Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: core/rtw_mlme_ext.c: flatten control flow in OnAssocReq()

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 04:14:32PM -0500, William Hansen-Baird wrote:
> Rewrite if-else construct with an early exit to reduce indentation,
> and make the execution clearer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: William Hansen-Baird <william.hansen.baird@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 59 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> index ac49bfbaa5bb..d3b395894d4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> @@ -1181,47 +1181,46 @@ unsigned int OnAssocReq(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *precv_frame)
>  		p = pframe + WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN + ie_offset; ie_len = 0;
>  		for (;;) {
>  			p = rtw_get_ie(p, WLAN_EID_VENDOR_SPECIFIC, &ie_len, pkt_len - WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN - ie_offset);
> -			if (p) {
> -				if (!memcmp(p+2, WMM_IE, 6)) {
> +			if (!p)
> +				break;
>  
> -					pstat->flags |= WLAN_STA_WME;
> +			if (!memcmp(p+2, WMM_IE, 6)) {
>  
> -					pstat->qos_option = 1;
> -					pstat->qos_info = *(p+8);
> +				pstat->flags |= WLAN_STA_WME;
>  
> -					pstat->max_sp_len = (pstat->qos_info>>5)&0x3;
> +				pstat->qos_option = 1;
> +				pstat->qos_info = *(p+8);
>  
> -					if ((pstat->qos_info&0xf) != 0xf)
> -						pstat->has_legacy_ac = true;
> -					else
> -						pstat->has_legacy_ac = false;
> +				pstat->max_sp_len = (pstat->qos_info>>5)&0x3;
>  
> -					if (pstat->qos_info&0xf) {
> -						if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(0))
> -							pstat->uapsd_vo = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> -						else
> -							pstat->uapsd_vo = 0;
> +				if ((pstat->qos_info&0xf) != 0xf)
> +					pstat->has_legacy_ac = true;
> +				else
> +					pstat->has_legacy_ac = false;
>  
> -						if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(1))
> -							pstat->uapsd_vi = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> -						else
> -							pstat->uapsd_vi = 0;
> +				if (pstat->qos_info&0xf) {
> +					if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(0))
> +						pstat->uapsd_vo = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> +					else
> +						pstat->uapsd_vo = 0;
>  
> -						if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(2))
> -							pstat->uapsd_bk = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> -						else
> -							pstat->uapsd_bk = 0;
> +					if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(1))
> +						pstat->uapsd_vi = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> +					else
> +						pstat->uapsd_vi = 0;
>  
> -						if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(3))
> -							pstat->uapsd_be = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> -						else
> -							pstat->uapsd_be = 0;
> +					if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(2))
> +						pstat->uapsd_bk = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> +					else
> +						pstat->uapsd_bk = 0;
>  
> -					}
> +					if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(3))
> +						pstat->uapsd_be = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> +					else
> +						pstat->uapsd_be = 0;
>  
> -					break;
>  				}
> -			} else {
> +
>  				break;

If all ways through this loop ends up in a break, why is this a loop at
all?

thanks,

greg k-h