From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92E763612F2; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768232203; cv=none; b=DBhP/w9S4P3z8Y9G4uirXMBh3EUttVCBKxIkn5uwXDk1CQ9454L2rf7yKbXfBek5XQvLuFWK9vrPP7MwkAL/kI5BjEIDnRstcrwYNJu3C0tQkX864L8Agt5isMlnjuPzJbCBX4nfx7pqiQIa2Iqc8gnBjiun7ttsiF1R8duQTrc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768232203; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1IheKnbF9KpHc+KQVqpS9yoJRX/NZTD0YAWB4rwgNT4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=DaWo7TvJNHpgI9SgNcmZnv27yUikTLyEO7Nt1Zf+gRqDWWLpQ4mb/qY3906VC2VYuCLYA8MXqdy9Spk7gNFnQJENeePZJ1PeeABzsRFyCPLd5GahikfrR0NzTKPmY+otTTapsryvdgacG9DO+OAPgiqa9aF8Dylg6RrW4VdY+24= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZtAGRCCo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZtAGRCCo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF16DC16AAE; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:36:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768232203; bh=1IheKnbF9KpHc+KQVqpS9yoJRX/NZTD0YAWB4rwgNT4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZtAGRCCovJdx5faE/e1P43HebX5iIoYXJqMvilM5BAuONqitLKugP4IlpPxp+RnoI Bfsx1G+cKPkG7BPaC19VOxzLYcvfFBFk1CJRXzxt8oaZREejHQapMXVaw4lm/wenFc w8McvlFckcT2H/8i7Uk2+zz0oMIwNfMCuaAcNmhZJcWPN1brOS80PGalj9uZ+bNLXS 04MfUvqujte7dCPboRGrEw4bq9h75IECK50Dob22R4N0+yGd4bOolxe/7LvO2FUPjV QBX8Hrh4NwNIMI2Rvlp4MG9JKaJ5LfyPU5ZimS/BV+QpdRBiKIdkex3ljqsaLxbcbH nqbHyeczFuA5w== From: SeongJae Park To: Gutierrez Asier Cc: SeongJae Park , JaeJoon Jung , akpm@linux-foundation.org, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, artem.kuzin@huawei.com, stepanov.anatoly@huawei.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] mm: improve call_controls_lock Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 07:36:40 -0800 Message-ID: <20260112153641.98331-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <909dbaad-f0da-4372-a151-a393619da6ec@huawei-partners.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 13:32:59 +0300 Gutierrez Asier wrote: [...] > I can submit a new updated patch with this small change. However, > I believe, as discussed before, that the improvement in general will > be small and it may not be worth it. I agree. I don't think we need the updated patch for now. Thanks, SJ [...]