From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
<kbusch@kernel.org>, <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
<mahesh@linux.ibm.com>, <oohall@gmail.com>,
<terry.bowman@amd.com>, <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>,
<lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] PCI/DPC: Run recovery on device that detected the error
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:24:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260127102402.00004da2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260124074557.73961-3-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
On Sat, 24 Jan 2026 15:45:54 +0800
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> The current implementation of pcie_do_recovery() assumes that the
> recovery process is executed for the device that detected the error.
> However, the DPC driver currently passes the error port that experienced
> the DPC event to pcie_do_recovery().
>
> Use the SOURCE ID register to correctly identify the device that
> detected the error. When passing the error device, the
> pcie_do_recovery() will find the upstream bridge and walk bridges
> potentially AER affected. And subsequent commits will be able to
> accurately access AER status of the error device.
>
> Should not observe any functional changes.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.h | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c | 7 ++++---
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> index 0e67014aa001..58640e656897 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> @@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ struct rcec_ea {
> void pci_save_dpc_state(struct pci_dev *dev);
> void pci_restore_dpc_state(struct pci_dev *dev);
> void pci_dpc_init(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> -void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +struct pci_dev *dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> pci_ers_result_t dpc_reset_link(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> bool pci_dpc_recovered(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> unsigned int dpc_tlp_log_len(struct pci_dev *dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> index bff29726c6a5..f6069f621683 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> @@ -260,10 +260,20 @@ static int dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity(struct pci_dev *dev,
> return 1;
> }
>
> -void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +/**
> + * dpc_process_error - handle the DPC error status
> + * @pdev: the port that experienced the containment event
> + *
> + * Return: the device that detected the error.
> + *
> + * NOTE: The device reference count is increased, the caller must decrement
> + * the reference count by calling pci_dev_put().
> + */
> +struct pci_dev *dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
Maybe it makes sense to carry the err_port naming for the pci_dev
in here as well? Seems stronger than just relying on people
reading the documentation you've added.
> {
> u16 cap = pdev->dpc_cap, status, source, reason, ext_reason;
> struct aer_err_info info = {};
> + struct pci_dev *err_dev;
>
> pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS, &status);
>
> @@ -279,6 +289,7 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(pdev);
> pci_aer_clear_fatal_status(pdev);
> }
> + err_dev = pci_dev_get(pdev);
> break;
> case PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN_NFE:
> case PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN_FE:
> @@ -290,6 +301,8 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> "ERR_FATAL" : "ERR_NONFATAL",
> pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus), PCI_BUS_NUM(source),
> PCI_SLOT(source), PCI_FUNC(source));
> + err_dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus),
> + PCI_BUS_NUM(source), source & 0xff);
Bunch of replication in her with the pci_warn(). Maybe some local variables?
Maybe even rebuild the final parameter from PCI_DEVFN(slot, func) just to make the
association with the print really obvious?
Is there any chance that this might return NULL? Feels like maybe that's
only a possibility on a broken setup, but I'm not sure of all the wonderful
races around hotplug and DPC occurring before the OS has caught up.
> break;
> case PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN_IN_EXT:
> ext_reason = status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN_EXT;
> @@ -304,8 +317,11 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> if (ext_reason == PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN_RP_PIO &&
> pdev->dpc_rp_extensions)
> dpc_process_rp_pio_error(pdev);
> + err_dev = pci_dev_get(pdev);
> break;
> }
> +
> + return err_dev;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c
> index 521fca2f40cb..b6e9d652297e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static int acpi_send_edr_status(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct pci_dev *edev,
>
> static void edr_handle_event(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
> {
> - struct pci_dev *pdev = data, *err_port;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = data, *err_port, *err_dev;
> pci_ers_result_t estate = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
> u16 status;
>
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static void edr_handle_event(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
> goto send_ost;
> }
>
> - dpc_process_error(err_port);
> + err_dev = dpc_process_error(err_port);
> pci_aer_raw_clear_status(err_port);
>
> /*
> @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ static void edr_handle_event(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
> * or ERR_NONFATAL, since the link is already down, use the FATAL
> * error recovery path for both cases.
> */
> - estate = pcie_do_recovery(err_port, pci_channel_io_frozen, dpc_reset_link);
> + estate = pcie_do_recovery(err_dev, pci_channel_io_frozen, dpc_reset_link);
> + pci_dev_put(err_dev);
>
> send_ost:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-24 7:45 [PATCH v7 0/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] PCI/DPC: Clarify naming for error port in DPC Handling Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] PCI/DPC: Run recovery on device that detected the error Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:24 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-01-28 12:27 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 15:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-29 5:49 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-02 14:02 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-02 21:09 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-07 7:48 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-27 8:28 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-27 10:47 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-27 12:28 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-06 8:41 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:29 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 16:50 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-01-29 11:46 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] PCI/AER: Clear both AER fatal and non-fatal status Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:30 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 16:58 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-02-03 8:06 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-07 8:34 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] PCI/AER: Only clear error bits in pcie_clear_device_status() Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:45 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-03 7:44 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-06 8:12 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 17:01 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-01-29 12:09 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-03 7:53 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-06 7:39 ` Shuai Xue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260127102402.00004da2@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox