From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBBA1258CDF; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 23:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767657136; cv=none; b=fOrZnec73cIJz83xavdadn5TzLzTnMkrf7Vxbwpg2kV5Zcp6kHGdeSiUeNpcMKk2Dwp86Y/IFECURwGHetzZkiw3TifRClOHn8+Fu8x0PJtpJBH+xMuhxfBWb9JK7UHf0qL1gbioUmZgHi9tQVk2ASOAfSbg4VflQPmLEuxd+h0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767657136; c=relaxed/simple; bh=InpbSg5WWbxh5upejxkSWh/I98qw75NJ/xF/DcqG+3M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Lk9mU5pgHuAllQtN9ptk8FhrTCpoGodDEg44WDreS4fnIrvSa5+m/Hd76PtFRxZpM+9DBNOi9tYVgDZfEoqsJUWrThwu+bHclb3heHnf8usfoR8cZDx999rF2b0lOPG6C6j4HbabhvIZuWPjkloBvc1GORFh4wUv4bIE4B9i4B8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NiZWTuMh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NiZWTuMh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE295C116D0; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 23:52:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1767657136; bh=InpbSg5WWbxh5upejxkSWh/I98qw75NJ/xF/DcqG+3M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NiZWTuMhGxKS1KoQT+iLsHi6rYxwLIAf7kW8wTub3Juior/7OEeNCS7zWG9Vee33P 3xKqQjhN8bEiop6+NEGy3CQQ7T2F2o/PYgPdm6gvp3rNSK13hzbyetuHyqeg+9BV12 4SR4n7YcsCnW63nzlsyU4EFyncqrW9kOxt66BbV/MjHD8aajkPKg6h3c09dG/d+s+t THg2HO8vOE6xXVhBgP0TSjZINgXfOglT5ohPy9Tc57PARexqb+ORhFhyyJo20igejS C9DmSfrSwGr4ddUK26iq3wAFpbnKsZUXT9+8crOt0YzDeRUdREFE3E0YN9iCq4GeVi dz4ggSgw4g9Cg== Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 15:52:15 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jonas Jelonek Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?QmrDuHJu?= Mork , Maxime Chevallier Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: sfp: add SMBus I2C block support Message-ID: <20260105155215.6e6e1456@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260105161242.578487-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com> <3c774e4d-b7a6-44e3-99f3-876f5ccb1ca3@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 17:13:45 +0000 Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > > This seems to be almost useless information. While base-commit exists > > > in the net-next tree, commit ae039dad1e17867fce9182b6b36ac3b1926b254a > > > doesn't exist in either net-next nor net trees. > > > > > > My guess is you applied Maxime's patch locally, and that is the > > > commit ID of that patch. =20 > >=20 > > This was supposed to be the stable patch-id obtained with=C2=A0 > > 'git patch-id --stable'. =20 >=20 > Hmm, didn't know about that... but in this context, I wonder how > useful it is. As a maintainer, given that patches submitted don't > specify their patch-id, tracking down which patch is the > pre-requisit would be a mammoth task [...] +1, please wait for any pre-requisites to be in the tree before posting. If you'd like to get early reviews send as RFC. Note that net gets merged into net-next every Thu (in case the dependency is cross-tree this is an extra wait).