From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEDDB305E21 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2026 13:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767533066; cv=none; b=nj4pCYOhGbSYOKSPdgSXWPcKwStyKxy3vL41y08RNwitBX0YQ+6aR2+dajPGmsjFNkloYmIdIUKbyM2brYPu2M91cxda9ETSj4GaGLxWQjLhQBx5lx23Vc13MEu3HGHToKOHieuC6VztVgcDOMbAKXOsc8j+BIpymMnfqytxXBM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767533066; c=relaxed/simple; bh=B0uBy44yYPCTeijF+QCyYAj5mL/FFSH+8NOvUkxu0aI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ss1B8Pl8MWf4Cip4n6qYGtFBAWKwszO4+QAX91wCoYlO6HVS20/q22ylWGwyZ3mJJm8YqU1EBpprx7Q5a+Wi4A1oYIN7JVrlaIzcvygYJ+JAosh9bNdAPTGh8iSBdxuUkka3/oEtr+KBHuW7/F2A1ZxsCPj7d4hVec5gANMoDYY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Sgyf/qc5; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=bq315AxK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Sgyf/qc5"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="bq315AxK" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1767533062; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EAyKUkQEsR6IIIqmAgORcUN7qmUQxHIzTwUFN+JXvjA=; b=Sgyf/qc5xWBLGpZOWdI9IK3rThkgKaZPsS0xpHfja35udt+3f9CAM9CQPyInhAr+XmcsJT gqr4LAY91fJXOgkwoCy5W2UB1OSpXGPGmtLo3M+fRVEWxhpZvDeIllzEOPi+46Zqpl0pTX ckZkV6/rGnPkERjFC6B9B6HG+0h2OXk= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-336-SuJNYyF5P26xHplF1PF4XQ-1; Sun, 04 Jan 2026 08:24:21 -0500 X-MC-Unique: SuJNYyF5P26xHplF1PF4XQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: SuJNYyF5P26xHplF1PF4XQ_1767533060 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-477563a0c75so48113725e9.1 for ; Sun, 04 Jan 2026 05:24:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1767533060; x=1768137860; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EAyKUkQEsR6IIIqmAgORcUN7qmUQxHIzTwUFN+JXvjA=; b=bq315AxKOffqgntHz5gTirKmvuc9uyJqNYPO0ZBD8kg0oigwMibfBScTn1rbf6N2UP 8dDuQlkT7hp5W3YK98B39o/KnZd0cO3MZ1OhcwALuaj+xkl5KycQXyL4340N3kWiu2mJ qbvwb9ZddVP9tWPGm0vpE/DD7ToVzDFyUqPaax4fC0yeZCsTos+bj2s971tAM7UDL5dn rmunwkjzg5v4tXI4svYnS/epKHBQdksbHqyWneUvXLsq8/0BrFISCLjqmip3KzsNwTYJ 1YYcuICrHrfso+5iBGEdDEFJMyHSUmGkUoXwUl31XLhYLQ7AXmrs5wurnagpUo5STz87 9PFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1767533060; x=1768137860; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EAyKUkQEsR6IIIqmAgORcUN7qmUQxHIzTwUFN+JXvjA=; b=LnaAMFtDNGuma9x3g0XvwkXWxXgAm/TuAQRfomjwAIEZ+xL2UkhYAOWo02kGuaXTer qWKz4qN3hk4X5QrP72F/SIuuGJkbsS1eiCXDrlA0MEr2WXIisO6Lc3hO4k/o1a3fs76x PYw0FKv3CFdodpJasyTHSshGIHQwJ349YIBVntkuQvxNF6H+lu1x5J4vIdAcn0yI+A82 JGSNVZbT7ikPQbDZhs6na6qijrQ2EFqHOBNgFpFvC0AB1xVoruelPx3oV2f6ZWz3FueA 9irX0gaLq9adPCe+SNiURVhtzhuLyIx4Aa8gzWXGa82Q1KHJoBlwyIM1KCvWSy3ADdBh KFng== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUvu9xpbDOiZYa/c7xEeiNBxeHxY6dXI39YAyL2QBxXpICiJtbmOQymxEhaIEkADN6YkhrZrMBM0reeMI4=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxwj48Os3SyQfy8O/JSj4Yr23t2EysI/jXDlGV/Vxu7y4F5WkUd cenEX1eG6CB9ea9wTTrf3A1VtovtkBz0pWSi6A0HcsHm2jCluUnVO2OemVhvETHyKDGWDuyiS7I I2MVso3RY1OVy93SgvSFqOuIiQNPNaqywi1CIzcQ97lwtMB1/7fYKJySil33OfUY1iw== X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX70BYGu8w/1ddNhDwtfLKfQ4fVcNR7PhteGckis5COQCpDbVgGPngYM2p0xoNw dAvK+NKXElF7h/SwvOiQy7XN23lMGR5GGd4GWWfHUmNO9wIZI7iGLNSCxCHIRtt7A3YTl7jHnp+ LDUhIoMb7ikkN4HROdRZATj8enXPrH5SBQnjvhCrmfrYgggnBfH2ZsUq7TIpe7oSZGDpL5SaKkM 5lGdv3YEdB1svefGbUwaLrmh1dboLL+pe0zzHosSZMyRYTpzGUxA8MfyN+uOn+8QQJndswNgtCo atGg4w0V1WxloXOAPImxw+PliHdY+oD06bOlE8VcKtkedfwk7QwruCriEOMvPDYKwymfGjneip/ Rg4jawQQgHf2EY8Mfg6k+Q+H1wa0gX5Rm8A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1d0b:b0:479:2a0b:180d with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47d1954a5f7mr566473045e9.11.1767533060164; Sun, 04 Jan 2026 05:24:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHb41BDbLCFSoL5eNoJrrUmAc0eU1cSU5k6C7Avn1X7zNYgXzU4Nec6OswY+7dRbZjOlu/+8w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1d0b:b0:479:2a0b:180d with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47d1954a5f7mr566472815e9.11.1767533059553; Sun, 04 Jan 2026 05:24:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from redhat.com (IGLD-80-230-31-118.inter.net.il. [80.230.31.