From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 217C12264BB for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769041579; cv=none; b=r43pA74yf2CeuPPrkquptzyCpIJ14EhkmP1ky0S+gugA5FzSLGHzjfuxz1Z2w11mlPdOBrpJ2BWI17W3hyIq6JEfX+IQoKZBbvIyzEvuMT0llOX9C4kumvGRsc/Y2Us+LgBffvfujoQu0nzsKEaKA74hdCXgaB4z9UBBXRFArC4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769041579; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hP+9fk7VaCo2SPT/AetIm7YfIJIqEA8BJRaRGX3vSrg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Cgl+9j97fSPXJ72bT/Pb+DTAcC8kDqu9Wa1nNctw69UNdeEtOgvLWRAWpWeMnI7qR9VKX3zNJknlEvmE8xO3LI1r91BPlat2S4EhQfjJFt40OmG8NqiiMy4p8Xduq+CEkW+AcbmvWw0KGXeEMphJyXzLetOrSnmCwdM2i7zZCRI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=2eXjaZn+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="2eXjaZn+" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45D1E4E421D8 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 010EC60711; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 0D39D102F0B74; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 01:26:10 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1769041572; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=x4jg29QU41LLNzuVU5AM3L7b1Wlo+jm9c6ZZ5u4Zv4A=; b=2eXjaZn+jaZCAHoQX8mXzr+COm0SdUn4VylHsLTEi0nPXCh+HiD9OdSCL17urswEnm1bPv YICTmjXUKNQB6boklJvHme4rm+WRCTKf3v7PgoIVEr/7W3umx3E0sKLEmcf04TFCdokodY PGmznMvhodZsSnsBu2x1dk2FpiAF4T62Hr4ZXR3q75VaAafPbgAfOVhmOA0Tx1tChHLHi2 KA7rD8wPRquZt4IuGB1Wa8owWlvKUaqyD3qTpa7/iqjnAUxY25kSHYJif+G/LAyM8bPwTG sHICX4Igpx2fDePAbJLfnk8PrTM1QO20F7dZsnsI143NZi4Uf0KJT7gZWgxNIg== Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 01:26:09 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Brian Masney Cc: Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/27] rtc: ac100: convert from divider_round_rate() to divider_determine_rate() Message-ID: <202601220026092a75a45e@mail.local> References: <20260108-clk-divider-round-rate-v1-0-535a3ed73bf3@redhat.com> <20260108-clk-divider-round-rate-v1-3-535a3ed73bf3@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260108-clk-divider-round-rate-v1-3-535a3ed73bf3@redhat.com> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hello, On 08/01/2026 16:16:21-0500, Brian Masney wrote: > The divider_round_rate() function is now deprecated, so let's migrate > to divider_determine_rate() instead so that this deprecated API can be > removed. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney > > --- > To: Alexandre Belloni > Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org > --- > drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c > index 33626311fa781b5ce90dcc472f948dc933bbc897..16aca4431da8c029e6195d8a3c9fe75fa95d0bc0 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c > @@ -140,42 +140,16 @@ static unsigned long ac100_clkout_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH); > } > > -static long ac100_clkout_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > - unsigned long prate) > -{ > - unsigned long best_rate = 0, tmp_rate, tmp_prate; > - int i; > - > - if (prate == AC100_RTC_32K_RATE) > - return divider_round_rate(hw, rate, &prate, NULL, > - AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH, > - CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO); > - > - for (i = 0; ac100_clkout_prediv[i].div; i++) { > - tmp_prate = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, ac100_clkout_prediv[i].val); > - tmp_rate = divider_round_rate(hw, rate, &tmp_prate, NULL, > - AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH, > - CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO); > - > - if (tmp_rate > rate) > - continue; > - if (rate - tmp_rate < best_rate - tmp_rate) > - best_rate = tmp_rate; > - } > - > - return best_rate; > -} > - > static int ac100_clkout_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > struct clk_rate_request *req) > { > - struct clk_hw *best_parent; > + int i, ret, num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw); > + struct clk_hw *best_parent = NULL; > unsigned long best = 0; > - int i, num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw); > > for (i = 0; i < num_parents; i++) { > struct clk_hw *parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(hw, i); > - unsigned long tmp, prate; > + unsigned long prate; > > /* > * The clock has two parents, one is a fixed clock which is > @@ -199,13 +173,40 @@ static int ac100_clkout_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > > prate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent); > > - tmp = ac100_clkout_round_rate(hw, req->rate, prate); > - > - if (tmp > req->rate) > - continue; > - if (req->rate - tmp < req->rate - best) { > - best = tmp; > - best_parent = parent; > + if (prate == AC100_RTC_32K_RATE) { > + struct clk_rate_request div_req = *req; > + > + div_req.best_parent_rate = prate; > + > + ret = divider_determine_rate(hw, &div_req, NULL, > + AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH, > + CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO); > + if (ret != 0 || div_req.rate > req->rate) > + continue; This leaves a braces inbalance > + else if (req->rate - div_req.rate < req->rate - best) { > + best = div_req.rate; > + best_parent = parent; > + } > + } else { > + int j; > + > + for (j = 0; ac100_clkout_prediv[j].div; j++) { > + struct clk_rate_request div_req = *req; > + unsigned long tmp_prate; > + > + tmp_prate = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, ac100_clkout_prediv[j].div); > + div_req.best_parent_rate = tmp_prate; > + > + ret = divider_determine_rate(hw, &div_req, NULL, > + AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH, > + CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO); > + if (ret != 0 || div_req.rate > req->rate) > + continue; Ditto. > + else if (req->rate - div_req.rate < req->rate - best) { > + best = div_req.rate; > + best_parent = parent; > + } > + } > } > } -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com