The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To: brauner@kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	yi1.lai@linux.intel.com, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] fs: make insert_inode_locked() wait for inode destruction
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 10:47:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260114094717.236202-1-mjguzik@gmail.com> (raw)

This is the only routine which instead skipped instead of waiting.

The current behavior is arguably a bug as it results in a corner case
where the inode hash can have *two* matching inodes, one of which is on
its way out.

Ironing out this difference is an incremental step towards sanitizing
the API.

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
---

v2:
- add a way to avoid the rcu dance in __wait_on_freeing_inode


 fs/inode.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 8a47c4da603f..a4cfe9182a7c 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1028,19 +1028,20 @@ long prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb, struct shrink_control *sc)
 	return freed;
 }
 
-static void __wait_on_freeing_inode(struct inode *inode, bool is_inode_hash_locked);
+static void __wait_on_freeing_inode(struct inode *inode, bool hash_locked, bool rcu_locked);
+
 /*
  * Called with the inode lock held.
  */
 static struct inode *find_inode(struct super_block *sb,
 				struct hlist_head *head,
 				int (*test)(struct inode *, void *),
-				void *data, bool is_inode_hash_locked,
+				void *data, bool hash_locked,
 				bool *isnew)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = NULL;
 
-	if (is_inode_hash_locked)
+	if (hash_locked)
 		lockdep_assert_held(&inode_hash_lock);
 	else
 		lockdep_assert_not_held(&inode_hash_lock);
@@ -1054,7 +1055,7 @@ static struct inode *find_inode(struct super_block *sb,
 			continue;
 		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
 		if (inode_state_read(inode) & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) {
-			__wait_on_freeing_inode(inode, is_inode_hash_locked);
+			__wait_on_freeing_inode(inode, hash_locked, true);
 			goto repeat;
 		}
 		if (unlikely(inode_state_read(inode) & I_CREATING)) {
@@ -1078,11 +1079,11 @@ static struct inode *find_inode(struct super_block *sb,
  */
 static struct inode *find_inode_fast(struct super_block *sb,
 				struct hlist_head *head, unsigned long ino,
-				bool is_inode_hash_locked, bool *isnew)
+				bool hash_locked, bool *isnew)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = NULL;
 
-	if (is_inode_hash_locked)
+	if (hash_locked)
 		lockdep_assert_held(&inode_hash_lock);
 	else
 		lockdep_assert_not_held(&inode_hash_lock);
@@ -1096,7 +1097,7 @@ static struct inode *find_inode_fast(struct super_block *sb,
 			continue;
 		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
 		if (inode_state_read(inode) & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) {
-			__wait_on_freeing_inode(inode, is_inode_hash_locked);
+			__wait_on_freeing_inode(inode, hash_locked, true);
 			goto repeat;
 		}
 		if (unlikely(inode_state_read(inode) & I_CREATING)) {
@@ -1832,16 +1833,13 @@ int insert_inode_locked(struct inode *inode)
 	while (1) {
 		struct inode *old = NULL;
 		spin_lock(&inode_hash_lock);
+repeat:
 		hlist_for_each_entry(old, head, i_hash) {
 			if (old->i_ino != ino)
 				continue;
 			if (old->i_sb != sb)
 				continue;
 			spin_lock(&old->i_lock);
-			if (inode_state_read(old) & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) {
-				spin_unlock(&old->i_lock);
-				continue;
-			}
 			break;
 		}
 		if (likely(!old)) {
@@ -1852,6 +1850,11 @@ int insert_inode_locked(struct inode *inode)
 			spin_unlock(&inode_hash_lock);
 			return 0;
 		}
+		if (inode_state_read(old) & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) {
+			__wait_on_freeing_inode(old, true, false);
+			old = NULL;
+			goto repeat;
+		}
 		if (unlikely(inode_state_read(old) & I_CREATING)) {
 			spin_unlock(&old->i_lock);
 			spin_unlock(&inode_hash_lock);
@@ -2522,16 +2525,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_needs_sync);
  * wake_up_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_NEW) after removing from the hash list
  * will DTRT.
  */
-static void __wait_on_freeing_inode(struct inode *inode, bool is_inode_hash_locked)
+static void __wait_on_freeing_inode(struct inode *inode, bool hash_locked, bool rcu_locked)
 {
 	struct wait_bit_queue_entry wqe;
 	struct wait_queue_head *wq_head;
 
+	VFS_BUG_ON(!hash_locked && !rcu_locked);
+
 	/*
 	 * Handle racing against evict(), see that routine for more details.
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(inode_unhashed(inode))) {
-		WARN_ON(is_inode_hash_locked);
+		WARN_ON(hash_locked);
 		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -2539,14 +2544,16 @@ static void __wait_on_freeing_inode(struct inode *inode, bool is_inode_hash_lock
 	wq_head = inode_bit_waitqueue(&wqe, inode, __I_NEW);
 	prepare_to_wait_event(wq_head, &wqe.wq_entry, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	if (is_inode_hash_locked)
+	if (rcu_locked)
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+	if (hash_locked)
 		spin_unlock(&inode_hash_lock);
 	schedule();
 	finish_wait(wq_head, &wqe.wq_entry);
-	if (is_inode_hash_locked)
+	if (hash_locked)
 		spin_lock(&inode_hash_lock);
-	rcu_read_lock();
+	if (rcu_locked)
+		rcu_read_lock();
 }
 
 static __initdata unsigned long ihash_entries;
-- 
2.48.1


             reply	other threads:[~2026-01-14  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-14  9:47 Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2026-01-14 15:56 ` [PATCH v2] fs: make insert_inode_locked() wait for inode destruction Christian Brauner
2026-01-14 17:53 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-13  1:59 ` Lai, Yi
2026-03-14  9:12   ` Mateusz Guzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260114094717.236202-1-mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --to=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yi1.lai@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox