From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com>,
ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ocfs2: fix NULL pointer dereference in ocfs2_get_refcount_rec
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 10:49:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026011959-durably-repacking-e7d4@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3f1974d-5e88-4824-8466-6abea6359c19@web.de>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 10:42:29AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …> This patch adds an 'else' branch …
>
> Thanks for another contribution.
>
> * Does anything hinder to follow a corresponding wording requirement?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.19-rc5#n94
>
> * Can it be helpful to append parentheses to function names?
>
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-19 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-17 16:16 [PATCH] ocfs2: fix NULL pointer dereference in ocfs2_get_refcount_rec Jiasheng Jiang
2026-01-18 13:41 ` Markus Elfring
2026-01-18 19:05 ` [PATCH v2] " Jiasheng Jiang
2026-01-19 6:37 ` Greg KH
2026-01-19 9:42 ` Markus Elfring
2026-01-19 9:49 ` Greg KH [this message]
2026-01-19 14:43 ` Heming Zhao
2026-01-19 17:12 ` [PATCH v2] ocfs2: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ocfs2_get_refcount_rec() Jiasheng Jiang
2026-01-20 1:46 ` Heming Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026011959-durably-repacking-e7d4@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox