From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CEC727702E; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 23:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767656251; cv=none; b=ip+6lkaVfw1IGG4T48b4+0JlOhcADxV755OZY7lJQcWaYi7X5FeOSaPLt5+Kb4I4KKz3ptPGLHMLiqtxfn5ETv+xrzNuL+gvK4dtEunSxQMdWp+fxw7zLNaHIE9WNhXLD4KV0+CwCQC13gqz4M+SaRVWZLxrC1gRizOrscMXyiA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767656251; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E4SBxOLmdIbHhQWVj6ALwoTAYF3TwiAlEm9zSMfhBSE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dGb1CQOFdIqzSqhbx8x6pS0r6rRDTSXEzB8wVVHb6FzVHzb4T6Pque3GliL7muNMXanWPBnQnFXytQC0zd/uMCdGTUvOyXNPgIK9ijdXbriREgve9jmrX5xXhqZBD5+ZjQsAQalF8A7eHWlOv+1h7pPFJwePAs/dPAcCkzDmuzw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VoGs25su; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VoGs25su" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69BA7C19422; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 23:37:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1767656250; bh=E4SBxOLmdIbHhQWVj6ALwoTAYF3TwiAlEm9zSMfhBSE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VoGs25suSV0KvnZHllCdGaVSAaQz4FdSK56K1W0BQGG7Y8GX5CqhKXYUT8yEf3ixu A95ZAlyXt2LhCDsrXbeLRzU87id5qNhMEpTsbG2z3njMI6dNtsLX0JF920R7oN+bU8 Z/eBbZSYxxaFdWEcyfJxfdGXTNIwGLAcN9+mJ48UmTHUBxnSsSq1PqRIgEhKV0ywSq mnIiQpFyRNZN4t1Z8LktnrBxFQrF9oAvPUKUZxj0Irxnj+VtBpwnS9t2+kMZwP3+me c/sap8UFG6qC0JZW4q8qLN2ootryZja0q6rNacjH6H0i7dfFh8Wl3LH0OGxQ6wGvSV 6TW8zTxkCnxwg== Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 15:37:29 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Qingfang Deng Cc: David Yang , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: dsa: yt921x: Protect MIB stats with a lock Message-ID: <20260105153729.0e1241b9@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260105025139.2348-1-dqfext@gmail.com> References: <20260105020905.3522484-1-mmyangfl@gmail.com> <20260105020905.3522484-3-mmyangfl@gmail.com> <20260105025139.2348-1-dqfext@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 10:51:39 +0800 Qingfang Deng wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 10:09:01 +0800, David Yang wrote: > > 64bit variables might not be atomic on 32bit architectures, thus cannot > > be made lock-free. Protect them with a spin lock since get_stats64() > > cannot sleep. > > Synchronizing both reads and updates with a spin lock is an overkill. > See include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h for a better approach. OTOH seq locks require error prone retry logic, YMMV.