From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 602E43370F4; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769161323; cv=none; b=H3uR6apX+/tmwgTw6Zlk3oDfpRq0hb0W2xGdrAPVHS7cSBOFPS3/W45WTeEqlTX8T+fqftLGShY5cy4vCM5CuQG0ThesOOw0POcU9leP3WmFHvXozw6qP6ELf87E7mJISTMAp7mvj7HNpY4XBkM8jP/Eq+RHAbbw26ZZTNHFq78= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769161323; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bYe+5mye5EU5BZsStchEKf+8Drtyqh4KMfvGrN988sQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rqcRwVu0LpTfD+clviILUgbI+zpl+7jkk9OGoRGsBieLG86Re7PT/qunI4yp4r7tVJTsDgjphgu+2ATPxmsRdegrJLaBxGdk3ynfhrTqfd//vWvvm32axBgYQT7q90QtwjZgcb4o4V7OENcuvFGX5sp/oNZV1PsjmbEyZHk54EY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=PyCFZpHk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="PyCFZpHk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1769161311; x=1800697311; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=bYe+5mye5EU5BZsStchEKf+8Drtyqh4KMfvGrN988sQ=; b=PyCFZpHkRIqCDyrNk3EPIVYAUwhifWU5jWuekmV6Vm7/AvfwC6eCGxyH 4u8f5GqZ3PVTyH/O41DHdIBINoI/5BZJpO9huTHatO+lg9DQezbwJpfl2 ve+0os3LJjogqeDmOgQ518spPbmIITKcVVNnHgUCH6ohU3P3hWOMuzct4 iJtRwrNKJa0Zgwz+VQ4MKnpPkM15hlDdLw5DQTOOUE7QsaupHuVDgc96r f4JIqjmf0zO+oTC3c1sHc/JX4GLnGKG04ZbK4avRAUTRFkXB1uaPxo0+D iBPSQNpCLXrvF2Xbf6HQ9R9uHxYnR18HZeHtQRSybTeFojbtyjEvuWx9o Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: NekDLB1wTg2VlbiTQYhDCQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 85Na7V7eT9ywou9do7vxOA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11679"; a="69609349" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,248,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="69609349" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2026 01:41:46 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: kyXBHUVgTH2HCovzzPevqA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: kowiCTB3S32lqyVb8NcsVw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,248,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="211985262" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO afc5bfd7f602) ([10.211.93.152]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2026 01:41:43 -0800 Received: from kbuild by afc5bfd7f602 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vjDfg-000000000gj-3hLp; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:41:40 +0000 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 10:40:58 +0100 From: kernel test robot To: Aaron Tomlin , rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, pavel@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, neelx@suse.com, atomlin@atomlin.com, sean@ashe.io, mproche@gmail.com, chjohnst@gmail.com, nick.lange@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: QoS: Introduce boot parameter pm_qos_resume_latency_us Message-ID: <202601231030.N1gaWeuj-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260123010024.3301276-1-atomlin@atomlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260123010024.3301276-1-atomlin@atomlin.com> Hi Aaron, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on driver-core/driver-core-testing] [also build test WARNING on driver-core/driver-core-next driver-core/driver-core-linus rafael-pm/linux-next rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master amd-pstate/linux-next amd-pstate/bleeding-edge v6.19-rc6 next-20260122] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Aaron-Tomlin/PM-QoS-Introduce-boot-parameter-pm_qos_resume_latency_us/20260123-090409 base: driver-core/driver-core-testing patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260123010024.3301276-1-atomlin%40atomlin.com patch subject: [PATCH] PM: QoS: Introduce boot parameter pm_qos_resume_latency_us config: powerpc64-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260123/202601231030.N1gaWeuj-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260123/202601231030.N1gaWeuj-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601231030.N1gaWeuj-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/power/qos.c:56:13: warning: 'pm_qos_resume_latency_cmdline' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] 56 | static char pm_qos_resume_latency_cmdline[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE] __initdata; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/pm_qos_resume_latency_cmdline +56 kernel/power/qos.c 55 > 56 static char pm_qos_resume_latency_cmdline[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE] __initdata; 57 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki