From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
<kbusch@kernel.org>, <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
<mahesh@linux.ibm.com>, <oohall@gmail.com>,
<terry.bowman@amd.com>, <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>,
<lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:36:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260127103643.00007991@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260124074557.73961-4-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
On Sat, 24 Jan 2026 15:45:55 +0800
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> The AER driver has historically avoided reading the configuration space of
> an endpoint or RCiEP that reported a fatal error, considering the link to
> that device unreliable. Consequently, when a fatal error occurs, the AER
> and DPC drivers do not report specific error types, resulting in logs like:
>
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: EDR event received
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: Reported EDR dev: 0015:00:00.0
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: DPC: containment event, status:0x200d, ERR_FATAL received from 0015:01:00.0
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: broadcast error_detected message
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: broadcast mmio_enabled message
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: broadcast resume message
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: pciehp: Slot(21): Link Down/Up ignored
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: device recovery successful
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: DPC port successfully recovered
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: Status for 0015:00:00.0: 0x80
>
> AER status registers are sticky and Write-1-to-clear. If the link recovered
> after hot reset, we can still safely access AER status and TLP header of the
> error device. In such case, report fatal errors which helps to figure out the
> error root case.
>
> After this patch, the logs like:
>
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: EDR event received
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: Reported EDR dev: 0015:00:00.0
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: DPC: containment event, status:0x200d, ERR_FATAL received from 0015:01:00.0
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: broadcast error_detected message
> + vfio-pci 0015:01:00.0: AER: Errors reported prior to reset
> + vfio-pci 0015:01:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrectable (Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Receiver ID)
> + vfio-pci 0015:01:00.0: device [144d:a80a] error status/mask=00001000/00400000
> + vfio-pci 0015:01:00.0: [12] TLP (First)
> + vfio-pci 0015:01:00.0: AER: TLP Header: 0x4a004010 0x00000040 0x01000000 0xffffffff
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: broadcast mmio_enabled message
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: broadcast resume message
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: pciehp: Slot(21): Link Down/Up ignored
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: device recovery successful
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: DPC port successfully recovered
> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: Status for 0015:00:00.0: 0x80
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Hi Shuai,
With the structure zeroed below (just to make this easier to review, not because
there is a bug as far as I can see)
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index e0bcaa896803..4c0a2bbe9197 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -1447,17 +1450,38 @@ int aer_get_device_error_info(struct aer_err_info *info, int i)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +void aer_report_frozen_error(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct aer_err_info info;
> + int type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
> +
> + if (type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT && type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END)
> + return;
> +
struct aer_err_info has a bunch of fields. I'd just make sure it's zeroed
to avoid us having to check that they are all filled in. = {};
or do it with the initial values being assigned.
info = (struct aer_err_info) {
.err_dev_num = 0,
.severity = AER_FATAL,
.level = KERN_ERR,
};
add_error_device(&info, dev);
> + info.error_dev_num = 0;
> + info.severity = AER_FATAL;
> + info.level = KERN_ERR;
> + add_error_device(&info, dev);
> +
> + if (aer_get_device_error_info(&info, 0, true)) {
> + pci_err(dev, "Errors reported prior to reset\n");
> + aer_print_error(&info, 0);
> + }
> +
> + pci_dev_put(dev); /* pairs with pci_dev_get() in add_error_device() */
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-24 7:45 [PATCH v7 0/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] PCI/DPC: Clarify naming for error port in DPC Handling Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] PCI/DPC: Run recovery on device that detected the error Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:27 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 15:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-29 5:49 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-02 14:02 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-02 21:09 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-07 7:48 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-27 8:28 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-27 10:47 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-27 12:28 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-06 8:41 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:36 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-01-28 12:29 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 16:50 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-01-29 11:46 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] PCI/AER: Clear both AER fatal and non-fatal status Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:30 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 16:58 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-02-03 8:06 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-07 8:34 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] PCI/AER: Only clear error bits in pcie_clear_device_status() Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:45 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-03 7:44 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-06 8:12 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 17:01 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-01-29 12:09 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-03 7:53 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-06 7:39 ` Shuai Xue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260127103643.00007991@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox