Re: [PATCH 30/44] fs: use min() or umin() instead of min_t()

[David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>]

On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 18:33:46 +0000
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:56:56 +0000
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 10:41:26PM +0000, david.laight.linux@gmail.com wrote:  
> > > From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > min_t(unsigned int, a, b) casts an 'unsigned long' to 'unsigned int'.
> > > Use min(a, b) instead as it promotes any 'unsigned int' to 'unsigned long'
> > > and so cannot discard significant bits.    
> > 
> > This breaks an arm imx_v6_v7_defconfig build:  
> 
> I hadn't tested 32bit when I sent the patch.
> It was noticed ages ago and I thought there was a patch (to fuse/file.c) that
> changed the code to avoid the 64bit signed maths on 32bit.

I've just sent in a patch to fix it, compile tested for 32bit x86.

	David

> > 
> > In file included from <command-line>:
> > In function 'fuse_wr_pages',
> >     inlined from 'fuse_perform_write' at /home/broonie/git/bisect/fs/fuse/file.c:1347:27:
> > /home/broonie/git/bisect/include/linux/compiler_types.h:630:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_434' declared with attribute error: min(((pos + len - 1) >> 12) - (pos >> 12) + 1, max_pages) signedness error
...                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > /home/broonie/git/bisect/fs/fuse/file.c:1326:16: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
> >  1326 |         return min(((pos + len - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT) - (pos >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 1,
> >       |                ^~~  
>