxunJHRZF-gS4Q_1767431594 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4325aa61c6bso4790707f8f.0 for ; Sat, 03 Jan 2026 01:13:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1767431594; x=1768036394; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4Hb8jN/L6fYCR7fWSSvv5cBYqP1P00Le5VoBUo+rlAg=; b=nQv5l98gQ+cgHNo7yX4C326Q7WkrMYQ1j68rqYQVQkUHlhU0x1uSd7E7EJ4DMxmkGY X3WkX/VuETV2g6+DzlVFLtqdSkXTGqhmeyW7j6ej2axyu9upsywoNAOWyq1CNWOtZBRy KJHaSVXHd5gSJK+rAaOfcMAyOXabRpvOpw1RyCygJ5nzbGVBpnUTOAQO8XvCr9jWlUIw uKCw4VS56743CdVhhudSOM82CcolYJuwLKKhEWTgp9dNwQ4nlX4M5U9QCVmpVJ34Ag7+ kepOfXvcl+9zWijc0dprS+7/DARBNvlOQI7x/xaHqbkw8AeFVmQJURNWNYPBcd6uU/Mk /tRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1767431594; x=1768036394; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4Hb8jN/L6fYCR7fWSSvv5cBYqP1P00Le5VoBUo+rlAg=; b=oCLAz/FY8/jnF3qh9oTcF0JpXFXyueVjjEmah+rF/R8AcHX5LP5Ufto5hhlzC5JrxH 3OqDE0QEzY4mYD+IJnaSBkiNcC8L/M6HTw0lKgY7ZX2I2HpGNxWdleJQ6EBfZXwTlj9N LT3LqaSjVU3dHpzoLGOiJ7SFliQ1t6FCag6DkpiMWoXjfudjKBUz4KQBQzF6Oi9VUttV XapQxh/WIy/b78T6H3qA+RjGnfKFbMDTPJsUltungFhJ/xh6rzHLfoIVNT8ly9PxXS9n 0OS7uzfBSckSGf6LtPhmwUUHVbLaBh/5dwHbOHDDdTZwOcaPksUt8pEoeUOEkAVicWLO 2d5A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWnUIzY5NQFxr5DlJDu0lZ0a1HxGNt8s2X25ceovsIPRRt8pMJ2gmJfXUGYdE3RVSlOUsgc9JVzgSNHTy4=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzjupfLWT+t6xyR3Ud2d0IfkXgGUUX06Splw+cLiMsQSIl9BwiR iSaQWk6T8ylDpAfuzk0sNRsw+mV5guTn78Ua9PyyxsXhtOx3SHzDcANuQRtoS357RYvnT6/t8Bd 2Ky2elGAfmqGG0Ux7b0xAkqSByvvzYeQqu6VsEt9cpH/0RCpRFoVz3lvhyJvXLAqvt+GZSCcRTg == X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX6SRh2FRzHmA29l9/qjcw68s2E121vAuKYgt4p9APs5bYwFn4x09/32O83O+Ae /Ouo/KeSwITx1A813iFQjry1sxlZeejFkrSCCrNt9jkLfZ1kkAgkvKtF7G6LB4owtmWucpuofec 6Cqp2PSJ7ioauxcnERA3tO9M+Sd9Q7vX/GBk9lTNlcuMFQHJObZZsKM3ZfIGm70bYO7jTBZDfyM 71/+S6kh892Gd5j37S2jKH5jDnASYEZ7xwpysfwl/JqrY4vgrZwYLTlLvo8xkJ8bzmXiewO9b5z si8CRlmTEduT5jciPFmPE4gJoR41a2UPn3Uouc0v8FZikSAET18SGD7BwErsjkmjAvLRz/D0i1m BObaKHw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:40ce:b0:430:f2ee:b220 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4324e4cb94dmr57084920f8f.19.1767431593700; Sat, 03 Jan 2026 01:13:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE26GgQLEflvynAD5o7MsvyW4N7h1D9HT11b4Oml4DoyBao3uW+BjntwVayJEJqPx+C7BOcZA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:40ce:b0:430:f2ee:b220 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4324e4cb94dmr57084882f8f.19.1767431593183; Sat, 03 Jan 2026 01:13:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from redhat.com ([2a06:c701:73d7:4800:ba30:1c4a:380d:b509]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-4325b6bfe88sm80644627f8f.19.2026.01.03.01.13.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Jan 2026 01:13:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 04:13:09 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Bui Quang Minh Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang , Xuan Zhuo , Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Stanislav Fomichev , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/3] virtio-net: fix the deadlock when disabling rx NAPI Message-ID: <20260103041213-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20260102152023.10773-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260102152023.10773-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com> On Fri, Jan 02, 2026 at 10:20:20PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote: > Calling napi_disable() on an already disabled napi can cause the > deadlock. In commit 4bc12818b363 ("virtio-net: disable delayed refill > when pausing rx"), to avoid the deadlock, when pausing the RX in > virtnet_rx_pause[_all](), we disable and cancel the delayed refill work. > However, in the virtnet_rx_resume_all(), we enable the delayed refill > work too early before enabling all the receive queue napis. > > The deadlock can be reproduced by running > selftests/drivers/net/hw/xsk_reconfig.py with multiqueue virtio-net > device and inserting a cond_resched() inside the for loop in > virtnet_rx_resume_all() to increase the success rate. Because the worker > processing the delayed refilled work runs on the same CPU as > virtnet_rx_resume_all(), a reschedule is needed to cause the deadlock. > In real scenario, the contention on netdev_lock can cause the > reschedule. > > Due to the complexity of delayed refill worker, in this series, we remove > it. When we fail to refill the receive buffer, we will retry in the next > NAPI poll instead. > - Patch 1: removes delayed refill worker schedule and retry refill in next > NAPI > - Patch 2, 3: removes and clean up unused delayed refill worker code > > For testing, I've run the following tests with no issue so far > - selftests/drivers/net/hw/xsk_reconfig.py which sets up the XDP zerocopy > without providing any descriptors to the fill ring. As a result, > try_fill_recv will always fail. > - Send TCP packets from host to guest while guest is nearly OOM and some > try_fill_recv calls fail. Thanks, the patches look good to me. Sent some nitpicking comments, with these addressed: Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > Changes in v2: > - Remove the delayed refill worker to simplify the logic instead of trying > to fix it > - Link to v1: > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251223152533.24364-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com/ > > Link to the previous approach and discussion: > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251212152741.11656-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com/ > > Thanks, > Quang Minh. > > Bui Quang Minh (3): > virtio-net: don't schedule delayed refill worker > virtio-net: remove unused delayed refill worker > virtio-net: clean up __virtnet_rx_pause/resume > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 171 +++++++++------------------------------ > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.43.0