From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@arm.com>,
kernel@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] drm/panthor: Extend IRQ helpers for mask modification/restoration
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 12:12:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260105121220.581a98a2@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251223-panthor-tracepoints-v6-1-d3c998ee9efc@collabora.com>
On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 17:24:58 +0100
Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com> wrote:
> The current IRQ helpers do not guarantee mutual exclusion that covers
> the entire transaction from accessing the mask member and modifying the
> mask register.
>
> This makes it hard, if not impossible, to implement mask modification
> helpers that may change one of these outside the normal
> suspend/resume/isr code paths.
>
> Add a spinlock to struct panthor_irq that protects both the mask member
> and register. Acquire it in all code paths that access these, but drop
> it before processing the threaded handler function. Then, add the
> aforementioned new helpers: mask_enable, mask_disable, and
> resume_restore. The first two work by ORing and NANDing the mask bits,
> and the latter relies on the new behaviour that panthor_irq::mask is not
> set to 0 on suspend.
>
> panthor_irq::suspended remains an atomic, as it's necessarily written to
> outside the mask_lock in the suspend path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
> index f35e52b9546a..bf554cf376fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
> @@ -73,11 +73,14 @@ struct panthor_irq {
> /** @irq: IRQ number. */
> int irq;
>
> - /** @mask: Current mask being applied to xxx_INT_MASK. */
> + /** @mask: Values to write to xxx_INT_MASK if active. */
> u32 mask;
>
> /** @suspended: Set to true when the IRQ is suspended. */
> atomic_t suspended;
> +
> + /** @mask_lock: protects modifications to _INT_MASK and @mask */
> + spinlock_t mask_lock;
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -410,6 +413,8 @@ static irqreturn_t panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_raw_handler(int irq, void *data)
> struct panthor_irq *pirq = data; \
> struct panthor_device *ptdev = pirq->ptdev; \
> \
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&pirq->mask_lock); \
> + \
> if (atomic_read(&pirq->suspended)) \
> return IRQ_NONE; \
> if (!gpu_read(ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_STAT)) \
> @@ -424,9 +429,14 @@ static irqreturn_t panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_threaded_handler(int irq, void *da
> struct panthor_irq *pirq = data; \
> struct panthor_device *ptdev = pirq->ptdev; \
> irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE; \
> + u32 mask; \
> + \
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &pirq->mask_lock) { \
> + mask = pirq->mask; \
> + } \
> \
> while (true) { \
> - u32 status = gpu_read(ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_RAWSTAT) & pirq->mask; \
> + u32 status = (gpu_read(ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_RAWSTAT) & mask); \
> \
> if (!status) \
> break; \
> @@ -435,26 +445,44 @@ static irqreturn_t panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_threaded_handler(int irq, void *da
> ret = IRQ_HANDLED; \
> } \
> \
> - if (!atomic_read(&pirq->suspended)) \
> - gpu_write(ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, pirq->mask); \
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &pirq->mask_lock) { \
> + if (!atomic_read(&pirq->suspended)) { \
> + /* Only restore the bits that were used and are still enabled */ \
> + gpu_write(ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, \
> + gpu_read(ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK) | \
> + (mask & pirq->mask)); \
> + } \
> + } \
> \
> return ret; \
> } \
> \
> static inline void panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_suspend(struct panthor_irq *pirq) \
> { \
> - pirq->mask = 0; \
> - gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, 0); \
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &pirq->mask_lock) { \
> + gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, 0); \
> + } \
> synchronize_irq(pirq->irq); \
> atomic_set(&pirq->suspended, true); \
> } \
> \
> static inline void panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_resume(struct panthor_irq *pirq, u32 mask) \
If pirq->mask is encoding the user-selected mask, there's no point
passing it as an argument to _irq_resume().
> { \
> - atomic_set(&pirq->suspended, false); \
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&pirq->mask_lock); \
> + \
> pirq->mask = mask; \
> - gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_CLEAR, mask); \
> - gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, mask); \
> + atomic_set(&pirq->suspended, false); \
> + gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_CLEAR, pirq->mask); \
> + gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, pirq->mask); \
> +} \
> + \
> +static inline void panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_resume_restore(struct panthor_irq *pirq) \
As mentioned above, I'd just change the semantics of _irq_resume() to
match _irq_resume_restore() and drop _irq_resume_restore().
> +{ \
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&pirq->mask_lock); \
> + \
> + atomic_set(&pirq->suspended, false); \
> + gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_CLEAR, pirq->mask); \
> + gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, pirq->mask); \
> } \
> \
> static int panthor_request_ ## __name ## _irq(struct panthor_device *ptdev, \
> @@ -463,13 +491,33 @@ static int panthor_request_ ## __name ## _irq(struct panthor_device *ptdev, \
> { \
> pirq->ptdev = ptdev; \
> pirq->irq = irq; \
> - panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_resume(pirq, mask); \
> + pirq->mask = mask; \
> + spin_lock_init(&pirq->mask_lock); \
> + panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_resume_restore(pirq); \
> \
> return devm_request_threaded_irq(ptdev->base.dev, irq, \
> panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_raw_handler, \
> panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_threaded_handler, \
> IRQF_SHARED, KBUILD_MODNAME "-" # __name, \
> pirq); \
> +} \
> + \
> +static inline void panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_mask_enable(struct panthor_irq *pirq, u32 mask) \
nit: I think I prefer _irq_{enable,disable}_events() as a name.
> +{ \
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&pirq->mask_lock); \
> + \
> + pirq->mask |= mask; \
> + if (!atomic_read(&pirq->suspended)) \
> + gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, pirq->mask); \
There's still a problem with this solution: you might be re-enabling
interrupts before the threaded handler is done, causing HW interrupts
to needlessly fire. You need to repurpose ::suspended into multi-state
field (ACTIVE, PROCESSING, SUSPENDING, SUSPENDED) to detect the case
where the interrupt is being processed and only write to _INT_MASK if
this ::state == ACTIVE.
> +} \
> + \
> +static inline void panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_mask_disable(struct panthor_irq *pirq, u32 mask) \
> +{ \
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&pirq->mask_lock); \
> + \
> + pirq->mask &= ~mask; \
> + if (!atomic_read(&pirq->suspended)) \
> + gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, pirq->mask); \
> }
>
> extern struct workqueue_struct *panthor_cleanup_wq;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-05 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-23 16:24 [PATCH v6 0/3] Add a few tracepoints to panthor Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-23 16:24 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] drm/panthor: Extend IRQ helpers for mask modification/restoration Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-01-05 11:12 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2026-01-05 13:17 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-01-05 13:29 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-12-23 16:24 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] drm/panthor: Add tracepoint for hardware utilisation changes Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-23 16:25 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/panthor: Add gpu_job_irq tracepoint Nicolas Frattaroli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260105121220.581a98a2@fedora \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=karunika.choo@arm.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
--cc=olvaffe@gmail.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox