From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Cc: "Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Nick Desaulniers" <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
"Justin Stitt" <justinstitt@google.com>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Marc Herbert" <Marc.Herbert@linux.intel.com>,
"Uros Bizjak" <ubizjak@gmail.com>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Jeff Xu" <jeffxu@chromium.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Shakeel Butt" <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>,
"John Stultz" <jstultz@google.com>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Brian Gerst" <brgerst@gmail.com>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, "Nicolas Schier" <nsc@kernel.org>,
"Tamir Duberstein" <tamird@gmail.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Naman Jain" <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Douglas Anderson" <dianders@chromium.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Compiler Attributes: Add __counted_by_ptr macro
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 19:15:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260120191540.50a22ba8@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGG=3QWeYZqLA8FSMYZFRrJ24LtEKJdmRAq3awkMZj0+qy=4_w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:12:34 -0800
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2026 at 11:07 AM Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 09:53:18AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > > On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:57:57 +0000
> > > Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Introduce __counted_by_ptr(), which works like __counted_by(), but for
> > > > pointer struct members.
> > > >
> > > > struct foo {
> > > > int a, b, c;
> > > > char *buffer __counted_by_ptr(bytes);
> > > > short nr_bars;
> > > > struct bar *bars __counted_by_ptr(nr_bars);
> > > > size_t bytes;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > Because "counted_by" can only be applied to pointer members in very
> > > > recent compiler versions, its application ends up needing to be distinct
> > > > from flexibe array "counted_by" annotations, hence a separate macro.
> > > ...
> > > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > > > index 9d38125263fb..6b029f694bc2 100644
> > > > --- a/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/Makefile
> > > > @@ -952,6 +952,12 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(CC_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO_ENABLER)
> > > > endif
> > > > endif
> > > >
> > > > +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> > > > +ifdef CONFIG_CC_HAS_COUNTED_BY_PTR
> > > > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fexperimental-late-parse-attributes
> > > > +endif
> > > > +endif
> > >
> > > Will that still be needed for clang 22?
> >
> > AFAIK, yes. AIUI, this flag will remain while -fbounds-safety continues
> > to be upstreamed into LLVM.
> >
> > > Looks a bit like a temporary flag to avoid regressions.
> > > Probably ought to at least have a comment that it won't be needed
> > > by some future clang version so that it gets tidied up.
> >
> > Once it's no longer needed, yes, I will want it removed from the
> > Makefile.
> >
> Would it be good to 'fixup' a comment in the Makefile for that?
Wrap with:
# Update version when no longer required
ifneq ($(call clang-min-version, 999999),y)
Although you might one day need the -f option for something entirely different.
So perhaps the logic that enables CC_HAS_COUNTER_BY_PTR need to do the
extra version check and set something so that -fexperimental-late-parse-attributes
is added here (so it only added once if needed by multiple things).
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-21 19:39 [PATCH 0/2] Add __counted_by_ptr macro Bill Wendling
2025-11-21 19:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] Compiler Attributes: " Bill Wendling
2025-11-21 19:46 ` Bill Wendling
2025-11-21 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 " Bill Wendling
2025-11-21 21:47 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-11-24 20:01 ` Bill Wendling
2026-01-16 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-17 19:05 ` Kees Cook
2026-01-17 19:18 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-14 19:36 ` [PATCH " Bill Wendling
2026-01-15 4:00 ` Kees Cook
2026-01-16 0:59 ` Bill Wendling
2026-01-16 8:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-17 19:06 ` Kees Cook
2026-01-16 0:57 ` [PATCH v4 " Bill Wendling
2026-01-16 9:53 ` David Laight
2026-01-17 19:07 ` Kees Cook
2026-01-20 18:12 ` Bill Wendling
2026-01-20 19:15 ` David Laight [this message]
2026-01-20 18:11 ` Bill Wendling
2026-01-17 19:01 ` Kees Cook
2026-02-10 8:41 ` [PATCH " Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-10 11:00 ` Bill Wendling
2026-02-10 11:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-10 11:29 ` Bill Wendling
2025-11-21 19:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] memblock: annotate struct memblock_type with __counted_by_ptr Bill Wendling
2025-11-22 0:30 ` Kees Cook
2025-11-22 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-24 19:19 ` Kees Cook
2025-11-24 20:15 ` Bill Wendling
2026-01-16 8:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-20 21:06 ` Bill Wendling
2025-11-25 12:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-21 23:25 ` [PATCH 0/2] Add __counted_by_ptr macro Kees Cook
2025-11-24 20:05 ` Bill Wendling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260120191540.50a22ba8@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=Marc.Herbert@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeffxu@chromium.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=namjain@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tamird@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox