From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [62.89.141.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E1D1286416; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 03:09:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768446569; cv=none; b=ThokpaKm9Yu1GPFln/1Br7rtqcmn2Re2oh+chCBUKW2xEwv3N+VtALu3hfaFiEGxytF1SkUqZgfNyKU1Nnj0e0GnZ4UUhL5lVwVXTdfHPt27bopTSZ5dE+jJ/+CoDeEimKT5HpWgpZLfpf9HR3FFL8JXKPokuFpj9dzILzY16xs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768446569; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JE9cU2LzusJj/oZIUHZ9XxnYw2KtldTmnjKtiHkwhSs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ogwp8LsI/o9UlooHtLz8vrN+i9OV8rC9U5XfpheCSD57n9F4quAOIHT/eDuljBZMXWRsldb9FApauJDwt24fmnOuSIcib5Vkw3PVWrxVlQVM3xcERaZlNKY9LYW0gbsV2aCdhxg8hVrFRtFCWVKFhcjZGohhJxs37WXb2aoCpxw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b=inp4gGxQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="inp4gGxQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Ksym1g+gGBE8mXwI5HX3eHvz4/J90jASHV28iccgfBg=; b=inp4gGxQbD9Ck7Bgb4jqnd5gge yh/aw0HGi67ylOgWjYpP+4YTorj/cyckqcj5keAHut6H16MOGaS/1jbYwV26EtU8o++sleCTdQlV5 v5hDZf64WHpvAZpzsji3Bw/c6/T882PvnStDoXHDxGLNzTc/MFOGF6aFJ9Eu0wti/UIp49Ku/bDpu M/TBsivpYrDiYOWbW0xyB9Ft+6u5QyBuvIur/iQXtVnl2BIXfH3Vyn3wzzq8w3YjMcNfv70ZWrV/2 TmkXFgLe+AfJfLc4ztpGtu8K8wGMpcVqxrGRoNKRlHz++6uDUaMbC3cPSAOvlZQ4ZpUZ6d1XyNeeP ua/GQ7Pg==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.99 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vgDl7-00000000ld9-3UdM; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 03:10:53 +0000 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 03:10:53 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the vfs tree Message-ID: <20260115031053.GY3634291@ZenIV> References: <20260115140132.6e0c05a0@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260115140132.6e0c05a0@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: Al Viro On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 02:01:32PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced > this warning: > > Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst:1348: ERROR: Unknown target name: "filename". [docutils] > > Introduced by commit > > 7335480a8461 ("non-consuming variant of do_linkat()") Egads... That's from "filename_{link,renameat2}()" in there (there's also "do_{link,renameat2}()" earlier in the same line, but that didn't produce a warning. Any suggestions re better way to spell it for .rst?