From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A291D3A1E70; Sun, 4 Jan 2026 18:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767550405; cv=none; b=lwgeVOCIZyRy1KrMA0a9Ghe5ROsnoFOStBM1+pCNgV/U1mYZ+kBqpTv8Gsv5bskuQXqLHE7toZ/9zbzsemg0Np9Z1KgqpGExSxSrn1H84FBmDsCa+5KaMuAKiFsy+bk4s6Qm4X5zAl4jA/wTPqDEO0XixCAuiFyeU4hp93gM2Wo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767550405; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7aLUiot2SfuGwMnLVofiZQScB17Z0NLov7dmrjYkKj8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PPJtZAzu1GTqwsVw6+v66GBYcy2uGwgEln1OMDXYIOrmUzyNn0Z1rKwzyCy+WrdtR8t74QDg5vKmoL6iv3HgVSDhgC8SHNXDv3ZgEUc39Z650DBKYmUr372dmWf7JgP7YethCRTZdq5SWduGStldyNTR39JlR3ZUXo9AdGnqfMY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=rVGjuvKX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="rVGjuvKX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99084C4CEF7; Sun, 4 Jan 2026 18:13:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1767550405; bh=7aLUiot2SfuGwMnLVofiZQScB17Z0NLov7dmrjYkKj8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rVGjuvKXaV8PbensfG4lQRQXlB5xjTFbHGDiPC0QvCI2etwW4y4iVjH0cwivp33HT LyViESXin1u4ySEGbeDZV3xfg8fa3MsBo4KYTqsl3ey8EU++1BNvQXdfeF+ly47iuV FBawWKsh8xXg+z14cclTGltbwu61GI0t9HYIvkkvcr2TdXLDIp6Ccabsj2Dj/l1ngW qxs8ajFB1AulpmllylfPzTxkScysFZX4TDvGc4tPprXhUbdLZ8dN1D3I8y2b0JyKmA typfIFdaOBVHdF4nche0c01OX6+MhmR9DaaNiys/sLa2L3FQIduj4q9+vrP4JL5NuH EgzVdJvF5nt1g== Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2026 10:13:23 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Michael Thalmeier Cc: Deepak Sharma , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Vadim Fedorenko , Simon Horman , Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Michael Thalmeier , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] net: nfc: nci: Fix parameter validation for packet data Message-ID: <20260104101323.1ac8b478@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20251223072552.297922-1-michael.thalmeier@hale.at> References: <20251223072552.297922-1-michael.thalmeier@hale.at> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 08:25:52 +0100 Michael Thalmeier wrote: > diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c > index 418b84e2b260..a5cafcd10cc3 100644 > --- a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c > +++ b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c > @@ -380,6 +384,10 @@ static int nci_rf_discover_ntf_packet(struct nci_dev *ndev, > pr_debug("rf_tech_specific_params_len %d\n", > ntf.rf_tech_specific_params_len); > > + if (skb->len < (data - skb->data) + > + ntf.rf_tech_specific_params_len + sizeof(ntf.ntf_type)) > + return -EINVAL; Are we validating ntf.rf_tech_specific_params_len against the extraction logic in nci_extract_rf_params_nfca_passive_poll() and friends?