[PATCH net-next v4 2/2] selftests: net: add ICMP error source address test over xfrm tunnel

[PATCH net-next v4 2/2] selftests: net: add ICMP error source address test over xfrm tunnel

[Antony Antony]

Test that ICMP error messages generated by an IPsec gateway use
the correct source address (the gateway's address, not the
unreachable destination).

Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
---
v1->v2 : add kernel selftest script
v2->v3 : fix test script. The IFS, space, got mangled.
v3->v4 : added MTU tests
       - fix test script based on reviews
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile      |   1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_state.sh | 578 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 579 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_state.sh

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
index afdea6d95bde..c8f4d5e19d19 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ TEST_PROGS := \
 	vrf_route_leaking.sh \
 	vrf_strict_mode_test.sh \
 	xfrm_policy.sh \
+	xfrm_state.sh \
 # end of TEST_PROGS

 TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := \
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_state.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_state.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..c820c68c85fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_state.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,578 @@
+#!/bin/bash -e
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#
+# xfrm/IPsec tests.
+# Currently implemented:
+# - ICMP error source address verification (IETF RFC 4301 section 6)
+# - ICMP MTU exceeded handling over IPsec tunnels.
+#
+# Addresses and topology:
+# IPv4 prefix 10.1.c.d  IPv6 prefix fc00:c::d/64 where c is the segment number
+# and d is the interface identifier.
+# IPv6 uses the same c:d as IPv4, and start with IPv6 prefix instead ipv4 prefix
+#
+# Network topology default: ns_set_v4 or ns_set_v6
+#   1.1   1.2   2.1   2.2   3.1   3.2   4.1   4.2   5.1   5.2  6.1  6.2
+#  eth0  eth1  eth0  eth1  eth0  eth1  eth0  eth1  eth0  eth1 eth0  eth1
+# a -------- r1 -------- s1 -------- r2 -------- s2 -------- r3 -------- b
+# a, b = Alice and Bob hosts without IPsec.
+# r1, r2, r3 routers, without IPsec
+# s1, s2, IPsec gateways/routers that setup tunnel(s).
+
+# Network topology x: IPsec gateway that generates ICMP response - ns_set_v4x or ns_set_v6x
+#   1.1   1.2   2.1   2.2   3.1   3.2   4.1   4.2   5.1   5.2
+#  eth0  eth1  eth0  eth1  eth0  eth1  eth0  eth1  eth0  eth1
+# a -------- r1 -------- s1 -------- r2 -------- s2 -------- b
+
+source lib.sh
+
+EXIT_ON_TEST_FAIL=no
+PAUSE=no
+VERBOSE=${VERBOSE:-0}
+
+#               Name                          Description
+tests="
+	unreachable_ipv4		IPv4 unreachable from router r3
+	unreachable_ipv6		IPv6 unreachable from router r3
+	unreachable_gw_ipv4		IPv4 unreachable from IPsec gateway s2
+	unreachable_gw_ipv6		IPv6 unreachable from IPsec gateway s2
+	mtu_ipv4_s2			IPv4 MTU exceeded from IPsec gateway s2
+	mtu_ipv6_s2			IPv6 MTU exceeded from IPsec gateway s2
+	mtu_ipv4_r2			IPv4 MTU exceeded from ESP router r2
+	mtu_ipv6_r2			IPv6 MTU exceeded from ESP router r2
+	mtu_ipv4_r3			IPv4 MTU exceeded from router r3
+	mtu_ipv6_r3			IPv6 MTU exceeded from router r3"
+
+prefix4="10.1"
+prefix6="fc00"
+
+run_cmd_err() {
+	cmd="$*"
+
+	if [ "$VERBOSE" -gt 0 ]; then
+		printf "    COMMAND: $cmd\n"
+	fi
+
+	out="$($cmd 2>&1)" && rc=0 || rc=$?
+	if [ "$VERBOSE" -gt 1 ] && [ -n "$out" ]; then
+		echo "    $out"
+		echo
+	fi
+	return 0
+}
+
+run_cmd() {
+	run_cmd_err "$@" || exit 1
+}
+
+run_test() {
+	# If errexit is set, unset it for sub-shell and restore after test
+	errexit=0
+	if [[ $- =~ "e" ]]; then
+		errexit=1
+		set +e
+	fi
+
+	(
+		tname="$1"
+		tdesc="$2"
+
+		unset IFS
+
+		fail="yes"
+
+		# Since cleanup() relies on variables modified by this sub shell,
+		# it has to run in this context.
+		trap 'log_test_error $?; cleanup' EXIT INT TERM
+
+		if [ "$VERBOSE" -gt 0 ]; then
+			printf "\n#############################################################\n\n"
+		fi
+
+		ret=0
+		eval test_${tname}
+		ret=$?
+
+		if [ $ret -eq 0 ]; then
+			fail="no"
+			printf "TEST: %-60s [ PASS ]\n" "${tdesc}"
+		elif [ $ret -eq $ksft_skip ]; then
+			fail="no"
+			printf "TEST: %-60s [SKIP]\n" "${tdesc}"
+		fi
+
+		return $ret
+	)
+	ret=$?
+
+	[ $errexit -eq 1 ] && set -e
+
+	case $ret in
+	0)
+		all_skipped=false
+		[ $exitcode -eq $ksft_skip ] && exitcode=0
+		;;
+	$ksft_skip)
+		[ $all_skipped = true ] && exitcode=$ksft_skip
+		;;
+	*)
+		all_skipped=false
+		exitcode=1
+		;;
+	esac
+
+	return 0 # don't trigger errexit (-e); actual status in exitcode
+}
+
+# Find the auto-generated name for this namespace
+nsname() {
+	eval echo ns_$1
+}
+
+nscmd() {
+	eval echo "ip netns exec $1"
+}
+
+setup_namespaces() {
+	local namespaces=""
+
+	NS_A=""
+	NS_B=""
+	NS_R1=""
+	NS_R2=""
+	NS_R3=""
+	NS_S1=""
+	NS_S2=""
+
+	local namespaces=""
+	for ns in ${ns_set}; do
+		namespaces="$namespaces NS_${ns^^}"
+	done
+
+	setup_ns $namespaces
+
+	ns_active= #ordered list of namespaces for this test.
+
+	[ -n "${NS_A}" ] && ns_a="ip netns exec ${NS_A}" && ns_active="${ns_active} $NS_A"
+	[ -n "${NS_R1}" ] && ns_r1="ip netns exec ${NS_R1}" && ns_active="${ns_active} $NS_R1"
+	[ -n "${NS_S1}" ] && ns_s1="ip netns exec ${NS_S1}" && ns_active="${ns_active} $NS_S1"
+	[ -n "${NS_R2}" ] && ns_r2="ip netns exec ${NS_R2}" && ns_active="${ns_active} $NS_R2"
+	[ -n "${NS_S2}" ] && ns_s2="ip netns exec ${NS_S2}" && ns_active="${ns_active} $NS_S2"
+	[ -n "${NS_R3}" ] && ns_r3="ip netns exec ${NS_R3}" && ns_active="${ns_active} $NS_R3"
+	[ -n "${NS_B}" ] && ns_b="ip netns exec ${NS_B}" && ns_active="${ns_active} $NS_B"
+}
+
+addr_add() {
+	local ns_cmd=$(nscmd $1)
+	local ip="$2"
+	local dev="$3"
+
+	run_cmd ${ns_cmd} ip addr add ${ip} dev ${dev}
+	run_cmd ${ns_cmd} ip link set up ${dev}
+}
+
+veth_add() {
+	local ns=$2
+	local pns=$1
+	local ns_cmd=$(nscmd ${pns})
+	local ln="eth0"
+	local rn="eth1"
+	run_cmd ${ns_cmd} ip link add ${ln} type veth peer name ${rn} netns $ns
+}
+
+setup_icmp_filter() {
+	local ns_cmd="${1:-${ns_r2}}"
+
+	run_cmd ${ns_cmd} nft add table inet filter
+	run_cmd ${ns_cmd} nft add chain inet filter FORWARD \
+		{ type filter hook forward priority filter\; policy drop \; }
+	run_cmd ${ns_cmd} nft add rule inet filter FORWARD counter ip protocol esp \
+		counter log accept
+	run_cmd ${ns_cmd} nft add rule inet filter FORWARD counter ip protocol \
+		icmp counter log drop
+
+	if [ "$VERBOSE" -gt 0 ]; then
+		run_cmd ${ns_cmd} nft list ruleset
+		echo "$out"
+	fi
+}
+
+setup_icmpv6_filter() {
+	local ns_cmd=${ns_r2}
+
+	run_cmd ${ns_cmd} nft add table inet filter
+	run_cmd ${ns_cmd} nft add chain inet filter FORWARD { type filter \
+		hook forward priority filter\; policy drop \; }
+	run_cmd ${ns_cmd} nft add rule inet filter FORWARD ip6 nexthdr \
+		ipv6-icmp icmpv6 type echo-request counter log drop
+	run_cmd ${ns_cmd} nft add rule inet filter FORWARD ip6 nexthdr esp \
+		counter log accept
+	run_cmd ${ns_cmd} nft add rule inet filter FORWARD ip6 nexthdr \
+		ipv6-icmp icmpv6 type {nd-neighbor-solicit,nd-neighbor-advert, \
+				       nd-router-solicit,nd-router-advert} counter log drop
+	if [ "$VERBOSE" -gt 0 ]; then
+		run_cmd ${ns_cmd} nft list ruleset
+		echo "$out"
+	fi
+}
+
+ns_set() {
+	s1_src=${src}
+	s1_dst=${dst}
+	s1_src_net=${src_net}
+	s1_dst_net=${dst_net}
+}
+
+setup_ns_set_v4() {
+	ns_set="a r1 s1 r2 s2 r3 b"    # Network topology default
+	imax=$(echo "$ns_set" | wc -w) # number of namespaces in this topology
+
+	src="10.1.3.1"
+	dst="10.1.4.2"
+	src_net="10.1.1.0/24"
+	dst_net="10.1.6.0/24"
+
+	prefix=${prefix4}
+	prefix_len=24
+	s="."
+	S="."
+
+	ns_set
+}
+
+setup_ns_set_v4x() {
+	ns_set="a r1 s1 r2 s2 b"       # Network topology: x
+	imax=$(echo "$ns_set" | wc -w) # number of namespaces in this topology
+	prefix=${prefix4}
+	s="."
+	S="."
+	src="10.1.3.1"
+	dst="10.1.4.2"
+	src_net="10.1.1.0/24"
+	dst_net="10.1.5.0/24"
+	prefix_len=24
+
+	ns_set
+}
+
+setup_ns_set_v6() {
+	ns_set="a r1 s1 r2 s2 r3 b"    # Network topology default
+	imax=$(echo "$ns_set" | wc -w) # number of namespaces in this topology
+	prefix=${prefix6}
+	s=":"
+	S="::"
+	src="fc00:3::1"
+	dst="fc00:4::2"
+	src_net="fc00:1::0/64"
+	dst_net="fc00:6::0/64"
+	prefix_len=64
+
+	ns_set
+}
+
+setup_ns_set_v6x() {
+	ns_set="a r1 s1 r2 s2 b" # Network topology: x
+	imax=6
+	prefix=${prefix6}
+	s=":"
+	S="::"
+	src="fc00:3::1"
+	dst="fc00:4::2"
+	src_net="fc00:1::0/64"
+	dst_net="fc00:5::0/64"
+	prefix_len=64
+
+	ns_set
+}
+
+setup_network() {
+	# Create veths and add addresses
+	i=1
+	p=""
+	for ns in ${ns_active}; do
+		ns_cmd=$(nscmd ${ns})
+
+		if [ ${i} -ne 1 ]; then
+			# Create veth between previous and current namespace
+			veth_add ${p} ${ns}
+			# Add addresses: previous gets .1 on eth0, current gets .2 on eth1
+			addr_add ${p} "${prefix}${s}$((i-1))${S}1/${prefix_len}" eth0
+			addr_add ${ns} "${prefix}${s}$((i-1))${S}2/${prefix_len}" eth1
+		fi
+
+		# Enable forwarding
+		run_cmd ${ns_cmd} sysctl -q net/ipv4/ip_forward=1
+		run_cmd ${ns_cmd} sysctl -q net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding=1
+		run_cmd ${ns_cmd} sysctl -q net/ipv6/conf/default/accept_dad=0
+
+		p=${ns}
+		i=$((i + 1))
+	done
+
+	# Add routes (needs all addresses to exist first)
+	i=1
+	for ns in ${ns_active}; do
+		ns_cmd=$(nscmd ${ns})
+
+		# Forward routes to networks beyond this node
+		if [ ${i} -ne ${imax} ]; then
+			nhf="${prefix}${s}${i}${S}2" # nexthop forward
+			for j in $(seq $((i + 1)) ${imax}); do
+				run_cmd ${ns_cmd} ip route replace \
+				       	"${prefix}${s}${j}${S}0/${prefix_len}" via ${nhf}
+			done
+		fi
+
+		# Reverse routes to networks before this node
+		if [ ${i} -gt 1 ]; then
+			nhr="${prefix}${s}$((i-1))${S}1" # nexthop reverse
+			for j in $(seq 1 $((i - 2))); do
+				run_cmd ${ns_cmd} ip route replace \
+					"${prefix}${s}${j}${S}0/${prefix_len}" via ${nhr}
+			done
+		fi
+
+		i=$((i + 1))
+	done
+}
+
+setup_xfrm_mode() {
+	local MODE=${1:-tunnel}
+	if [ "${MODE}" != "tunnel" ] && [ "${MODE}" != "beet" ]; then
+		echo "xfrm mode ${MODE} not supported"
+		log_test_error
+		return 1
+	fi
+
+	run_cmd ${ns_s1} ip xfrm policy add src ${s1_src_net} dst ${s1_dst_net} dir out \
+		tmpl src ${s1_src} dst ${s1_dst} proto esp reqid 1 mode ${MODE}
+
+	# no "input" policies. we are only doing forwarding so far
+
+	run_cmd ${ns_s1} ip xfrm policy add src ${s1_dst_net} dst ${s1_src_net} dir fwd \
+		flag icmp tmpl src ${s1_dst} dst ${s1_src} proto esp reqid 2 mode ${MODE}
+
+	run_cmd ${ns_s1} ip xfrm state add src ${s1_src} dst ${s1_dst} proto esp spi 1 \
+		reqid 1 mode ${MODE} aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' \
+		0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 96 \
+		sel src ${s1_src_net} dst ${s1_dst_net} dir out
+
+	run_cmd ${ns_s1} ip xfrm state add src ${s1_dst} dst ${s1_src} proto esp spi 2 \
+		reqid 2 flag icmp replay-window 8 mode ${MODE} aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' \
+		0x2222222222222222222222222222222222222222 96 \
+		sel src ${s1_dst_net} dst ${s1_src_net} dir in
+
+	run_cmd ${ns_s2} ip xfrm policy add src ${s1_dst_net} dst ${s1_src_net} dir out \
+		flag icmp tmpl src ${s1_dst} dst ${s1_src} proto esp reqid 2 mode ${MODE}
+
+	run_cmd ${ns_s2} ip xfrm policy add src ${s1_src_net} dst ${s1_dst_net} dir fwd \
+		tmpl src ${s1_src} dst ${s1_dst} proto esp reqid 1 mode ${MODE}
+
+	run_cmd ${ns_s2} ip xfrm state add src ${s1_dst} dst ${s1_src} proto esp spi 2 \
+		reqid 2 mode ${MODE} aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' \
+		0x2222222222222222222222222222222222222222 96 \
+		sel src ${s1_dst_net} dst ${s1_src_net} dir out
+
+	run_cmd ${ns_s2} ip xfrm state add src ${s1_src} dst ${s1_dst} proto esp spi 1 \
+		reqid 1 flag icmp replay-window 8 mode ${MODE} aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' \
+		0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 96 \
+		sel src ${s1_src_net} dst ${s1_dst_net} dir in
+}
+
+setup_xfrm() {
+	setup_xfrm_mode tunnel
+}
+
+setup() {
+	[ "$(id -u)" -ne 0 ] && echo "  need to run as root" && return $ksft_skip
+
+	for arg; do
+		eval setup_${arg} || {
+			echo "  ${arg} not supported"
+			return 1
+		}
+	done
+}
+
+pause() {
+	echo
+	echo "Pausing. Hit enter to continue"
+	read a
+}
+
+log_test_error() {
+	if [ "${fail}" = "yes" -a -n "${tdesc}" ]; then
+		printf "TEST: %-60s [ FAIL ]  ${name}\n" "${tdesc}"
+		[ -n "${cmd}" ] && echo -e "${cmd}\n"
+		[ -n "${out}" ] && echo -e "${out}\n"
+	fi
+}
+
+cleanup() {
+	[[ "$PAUSE" = "always" || ( "$PAUSE" = "fail" && "$fail" = "yes" ) ]] && pause
+	cleanup_all_ns
+	[ "${EXIT_ON_TEST_FAIL}" = "yes" -a "${fail}" = "yes" ] && exit 1
+}
+
+test_unreachable_ipv6() {
+	setup ns_set_v6 namespaces network xfrm icmpv6_filter || return $ksft_skip
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 fc00:6::2
+	run_cmd_err ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 fc00:6::3
+	rc=0
+	echo -e "$out" | grep -q -E 'From fc00:5::2 icmp_seq.* Destination' || rc=1
+	return ${rc}
+}
+
+test_unreachable_gw_ipv6() {
+	setup ns_set_v6x namespaces network xfrm icmpv6_filter || return $ksft_skip
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 fc00:5::2
+	run_cmd_err ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 fc00:5::3
+	rc=0
+	echo -e "$out" | grep -q -E 'From fc00:4::2 icmp_seq.* Destination' || rc=1
+	return ${rc}
+}
+
+test_unreachable_ipv4() {
+	setup ns_set_v4 namespaces network icmp_filter xfrm || return $ksft_skip
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 10.1.6.2
+	run_cmd_err ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 10.1.6.3
+	rc=0
+	echo -e "$out" | grep -q -E 'From 10.1.5.2 icmp_seq.* Destination' || rc=1
+	return ${rc}
+}
+
+test_unreachable_gw_ipv4() {
+	setup ns_set_v4x namespaces network icmp_filter xfrm || return $ksft_skip
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 10.1.5.2
+	run_cmd_err ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 10.1.5.3
+	rc=0
+	echo -e "$out" | grep -q -E 'From 10.1.4.2 icmp_seq.* Destination' || rc=1
+	return ${rc}
+}
+
+test_mtu_ipv4_r2() {
+	setup ns_set_v4 namespaces network icmp_filter xfrm || return $ksft_skip
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 10.1.6.2
+	run_cmd ${ns_r2} ip route replace 10.1.3.0/24 dev eth1 src 10.1.3.2 mtu 1300
+	run_cmd ${ns_r2} ip route replace 10.1.4.0/24 dev eth0 src 10.1.4.1 mtu 1300
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -M do -s 1300 -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 10.1.6.2 || true
+	rc=0
+	echo -e "$out" | grep -q -E "From 10.1.2.2 icmp_seq=.* Frag needed and DF set" || rc=1
+	return ${rc}
+}
+
+test_mtu_ipv6_r2() {
+	setup ns_set_v6 namespaces network xfrm icmpv6_filter || return $ksft_skip
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 fc00:6::2
+	run_cmd ${ns_r2} ip -6 route replace fc00:3::/64 dev eth1 metric 256 src fc00:3::2 mtu 1300
+	run_cmd ${ns_r2} ip -6 route replace fc00:4::/64 dev eth0 metric 256 src fc00:4::1 mtu 1300
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -M do -s 1300 -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 fc00:6::2 || true
+	rc=0
+	echo -e "$out" | grep -q -E "From fc00:2::2 icmp_seq=.* Packet too big: mtu=1230" || rc=1
+	return ${rc}
+}
+
+test_mtu_ipv4_r3() {
+	setup ns_set_v4 namespaces network icmp_filter xfrm || return $ksft_skip
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 10.1.6.2
+	run_cmd ${ns_r3} ip route replace 10.1.6.0/24 dev eth0 mtu 1300
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -M do -s 1350 -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 10.1.6.2 || true
+	rc=0
+	echo -e "$out" | grep -q -E "From 10.1.5.2 .* Frag needed and DF set \(mtu = 1300\)" || rc=1
+	return ${rc}
+}
+
+test_mtu_ipv4_s2() {
+	setup ns_set_v4x namespaces network icmp_filter xfrm || return $ksft_skip
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 10.1.5.2
+	run_cmd ${ns_s2} ip route replace 10.1.5.0/24 dev eth0 src 10.1.5.1 mtu 1300
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -M do -s 1350 -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 10.1.5.2 || true
+	rc=0
+	echo -e "$out" | grep -q -E "From 10.1.4.2.*Frag needed and DF set \(mtu = 1300\)" || rc=1
+	return ${rc}
+}
+
+test_mtu_ipv6_s2() {
+	setup ns_set_v6x namespaces network xfrm icmpv6_filter || return $ksft_skip
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 fc00:5::2
+	run_cmd ${ns_s2} ip -6 route replace fc00:5::/64 dev eth0 metric 256 mtu 1300
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -M do -s 1350 -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 fc00:5::2 || true
+	rc=0
+	echo -e "$out" | grep -q -E "From fc00:4::2.*Packet too big: mtu=1300" || rc=1
+	return ${rc}
+}
+
+test_mtu_ipv6_r3() {
+	setup ns_set_v6 namespaces network xfrm icmpv6_filter || return $ksft_skip
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 fc00:6::2
+	run_cmd ${ns_r3} ip -6 route replace fc00:6::/64 dev eth1 metric 256 mtu 1300
+	run_cmd ${ns_a} ping -M do -s 1300 -W 5 -w 4 -c 1 fc00:6::2 || true
+	rc=0
+	echo -e "$out" | grep -q -E "From fc00:5::2 icmp_seq=.* Packet too big: mtu=1300" || rc=1
+	return ${rc}
+}
+
+################################################################################
+#
+usage() {
+	echo
+	echo "$0 [OPTIONS] [TEST]..."
+	echo "If no TEST argument is given, all tests will be run."
+	echo
+	echo -e "\t-p Pause on fail. Namespaces are kept for diagnostics"
+	echo -e "\t-P Pause after the test. Namespaces are kept for diagnostics"
+	echo -e "\t-v Verbose output. Show commands; -vv Show output also"
+	echo "Available tests${tests}"
+	exit 1
+}
+
+################################################################################
+#
+exitcode=0
+all_skipped=true
+out=
+cmd=
+
+while getopts :epPv o; do
+	case $o in
+	e) EXIT_ON_TEST_FAIL=yes ;;
+	P) PAUSE=always ;;
+	p) PAUSE=fail ;;
+	v) VERBOSE=$((VERBOSE + 1)) ;;
+	*) usage ;;
+	esac
+done
+shift $(($OPTIND - 1))
+
+IFS=$'\t\n'
+
+for arg; do
+	# Check first that all requested tests are available before running any
+	command -v "test_${arg}" >/dev/null || {
+		echo "=== Test ${arg} not found"
+		usage
+	}
+done
+
+name=""
+desc=""
+fail="no"
+
+for t in ${tests}; do
+	[ "${name}" = "" ] && name="${t}" && continue
+	[ "${desc}" = "" ] && desc="${t}"
+
+	run_this=1
+	for arg; do
+		[ "${arg}" != "${arg#--*}" ] && continue
+		[ "${arg}" = "${name}" ] && run_this=1 && break
+		run_this=0
+	done
+	if [ $run_this -eq 1 ]; then
+		run_test "${name}" "${desc}"
+	fi
+	name=""
+	desc=""
+done
+
+exit ${exitcode}
--
2.39.5

Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] selftests: net: add ICMP error source address test over xfrm tunnel

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 11:20:45 +0100 Antony Antony wrote:
> Test that ICMP error messages generated by an IPsec gateway use
> the correct source address (the gateway's address, not the
> unreachable destination).

could you check / fix shellcheck warnings?

+In xfrm_state.sh line 115:
+	$ksft_skip)
+        ^--------^ SC2254 (warning): Quote expansions in case patterns to match literally rather than as a glob.

+In xfrm_state.sh line 157:
+	[ -n "${NS_R1}" ] && ns_r1="ip netns exec ${NS_R1}" && ns_active="${ns_active} $NS_R1"
+                             ^---^ SC2034 (warning): ns_r1 appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally).
+
+
+In xfrm_state.sh line 162:
+	[ -n "${NS_B}" ] && ns_b="ip netns exec ${NS_B}" && ns_active="${ns_active} $NS_B"
+                            ^--^ SC2034 (warning): ns_b appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally).

+In xfrm_state.sh line 166:
+	local ns_cmd=$(nscmd $1)
+              ^----^ SC2155 (warning): Declare and assign separately to avoid masking return values.
-- 
pw-bot: cr

Re: [devel-ipsec] Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] selftests: net: add ICMP error source address test over xfrm tunnel

[Antony Antony]

On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 06:43:18PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski via Devel wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 11:20:45 +0100 Antony Antony wrote:
> > Test that ICMP error messages generated by an IPsec gateway use
> > the correct source address (the gateway's address, not the
> > unreachable destination).
> 
> could you check / fix shellcheck warnings?

lots of warnings. It looks like x-mas lights are still on:)

> 
> +In xfrm_state.sh line 115:
> +	$ksft_skip)
> +        ^--------^ SC2254 (warning): Quote expansions in case patterns to match literally rather than as a glob.

I will add quotes to. Thare 30-40 of those!  

> 
> +In xfrm_state.sh line 157:
> +	[ -n "${NS_R1}" ] && ns_r1="ip netns exec ${NS_R1}" && ns_active="${ns_active} $NS_R1"
> +                             ^---^ SC2034 (warning): ns_r1 appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally).
> +
> +
> +In xfrm_state.sh line 162:
> +	[ -n "${NS_B}" ] && ns_b="ip netns exec ${NS_B}" && ns_active="${ns_active} $NS_B"
> +                            ^--^ SC2034 (warning): ns_b appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally).
> 
> +In xfrm_state.sh line 166:
> +	local ns_cmd=$(nscmd $1)
> +              ^----^ SC2155 (warning): Declare and assign separately to avoid masking return values.

other shell checks are harder to fix.

+In xfrm_state.sh line 417:
test_unreachable_ipv6() {
^-- SC2329 (info): This function is never invoked. Check usage (or ignored 
if invoked indirectly).

those are invoked indirectly.  eval code I would like to keep. Would that 
work for you? are you aiming fori strictly zero warnings?

regards,
-antony

[PATCH net-next v4 1/2] icmp: fix ICMP error source address when xfrm policy matches

[Antony Antony]

When an IPsec gateway generates an ICMP error (e.g., Destination Host
Unreachable), the source address incorrectly shows the unreachable
destination instead of the gateway's address. IPv6 behaves correctly.

Before fix:
  ping 10.1.6.3
  From 10.1.6.3 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
  (wrong - 10.1.6.3 is the unreachable host)

After fix:
  ping 10.1.6.3
  From 10.1.5.2 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
  (correct - 10.1.5.2 is the gateway)

The fix removes the memcpy that overwrote fl4 with fl4_dec after
xfrm_lookup(). A follow-up commit adds a selftest.

Fixes: 415b3334a21a ("icmp: Fix regression in nexthop resolution during replies.")
Cc: stable+noautosel@kernel.org # Avoid false positives in tests
Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
Acked-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>
---
 net/ipv4/icmp.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/icmp.c b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
index 19c9c838967f..4bd421208ce0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
@@ -569,7 +569,6 @@ static struct rtable *icmp_route_lookup(struct net *net, struct flowi4 *fl4,
 	rt2 = dst_rtable(dst2);
 	if (!IS_ERR(dst2)) {
 		dst_release(&rt->dst);
-		memcpy(fl4, &fl4_dec, sizeof(*fl4));
 		rt = rt2;
 	} else if (PTR_ERR(dst2) == -EPERM) {
 		if (rt)
--
2.39.5

Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] icmp: fix ICMP error source address when xfrm policy matches

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 11:25:14 +0100 Antony Antony wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] icmp: fix ICMP error source address when xfrm policy matches

> Fixes: 415b3334a21a ("icmp: Fix regression in nexthop resolution during replies.")
> Cc: stable+noautosel@kernel.org # Avoid false positives in tests

I don't understand what you're trying to express with all these tags.
We are sending incorrect ICMP packets, seems like a normal net-worthy
fix to me?

Re: [devel-ipsec] Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] icmp: fix ICMP error source address when xfrm policy matches

[Antony Antony]

Hi Jakub,

On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 06:45:10PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski via Devel wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 11:25:14 +0100 Antony Antony wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] icmp: fix ICMP error source address when xfrm policy matches
> 
> > Fixes: 415b3334a21a ("icmp: Fix regression in nexthop resolution during replies.")
> > Cc: stable+noautosel@kernel.org # Avoid false positives in tests
> 
> I don't understand what you're trying to express with all these tags.
> We are sending incorrect ICMP packets, seems like a normal net-worthy
> fix to me?

You're right that we're sending incorrect ICMP packets when IPsec/xfrm is 
enabled and this is a legitimate fix. My concern with backporting is about 
potential disruption rather than the correctness of the fix itself.
The issue is that some existing test scripts and monitoring tools may have
hardcoded expectations for the current(incorrect) source address behavior.  
When this one-line fix gets backported to all maintained kernels, those 
tests would start failing, potentially triggering regression reports and 
requests to revert the fix from stable kernels.

Additionally, without the
commit 63b21caba17e ("xfrm: introduce forwarding of ICMP Error messages") 
being present in older kernels, the behavior change could be viewed 
differently in stable branches.

This is also the sense I got from IPsec users.
Given these considerations, I opted for the safer path of targeting net-next
with stable+noautosel, no backporting.

-antony

Re: [devel-ipsec] Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] icmp: fix ICMP error source address when xfrm policy matches

[Paul Wouters]

On Mon, 2 Feb 2026, Antony Antony via Devel wrote:

> Hi Jakub,
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 06:45:10PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski via Devel wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 11:25:14 +0100 Antony Antony wrote:
>>> Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] icmp: fix ICMP error source address when xfrm policy matches
>>
>>> Fixes: 415b3334a21a ("icmp: Fix regression in nexthop resolution during replies.")
>>> Cc: stable+noautosel@kernel.org # Avoid false positives in tests
>>
>> I don't understand what you're trying to express with all these tags.
>> We are sending incorrect ICMP packets, seems like a normal net-worthy
>> fix to me?
>
> You're right that we're sending incorrect ICMP packets when IPsec/xfrm is
> enabled and this is a legitimate fix. My concern with backporting is about
> potential disruption rather than the correctness of the fix itself.
> The issue is that some existing test scripts and monitoring tools may have
> hardcoded expectations for the current(incorrect) source address behavior.
> When this one-line fix gets backported to all maintained kernels, those
> tests would start failing, potentially triggering regression reports and
> requests to revert the fix from stable kernels.
>
> Additionally, without the
> commit 63b21caba17e ("xfrm: introduce forwarding of ICMP Error messages")
> being present in older kernels, the behavior change could be viewed
> differently in stable branches.
>
> This is also the sense I got from IPsec users.
> Given these considerations, I opted for the safer path of targeting net-next
> with stable+noautosel, no backporting.

libreswan is unaffected, other than the old code showing a weird
unexplainable log message.  So we are not really affected by whether or
not this get backported. We would slightly prefer the backport just to
get proper icmp messages out there (and we might need to fix a few test
cases but that is okay with us). If someone reaches out with strong
arguments to not backport, we would be fine with not doing it.

Paul

Re: [devel-ipsec] Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] icmp: fix ICMP error source address when xfrm policy matches

[Tobias Brunner]

On 02.02.26 15:53, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2026, Antony Antony via Devel wrote:
> 
>> Hi Jakub,
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 06:45:10PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski via Devel wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 11:25:14 +0100 Antony Antony wrote:
>>>> Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] icmp: fix ICMP error source address when xfrm policy matches
>>>
>>>> Fixes: 415b3334a21a ("icmp: Fix regression in nexthop resolution during replies.")
>>>> Cc: stable+noautosel@kernel.org # Avoid false positives in tests
>>>
>>> I don't understand what you're trying to express with all these tags.
>>> We are sending incorrect ICMP packets, seems like a normal net-worthy
>>> fix to me?
>>
>> You're right that we're sending incorrect ICMP packets when IPsec/xfrm is
>> enabled and this is a legitimate fix. My concern with backporting is about
>> potential disruption rather than the correctness of the fix itself.
>> The issue is that some existing test scripts and monitoring tools may have
>> hardcoded expectations for the current(incorrect) source address behavior.
>> When this one-line fix gets backported to all maintained kernels, those
>> tests would start failing, potentially triggering regression reports and
>> requests to revert the fix from stable kernels.
>>
>> Additionally, without the
>> commit 63b21caba17e ("xfrm: introduce forwarding of ICMP Error messages")
>> being present in older kernels, the behavior change could be viewed
>> differently in stable branches.
>>
>> This is also the sense I got from IPsec users.
>> Given these considerations, I opted for the safer path of targeting net-next
>> with stable+noautosel, no backporting.
> 
> libreswan is unaffected, other than the old code showing a weird
> unexplainable log message.  So we are not really affected by whether or
> not this get backported. We would slightly prefer the backport just to
> get proper icmp messages out there (and we might need to fix a few test
> cases but that is okay with us). If someone reaches out with strong
> arguments to not backport, we would be fine with not doing it.

I think the main concern is that without Antony's patch that adds ICMP
forwarding via reverse lookup (63b21caba17e ("xfrm: introduce forwarding
of ICMP Error messages")), which was not backported, packets with the
correct source IP will not get tunneled if the gateway's IP is not
contained in the traffic selectors.  So if at all, backporting should
only be considered to v6.9+ and not anything earlier (the commit
Antony's Fixes tag references, 415b3334a21a, was released with v3.1).

Regards,
Tobias