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-4324ea1af20sm90322786f8f.2.2026.01.04.05.24.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 04 Jan 2026 05:24:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2026 08:24:15 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Bui Quang Minh Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang , Xuan Zhuo , Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Stanislav Fomichev , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/3] virtio-net: don't schedule delayed refill worker Message-ID: <20260104082317-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20260102152023.10773-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com> <20260102152023.10773-2-minhquangbui99@gmail.com> <20260103115424-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <54e15e32-ee0d-4677-a85d-eb54ffe60a77@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54e15e32-ee0d-4677-a85d-eb54ffe60a77@gmail.com> On Sun, Jan 04, 2026 at 11:33:20AM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote: > On 1/3/26 23:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 02, 2026 at 10:20:21PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote: > > > When we fail to refill the receive buffers, we schedule a delayed worker > > > to retry later. However, this worker creates some concurrency issues > > > such as races and deadlocks. To simplify the logic and avoid further > > > problems, we will instead retry refilling in the next NAPI poll. > > > > > > Fixes: 4bc12818b363 ("virtio-net: disable delayed refill when pausing rx") > > > Reported-by: Paolo Abeni > > > Closes: https://netdev-ctrl.bots.linux.dev/logs/vmksft/drv-hw-dbg/results/400961/3-xdp-py/stderr > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > Suggested-by: Xuan Zhuo > > > Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh > > > --- > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > index 1bb3aeca66c6..ac514c9383ae 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > @@ -3035,7 +3035,7 @@ static int virtnet_receive_packets(struct virtnet_info *vi, > > > } > > > static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget, > > > - unsigned int *xdp_xmit) > > > + unsigned int *xdp_xmit, bool *retry_refill) > > > { > > > struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv; > > > struct virtnet_rq_stats stats = {}; > > > @@ -3047,12 +3047,8 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget, > > > packets = virtnet_receive_packets(vi, rq, budget, xdp_xmit, &stats); > > > if (rq->vq->num_free > min((unsigned int)budget, virtqueue_get_vring_size(rq->vq)) / 2) { > > > - if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC)) { > > > - spin_lock(&vi->refill_lock); > > > - if (vi->refill_enabled) > > > - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0); > > > - spin_unlock(&vi->refill_lock); > > > - } > > > + if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC)) > > > + *retry_refill = true; > > > } > > > u64_stats_set(&stats.packets, packets); > > > @@ -3129,18 +3125,18 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) > > > struct send_queue *sq; > > > unsigned int received; > > > unsigned int xdp_xmit = 0; > > > - bool napi_complete; > > > + bool napi_complete, retry_refill = false; > > > virtnet_poll_cleantx(rq, budget); > > > - received = virtnet_receive(rq, budget, &xdp_xmit); > > > + received = virtnet_receive(rq, budget, &xdp_xmit, &retry_refill); > > > rq->packets_in_napi += received; > > > if (xdp_xmit & VIRTIO_XDP_REDIR) > > > xdp_do_flush(); > > > /* Out of packets? */ > > > - if (received < budget) { > > > + if (received < budget && !retry_refill) { > > > napi_complete = virtqueue_napi_complete(napi, rq->vq, received); > > > /* Intentionally not taking dim_lock here. This may result in a > > > * spurious net_dim call. But if that happens virtnet_rx_dim_work > > > @@ -3160,7 +3156,7 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) > > > virtnet_xdp_put_sq(vi, sq); > > > } > > > - return received; > > > + return retry_refill ? budget : received; > > > } > > > static void virtnet_disable_queue_pair(struct virtnet_info *vi, int qp_index) > > > @@ -3230,9 +3226,11 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev) > > > for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { > > > if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs) > > > - /* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */ > > > - if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL)) > > > - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0); > > > + /* If this fails, we will retry later in > > > + * NAPI poll, which is scheduled in the below > > > + * virtnet_enable_queue_pair > > hmm do we even need this, then? > > > > > + */ > > > + try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL); > > > err = virtnet_enable_queue_pair(vi, i); > > > if (err < 0) > > > @@ -3473,15 +3471,15 @@ static void __virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi, > > > bool refill) > > > { > > > bool running = netif_running(vi->dev); > > > - bool schedule_refill = false; > > > - if (refill && !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL)) > > > - schedule_refill = true; > > > + if (refill) > > > + /* If this fails, we will retry later in NAPI poll, which is > > > + * scheduled in the below virtnet_napi_enable > > > + */ > > > + try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL); > > > > hmm do we even need this, then? > > > > > + > > > if (running) > > > virtnet_napi_enable(rq); > > > - > > > - if (schedule_refill) > > > - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0); > > > } > > > static void virtnet_rx_resume_all(struct virtnet_info *vi) > > > @@ -3777,6 +3775,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs) > > > struct virtio_net_rss_config_trailer old_rss_trailer; > > > struct net_device *dev = vi->dev; > > > struct scatterlist sg; > > > + int i; > > > if (!vi->has_cvq || !virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ)) > > > return 0; > > > @@ -3829,11 +3828,17 @@ static int virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs) > > > } > > > succ: > > > vi->curr_queue_pairs = queue_pairs; > > > - /* virtnet_open() will refill when device is going to up. */ > > > - spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock); > > > - if (dev->flags & IFF_UP && vi->refill_enabled) > > > - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0); > > > - spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock); > > > + if (dev->flags & IFF_UP) { > > > + /* Let the NAPI poll refill the receive buffer for us. We can't > > > + * safely call try_fill_recv() here because the NAPI might be > > > + * enabled already. > > > + */ > > I'd drop this comment, it does not clarify much. > > Here I want to note on why we can't use try_fill_recv like in other places. It does not really answer the question why, you could just disable napi if you wanted. > > > > > + local_bh_disable(); > > > + for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) > > > + virtqueue_napi_schedule(&vi->rq[i].napi, vi->rq[i].vq); > > > + > > > + local_bh_enable(); > > > + } > > > return 0; > > > } > > > -- > > > 2.43.0