public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Maciej Żenczykowski" <maze@google.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: include/net/sock.h:2100:16: sparse: sparse: cast to non-scalar
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 22:35:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260110223548.GA4041651@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260110221508.GF3634291@ZenIV>

On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 10:15:09PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 05:06:31AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
> Folks, could your bot be taught to recognize that kind of situation?
> It's very clear what's going on - an inline function that gets the
> same warning with this config every time it is called.  Commit in
> question has added several calls of that thing; the origin of warning
> has nothing whatsoever to do with it, and that can be guessed without
> even looking at the source - the quoted diff between the logs is quite
> enough for that.
> 
> Looking at the function in question,

[accidentally sent halfway through editing, sorry]

e84a4927a404f (Eric Dumazet               2025-06-20 13:30:00 +0000 2097) static inline kuid_t sk_uid(const struct sock *sk)
e84a4927a404f (Eric Dumazet               2025-06-20 13:30:00 +0000 2098) {
e84a4927a404f (Eric Dumazet               2025-06-20 13:30:00 +0000 2099)       /* Paired with WRITE_ONCE() in sockfs_setattr() */
e84a4927a404f (Eric Dumazet               2025-06-20 13:30:00 +0000 2100)       return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_uid);
e84a4927a404f (Eric Dumazet               2025-06-20 13:30:00 +0000 2101) }

we see that warning in question almost certainly comes from
	READ_ONCE(some_kuid_t_object)
and looking at alpha we see this:
#define __READ_ONCE(x)                                                  \
({                                                                      \
        __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) __x =                                 \
		(*(volatile typeof(__x) *)(&(x)));                      \
	mb();                                                           \
	(typeof(x))__x;                                                 \
})
combined with
typedef struct {
        uid_t val;
} kuid_t;

IOW, it complains about a cast from structure to itself, which is fair
enough - C is pretty clear about not allowing any typecasts to or from
non-scalar types, tautological or not.

Why do we even need that cast?  Seeing that generic __READ_ONCE() is
#define __READ_ONCE(x)  (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x))
the cast added on alpha seems to be pointless.

Folks involved in putting that cast in arch/alpha/include/asm/rwonce.h Cc'd...

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-10 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-10 21:06 include/net/sock.h:2100:16: sparse: sparse: cast to non-scalar kernel test robot
2026-01-10 22:15 ` Al Viro
2026-01-10 22:35   ` Al Viro [this message]
2026-01-11 10:08     ` Eric Dumazet
2026-01-12 12:33       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-11 18:20     ` Al Viro
2026-01-11 18:51       ` Al Viro
2026-01-12 12:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-12 15:02         ` Will Deacon
2026-01-12 19:21         ` Al Viro
2026-01-12 21:16           ` Al Viro
2026-01-12 22:39             ` David Laight
2026-01-13  0:28               ` Al Viro
2026-01-12 12:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-12 19:30       ` Al Viro
2026-01-13 15:27         ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-12  0:49   ` Philip Li
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-12-06 10:09 kernel test robot
2025-08-25  4:45 kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260110223548.GA4041651@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=maze@google.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox