public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support
@ 2026-02-02 14:40 Leon Hwang
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/9] " Leon Hwang
                   ` (8 more replies)
  0 siblings, 9 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-02 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Leon Hwang, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing,
	Tao Chen, Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Anton Protopopov, Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api,
	linux-kselftest, kernel-patches-bot

This patch series builds upon the discussion in
"[PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] bpf: Improve error reporting for freplace attachment failure" [1].

This patch series introduces support for *common attributes* in the BPF
syscall, providing a unified mechanism for passing shared metadata across
all BPF commands.

The initial set of common attributes includes:

1. 'log_buf': User-provided buffer for storing log output.
2. 'log_size': Size of the provided log buffer.
3. 'log_level': Verbosity level for logging.
4. 'log_true_size': The size of log reported by kernel.

With this extension, the BPF syscall will be able to return meaningful
error messages (e.g., failures of creating map), improving debuggability
and user experience.

Links:
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250224153352.64689-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

Changes:
v8 -> v9:
* Rework reporting 'log_true_size' for prog_load, btf_load, and map_create to
  simplify struct bpf_log_attr (per Alexei).
* v8: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260126151409.52072-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

v7 -> v8:
* Return 0 when fd < 0 and errno != EFAULT in probe_sys_bpf_ext(), then simplify
  probe_bpf_syscall_common_attrs() (per Alexei and Andrii).
* v7: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260123032445.125259-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

v6 -> v7:
* Return -errno when fd < 0 and errno != EFAULT in probe_sys_bpf_ext().
* Convert return value of probe_sys_bpf_ext() to bool in
  probe_bpf_syscall_common_attrs().
* Address comments from Andrii:
  * Drop the comment, and handle fd >= 0 case explicitly in
    probe_sys_bpf_ext().
  * Return an error when fd >= 0 in probe_sys_bpf_ext().
* v6: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260120152424.40766-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

v5 -> v6:
* Address comments from Andrii:
  * Update some variables' name.
  * Drop unnecessary 'close(fd)' in libbpf.
  * Rename FEAT_EXTENDED_SYSCALL to FEAT_BPF_SYSCALL_COMMON_ATTRS with
    updated description in libbpf.
  * Use EINVAL instead of EUSERS, as EUSERS is not used in bpf yet.
  * Rename struct bpf_syscall_common_attr_opts to bpf_log_opts in libbpf.
  * Add 'OPTS_SET(log_opts, log_true_size, 0);' in libbpf's 'bpf_map_create()'.
* v5: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260112145616.44195-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

v4 -> v5:
* Rework reporting 'log_true_size' for prog_load, btf_load, and map_create
  (per Alexei).
* v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260106172018.57757-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

RFC v3 -> v4:
* Drop RFC.
* Address comments from Andrii:
  * Add parentheses in 'sys_bpf_ext()'.
  * Avoid creating new fd in 'probe_sys_bpf_ext()'.
  * Add a new struct to wrap log fields in libbpf.
* Address comments from Alexei:
  * Do not skip writing to user space when log_true_size is zero.
  * Do not use 'bool' arguments.
  * Drop the adding WARN_ON_ONCE()'s.
* v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251002154841.99348-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

RFC v2 -> RFC v3:
* Rename probe_sys_bpf_extended to probe_sys_bpf_ext.
* Refactor reporting 'log_true_size' for prog_load.
* Refactor reporting 'btf_log_true_size' for btf_load.
* Add warnings for internal bugs in map_create.
* Check log_true_size in test cases.
* Address comment from Alexei:
  * Change kvzalloc/kvfree to kzalloc/kfree.
* Address comments from Andrii:
  * Move BPF_COMMON_ATTRS to 'enum bpf_cmd' alongside brief comment.
  * Add bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero() for extra checks.
  * Rename sys_bpf_extended to sys_bpf_ext.
  * Rename sys_bpf_fd_extended to sys_bpf_ext_fd.
  * Probe the new feature using NULL and -EFAULT.
  * Move probe_sys_bpf_ext to libbpf_internal.h and drop LIBBPF_API.
  * Return -EUSERS when log attrs are conflict between bpf_attr and
    bpf_common_attr.
  * Avoid touching bpf_vlog_init().
  * Update the reason messages in map_create.
  * Finalize the log using __cleanup().
  * Report log size to users.
  * Change type of log_buf from '__u64' to 'const char *' and cast type
    using ptr_to_u64() in bpf_map_create().
  * Do not return -EOPNOTSUPP when kernel doesn't support this feature
    in bpf_map_create().
  * Add log_level support for map creation for consistency.
* Address comment from Eduard:
  * Use common_attrs->log_level instead of BPF_LOG_FIXED.
* v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250911163328.93490-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

RFC v1 -> RFC v2:
* Fix build error reported by test bot.
* Address comments from Alexei:
  * Drop new uapi for freplace.
  * Add common attributes support for prog_load and btf_load.
  * Add common attributes support for map_create.
* v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250728142346.95681-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

Leon Hwang (9):
  bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support
  libbpf: Add support for extended bpf syscall
  bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load
  bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for prog_load
  bpf: Refactor reporting btf_log_true_size for btf_load
  bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for btf_load
  bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create
  libbpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create
  selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify map create failure log

 include/linux/bpf.h                           |   4 +-
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h                  |  17 ++
 include/linux/btf.h                           |   3 +-
 include/linux/syscalls.h                      |   3 +-
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |   8 +
 kernel/bpf/btf.c                              |  26 +--
 kernel/bpf/log.c                              | 101 +++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          | 107 ++++++++---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         |  13 +-
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |   8 +
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c                           |  52 +++++-
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h                           |  17 +-
 tools/lib/bpf/features.c                      |   8 +
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h               |   3 +
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_init.c       | 168 ++++++++++++++++++
 15 files changed, 483 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

--
2.52.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/9] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support
  2026-02-02 14:40 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-02 14:40 ` Leon Hwang
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/9] libbpf: Add support for extended bpf syscall Leon Hwang
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-02 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Leon Hwang, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing,
	Tao Chen, Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Anton Protopopov, Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api,
	linux-kselftest, kernel-patches-bot

Extend the BPF syscall to support a set of common attributes shared
across all BPF commands:

1. 'log_buf': User-provided buffer for storing logs.
2. 'log_size': Size of the log buffer.
3. 'log_level': Log verbosity level.
4. 'log_true_size': The size of log reported by kernel.

These common attributes are passed as the 4th argument to the BPF
syscall, with the 5th argument specifying the size of this structure.

To indicate the use of these common attributes from userspace, a new flag
'BPF_COMMON_ATTRS' ('1 << 16') is introduced. This flag is OR-ed into the
'cmd' field of the syscall.

When 'cmd & BPF_COMMON_ATTRS' is set, the kernel will copy the common
attributes from userspace into kernel space for use.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/syscalls.h       |  3 ++-
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  8 ++++++++
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c           | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  8 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/syscalls.h b/include/linux/syscalls.h
index cf84d98964b2..729659202d77 100644
--- a/include/linux/syscalls.h
+++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h
@@ -937,7 +937,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags,
 asmlinkage long sys_getrandom(char __user *buf, size_t count,
 			      unsigned int flags);
 asmlinkage long sys_memfd_create(const char __user *uname_ptr, unsigned int flags);
-asmlinkage long sys_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr __user *attr, unsigned int size);
+asmlinkage long sys_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr __user *attr, unsigned int size,
+			struct bpf_common_attr __user *attr_common, unsigned int size_common);
 asmlinkage long sys_execveat(int dfd, const char __user *filename,
 			const char __user *const __user *argv,
 			const char __user *const __user *envp, int flags);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index c8d400b7680a..b2126c9641ec 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -994,6 +994,7 @@ enum bpf_cmd {
 	BPF_PROG_STREAM_READ_BY_FD,
 	BPF_PROG_ASSOC_STRUCT_OPS,
 	__MAX_BPF_CMD,
+	BPF_COMMON_ATTRS = 1 << 16, /* Indicate carrying syscall common attrs. */
 };
 
 enum bpf_map_type {
@@ -1500,6 +1501,13 @@ struct bpf_stack_build_id {
 	};
 };
 
+struct bpf_common_attr {
+	__u64 log_buf;
+	__u32 log_size;
+	__u32 log_level;
+	__u32 log_true_size;
+};
+
 #define BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN 16U
 
 enum {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 5f59dd47a5b1..a58b16735e86 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -6176,8 +6176,10 @@ static int prog_assoc_struct_ops(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size)
+static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size,
+		     bpfptr_t uattr_common, unsigned int size_common)
 {
+	struct bpf_common_attr attr_common;
 	union bpf_attr attr;
 	int err;
 
@@ -6191,6 +6193,20 @@ static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size)
 	if (copy_from_bpfptr(&attr, uattr, size) != 0)
 		return -EFAULT;
 
+	memset(&attr_common, 0, sizeof(attr_common));
+	if (cmd & BPF_COMMON_ATTRS) {
+		err = bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(uattr_common, sizeof(attr_common), size_common);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+
+		cmd &= ~BPF_COMMON_ATTRS;
+		size_common = min_t(u32, size_common, sizeof(attr_common));
+		if (copy_from_bpfptr(&attr_common, uattr_common, size_common) != 0)
+			return -EFAULT;
+	} else {
+		size_common = 0;
+	}
+
 	err = security_bpf(cmd, &attr, size, uattr.is_kernel);
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
@@ -6326,9 +6342,10 @@ static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size)
 	return err;
 }
 
-SYSCALL_DEFINE3(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf_attr __user *, uattr, unsigned int, size)
+SYSCALL_DEFINE5(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf_attr __user *, uattr, unsigned int, size,
+		struct bpf_common_attr __user *, uattr_common, unsigned int, size_common)
 {
-	return __sys_bpf(cmd, USER_BPFPTR(uattr), size);
+	return __sys_bpf(cmd, USER_BPFPTR(uattr), size, USER_BPFPTR(uattr_common), size_common);
 }
 
 static bool syscall_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
@@ -6359,7 +6376,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_sys_bpf, int, cmd, union bpf_attr *, attr, u32, attr_size)
 	default:
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	return __sys_bpf(cmd, KERNEL_BPFPTR(attr), attr_size);
+	return __sys_bpf(cmd, KERNEL_BPFPTR(attr), attr_size, KERNEL_BPFPTR(NULL), 0);
 }
 
 
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 5e38b4887de6..c4934c2370fd 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -994,6 +994,7 @@ enum bpf_cmd {
 	BPF_PROG_STREAM_READ_BY_FD,
 	BPF_PROG_ASSOC_STRUCT_OPS,
 	__MAX_BPF_CMD,
+	BPF_COMMON_ATTRS = 1 << 16, /* Indicate carrying syscall common attrs. */
 };
 
 enum bpf_map_type {
@@ -1500,6 +1501,13 @@ struct bpf_stack_build_id {
 	};
 };
 
+struct bpf_common_attr {
+	__u64 log_buf;
+	__u32 log_size;
+	__u32 log_level;
+	__u32 log_true_size;
+};
+
 #define BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN 16U
 
 enum {
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/9] libbpf: Add support for extended bpf syscall
  2026-02-02 14:40 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/9] " Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-02 14:40 ` Leon Hwang
  2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/9] bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load Leon Hwang
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-02 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Leon Hwang, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing,
	Tao Chen, Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Anton Protopopov, Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api,
	linux-kselftest, kernel-patches-bot

To support the extended BPF syscall introduced in the previous commit,
introduce the following internal APIs:

* 'sys_bpf_ext()'
* 'sys_bpf_ext_fd()'
  They wrap the raw 'syscall()' interface to support passing extended
  attributes.
* 'probe_sys_bpf_ext()'
  Check whether current kernel supports the BPF syscall common attributes.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c             | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/features.c        |  8 ++++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
index 5846de364209..9d8740761b7a 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
@@ -69,6 +69,42 @@ static inline __u64 ptr_to_u64(const void *ptr)
 	return (__u64) (unsigned long) ptr;
 }
 
+static inline int sys_bpf_ext(enum bpf_cmd cmd, union bpf_attr *attr,
+			      unsigned int size,
+			      struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
+			      unsigned int size_common)
+{
+	cmd = attr_common ? (cmd | BPF_COMMON_ATTRS) : (cmd & ~BPF_COMMON_ATTRS);
+	return syscall(__NR_bpf, cmd, attr, size, attr_common, size_common);
+}
+
+static inline int sys_bpf_ext_fd(enum bpf_cmd cmd, union bpf_attr *attr,
+				 unsigned int size,
+				 struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
+				 unsigned int size_common)
+{
+	int fd;
+
+	fd = sys_bpf_ext(cmd, attr, size, attr_common, size_common);
+	return ensure_good_fd(fd);
+}
+
+int probe_sys_bpf_ext(void)
+{
+	const size_t attr_sz = offsetofend(union bpf_attr, prog_token_fd);
+	union bpf_attr attr;
+	int fd;
+
+	memset(&attr, 0, attr_sz);
+	fd = syscall(__NR_bpf, BPF_PROG_LOAD | BPF_COMMON_ATTRS, &attr, attr_sz, NULL,
+		     sizeof(struct bpf_common_attr));
+	if (fd >= 0) {
+		close(fd);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	return errno == EFAULT ? 1 : 0;
+}
+
 static inline int sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, union bpf_attr *attr,
 			  unsigned int size)
 {
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/features.c b/tools/lib/bpf/features.c
index b842b83e2480..e0d646a9e233 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/features.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/features.c
@@ -506,6 +506,11 @@ static int probe_kern_arg_ctx_tag(int token_fd)
 	return probe_fd(prog_fd);
 }
 
+static int probe_bpf_syscall_common_attrs(int token_fd)
+{
+	return probe_sys_bpf_ext();
+}
+
 typedef int (*feature_probe_fn)(int /* token_fd */);
 
 static struct kern_feature_cache feature_cache;
@@ -581,6 +586,9 @@ static struct kern_feature_desc {
 	[FEAT_BTF_QMARK_DATASEC] = {
 		"BTF DATASEC names starting from '?'", probe_kern_btf_qmark_datasec,
 	},
+	[FEAT_BPF_SYSCALL_COMMON_ATTRS] = {
+		"BPF syscall common attributes support", probe_bpf_syscall_common_attrs,
+	},
 };
 
 bool feat_supported(struct kern_feature_cache *cache, enum kern_feature_id feat_id)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
index fc59b21b51b5..aa16be869c4f 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
@@ -392,6 +392,8 @@ enum kern_feature_id {
 	FEAT_ARG_CTX_TAG,
 	/* Kernel supports '?' at the front of datasec names */
 	FEAT_BTF_QMARK_DATASEC,
+	/* Kernel supports BPF syscall common attributes */
+	FEAT_BPF_SYSCALL_COMMON_ATTRS,
 	__FEAT_CNT,
 };
 
@@ -757,4 +759,5 @@ int probe_fd(int fd);
 #define SHA256_DWORD_SIZE SHA256_DIGEST_LENGTH / sizeof(__u64)
 
 void libbpf_sha256(const void *data, size_t len, __u8 out[SHA256_DIGEST_LENGTH]);
+int probe_sys_bpf_ext(void);
 #endif /* __LIBBPF_LIBBPF_INTERNAL_H */
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/9] bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load
  2026-02-02 14:40 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/9] " Leon Hwang
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/9] libbpf: Add support for extended bpf syscall Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-02 14:40 ` Leon Hwang
  2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support " Leon Hwang
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-02 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Leon Hwang, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing,
	Tao Chen, Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Anton Protopopov, Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api,
	linux-kselftest, kernel-patches-bot

The next commit will add support for reporting logs via extended common
attributes, including 'log_true_size'.

To prepare for that, refactor the 'log_true_size' reporting logic by
introducing a new struct bpf_log_attr to encapsulate log-related behavior:

 * bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(): initialize the log fields, which will
   support extended common attributes in the next commit.
 * bpf_log_attr_finalize(): handle log finalization and write back
   'log_true_size' to userspace.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h          |  4 +++-
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 10 ++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/log.c             | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c         |  8 +++++---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 13 +++----------
 5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index cd9b96434904..d4dbcc7ad156 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2913,7 +2913,9 @@ int bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(bpfptr_t uaddr, size_t expected_size,
 			     size_t actual_size);
 
 /* verify correctness of eBPF program */
-int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **fp, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size);
+struct bpf_log_attr;
+int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **fp, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr,
+	      struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log);
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
 void bpf_patch_call_args(struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 stack_depth);
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 8355b585cd18..c805b85b6f7a 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -631,6 +631,16 @@ static inline bool bpf_verifier_log_needed(const struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
 	return log && log->level;
 }
 
+struct bpf_log_attr {
+	u32 offsetof_true_size;
+	u32 uattr_size;
+	bpfptr_t uattr;
+};
+
+int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
+				bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size);
+int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
+
 #define BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS 256
 
 struct bpf_subprog_arg_info {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
index a0c3b35de2ce..ff579fcba36f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
@@ -863,3 +863,38 @@ void print_insn_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_verifier_st
 	}
 	print_verifier_state(env, vstate, frameno, false);
 }
+
+static void bpf_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, int offsetof_true_size, bpfptr_t uattr,
+			      u32 uattr_size)
+{
+	memset(attr_log, 0, sizeof(*attr_log));
+	attr_log->offsetof_true_size = offsetof_true_size;
+	attr_log->uattr_size = uattr_size;
+	attr_log->uattr = uattr;
+}
+
+int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
+				bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size)
+{
+	bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size), uattr, size);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
+{
+	u32 log_true_size;
+	size_t size;
+	int err;
+
+	if (!log)
+		return 0;
+
+	err = bpf_vlog_finalize(log, &log_true_size);
+
+	size = sizeof(log_true_size);
+	if (attr->uattr_size >= attr->offsetof_true_size + size &&
+	    copy_to_bpfptr_offset(attr->uattr, attr->offsetof_true_size, &log_true_size, size))
+		err = -EFAULT;
+
+	return err;
+}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index a58b16735e86..e81199361241 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2860,7 +2860,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_mark_insn_arrays_ready(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 /* last field in 'union bpf_attr' used by this command */
 #define BPF_PROG_LOAD_LAST_FIELD keyring_id
 
-static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
+static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log)
 {
 	enum bpf_prog_type type = attr->prog_type;
 	struct bpf_prog *prog, *dst_prog = NULL;
@@ -3078,7 +3078,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
 		goto free_prog_sec;
 
 	/* run eBPF verifier */
-	err = bpf_check(&prog, attr, uattr, uattr_size);
+	err = bpf_check(&prog, attr, uattr, attr_log);
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto free_used_maps;
 
@@ -6180,6 +6180,7 @@ static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size,
 		     bpfptr_t uattr_common, unsigned int size_common)
 {
 	struct bpf_common_attr attr_common;
+	struct bpf_log_attr attr_log;
 	union bpf_attr attr;
 	int err;
 
@@ -6231,7 +6232,8 @@ static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size,
 		err = map_freeze(&attr);
 		break;
 	case BPF_PROG_LOAD:
-		err = bpf_prog_load(&attr, uattr, size);
+		err = bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(&attr_log, &attr, uattr, size);
+		err = err ?: bpf_prog_load(&attr, uattr, &attr_log);
 		break;
 	case BPF_OBJ_PIN:
 		err = bpf_obj_pin(&attr);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 6b62b6d57175..1489867671e0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -25604,12 +25604,12 @@ static int compute_scc(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	return err;
 }
 
-int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, __u32 uattr_size)
+int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr,
+	      struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log)
 {
 	u64 start_time = ktime_get_ns();
 	struct bpf_verifier_env *env;
 	int i, len, ret = -EINVAL, err;
-	u32 log_true_size;
 	bool is_priv;
 
 	BTF_TYPE_EMIT(enum bpf_features);
@@ -25808,17 +25808,10 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, __u3
 	env->prog->aux->verified_insns = env->insn_processed;
 
 	/* preserve original error even if log finalization is successful */
-	err = bpf_vlog_finalize(&env->log, &log_true_size);
+	err = bpf_log_attr_finalize(attr_log, &env->log);
 	if (err)
 		ret = err;
 
-	if (uattr_size >= offsetofend(union bpf_attr, log_true_size) &&
-	    copy_to_bpfptr_offset(uattr, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size),
-				  &log_true_size, sizeof(log_true_size))) {
-		ret = -EFAULT;
-		goto err_release_maps;
-	}
-
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_release_maps;
 
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for prog_load
  2026-02-02 14:40 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/9] bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-02 14:40 ` Leon Hwang
  2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/9] bpf: Refactor reporting btf_log_true_size for btf_load Leon Hwang
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-02 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Leon Hwang, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing,
	Tao Chen, Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Anton Protopopov, Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api,
	linux-kselftest, kernel-patches-bot

BPF_PROG_LOAD can now provide log parameters through both union bpf_attr
and struct bpf_common_attr. Define clear conflict and precedence rules:

- if both are provided and log_buf/log_size/log_level match, use them;
- if only one side provides a log buffer, use that one;
- if both provide log buffers but differ, return -EINVAL.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  3 ++-
 kernel/bpf/log.c             | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c         |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index c805b85b6f7a..0d106fddbbc5 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -638,7 +638,8 @@ struct bpf_log_attr {
 };
 
 int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
-				bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size);
+				bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
+				bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common);
 int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
 
 #define BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS 256
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
index ff579fcba36f..345005ba98dd 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
@@ -873,10 +873,30 @@ static void bpf_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, int offsetof_true_s
 	attr_log->uattr = uattr;
 }
 
+static bool bpf_log_attrs_diff(struct bpf_common_attr *common, u64 log_buf, u32 log_size,
+			       u32 log_level)
+{
+	return log_buf && common->log_buf && (log_buf != common->log_buf ||
+					      log_size != common->log_size ||
+					      log_level != common->log_level);
+}
+
 int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
-				bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size)
+				bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
+				bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common)
 {
-	bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size), uattr, size);
+	if (bpf_log_attrs_diff(attr_common, attr->log_buf, attr->log_size, attr->log_level))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!attr->log_buf && attr_common->log_buf) {
+		attr->log_buf = attr_common->log_buf;
+		attr->log_size = attr_common->log_size;
+		attr->log_level = attr_common->log_level;
+		bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(struct bpf_common_attr, log_true_size),
+				  uattr_common, size_common);
+	} else {
+		bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size), uattr, size);
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index e81199361241..7125ea445c6c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -6232,7 +6232,8 @@ static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size,
 		err = map_freeze(&attr);
 		break;
 	case BPF_PROG_LOAD:
-		err = bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(&attr_log, &attr, uattr, size);
+		err = bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(&attr_log, &attr, uattr, size, &attr_common,
+						  uattr_common, size_common);
 		err = err ?: bpf_prog_load(&attr, uattr, &attr_log);
 		break;
 	case BPF_OBJ_PIN:
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/9] bpf: Refactor reporting btf_log_true_size for btf_load
  2026-02-02 14:40 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support " Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-02 14:40 ` Leon Hwang
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support " Leon Hwang
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-02 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Leon Hwang, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing,
	Tao Chen, Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Anton Protopopov, Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api,
	linux-kselftest, kernel-patches-bot

In the next commit, it will be able to report logs via extended common
attributes, which will report 'log_true_size' via the extended common
attributes meanwhile.

Therefore, refactor the way of 'btf_log_true_size' reporting in order to
report 'log_true_size' via the extended common attributes easily.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  2 ++
 include/linux/btf.h          |  3 ++-
 kernel/bpf/btf.c             | 26 ++++++--------------------
 kernel/bpf/log.c             |  7 +++++++
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c         |  7 ++++---
 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 0d106fddbbc5..b6e33ee82f63 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -640,6 +640,8 @@ struct bpf_log_attr {
 int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
 				bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
 				bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common);
+int bpf_btf_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
+			       bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size);
 int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
 
 #define BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS 256
diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
index 48108471c5b1..f64d87315c5f 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf.h
@@ -145,7 +145,8 @@ const char *btf_get_name(const struct btf *btf);
 void btf_get(struct btf *btf);
 void btf_put(struct btf *btf);
 const struct btf_header *btf_header(const struct btf *btf);
-int btf_new_fd(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_sz);
+struct bpf_log_attr;
+int btf_new_fd(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log);
 struct btf *btf_get_by_fd(int fd);
 int btf_get_info_by_fd(const struct btf *btf,
 		       const union bpf_attr *attr,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 8959f3bc1e92..753db6408c71 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -5856,22 +5856,8 @@ static int btf_check_type_tags(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int finalize_log(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
-{
-	u32 log_true_size;
-	int err;
-
-	err = bpf_vlog_finalize(log, &log_true_size);
-
-	if (uattr_size >= offsetofend(union bpf_attr, btf_log_true_size) &&
-	    copy_to_bpfptr_offset(uattr, offsetof(union bpf_attr, btf_log_true_size),
-				  &log_true_size, sizeof(log_true_size)))
-		err = -EFAULT;
-
-	return err;
-}
-
-static struct btf *btf_parse(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
+static struct btf *btf_parse(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr,
+			     struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log)
 {
 	bpfptr_t btf_data = make_bpfptr(attr->btf, uattr.is_kernel);
 	char __user *log_ubuf = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->btf_log_buf);
@@ -5953,7 +5939,7 @@ static struct btf *btf_parse(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uat
 		}
 	}
 
-	err = finalize_log(&env->log, uattr, uattr_size);
+	err = bpf_log_attr_finalize(attr_log, &env->log);
 	if (err)
 		goto errout_free;
 
@@ -5965,7 +5951,7 @@ static struct btf *btf_parse(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uat
 	btf_free_struct_meta_tab(btf);
 errout:
 	/* overwrite err with -ENOSPC or -EFAULT */
-	ret = finalize_log(&env->log, uattr, uattr_size);
+	ret = bpf_log_attr_finalize(attr_log, &env->log);
 	if (ret)
 		err = ret;
 errout_free:
@@ -8136,12 +8122,12 @@ static int __btf_new_fd(struct btf *btf)
 	return anon_inode_getfd("btf", &btf_fops, btf, O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
 }
 
-int btf_new_fd(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
+int btf_new_fd(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log)
 {
 	struct btf *btf;
 	int ret;
 
-	btf = btf_parse(attr, uattr, uattr_size);
+	btf = btf_parse(attr, uattr, attr_log);
 	if (IS_ERR(btf))
 		return PTR_ERR(btf);
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
index 345005ba98dd..8ad88e4aa12c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
@@ -900,6 +900,13 @@ int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *a
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int bpf_btf_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
+			       bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size)
+{
+	bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, btf_log_true_size), uattr, size);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
 {
 	u32 log_true_size;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 7125ea445c6c..b6e4ec641dc1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -5438,7 +5438,7 @@ static int bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(const union bpf_attr *attr,
 
 #define BPF_BTF_LOAD_LAST_FIELD btf_token_fd
 
-static int bpf_btf_load(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, __u32 uattr_size)
+static int bpf_btf_load(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log)
 {
 	struct bpf_token *token = NULL;
 
@@ -5465,7 +5465,7 @@ static int bpf_btf_load(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, __u32 uattr_
 
 	bpf_token_put(token);
 
-	return btf_new_fd(attr, uattr, uattr_size);
+	return btf_new_fd(attr, uattr, attr_log);
 }
 
 #define BPF_BTF_GET_FD_BY_ID_LAST_FIELD fd_by_id_token_fd
@@ -6279,7 +6279,8 @@ static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size,
 		err = bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(&attr);
 		break;
 	case BPF_BTF_LOAD:
-		err = bpf_btf_load(&attr, uattr, size);
+		err = bpf_btf_load_log_attr_init(&attr_log, &attr, uattr, size);
+		err = err ?: bpf_btf_load(&attr, uattr, &attr_log);
 		break;
 	case BPF_BTF_GET_FD_BY_ID:
 		err = bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id(&attr);
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for btf_load
  2026-02-02 14:40 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/9] bpf: Refactor reporting btf_log_true_size for btf_load Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-02 14:40 ` Leon Hwang
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create Leon Hwang
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-02 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Leon Hwang, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing,
	Tao Chen, Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Anton Protopopov, Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api,
	linux-kselftest, kernel-patches-bot

BPF_BTF_LOAD can now provide log parameters through both union bpf_attr
and bpf_common_attr. Apply the same conflict and precedence rules as
prog_load:

- if both are provided and btf_log_buf/btf_log_size/btf_log_level match,
  use them;
- if only one side provides a log buffer, use that one;
- if both provide log buffers but differ, return -EINVAL.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  3 ++-
 kernel/bpf/log.c             | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c         |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index b6e33ee82f63..1144657bbc2f 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -641,7 +641,8 @@ int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *a
 				bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
 				bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common);
 int bpf_btf_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
-			       bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size);
+			       bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
+			       bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common);
 int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
 
 #define BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS 256
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
index 8ad88e4aa12c..db2716586f85 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
@@ -901,9 +901,23 @@ int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *a
 }
 
 int bpf_btf_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
-			       bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size)
+			       bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
+			       bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common)
 {
-	bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, btf_log_true_size), uattr, size);
+	if (bpf_log_attrs_diff(attr_common, attr->btf_log_buf, attr->btf_log_size,
+			       attr->btf_log_level))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!attr->btf_log_buf && attr_common->log_buf) {
+		attr->btf_log_buf = attr_common->log_buf;
+		attr->btf_log_size = attr_common->log_size;
+		attr->btf_log_level = attr_common->log_level;
+		bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(struct bpf_common_attr, log_true_size),
+				  uattr_common, size_common);
+	} else {
+		bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, btf_log_true_size), uattr,
+				  size);
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index b6e4ec641dc1..4a8933c1dd38 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -6279,7 +6279,8 @@ static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size,
 		err = bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(&attr);
 		break;
 	case BPF_BTF_LOAD:
-		err = bpf_btf_load_log_attr_init(&attr_log, &attr, uattr, size);
+		err = bpf_btf_load_log_attr_init(&attr_log, &attr, uattr, size, &attr_common,
+						 uattr_common, size_common);
 		err = err ?: bpf_btf_load(&attr, uattr, &attr_log);
 		break;
 	case BPF_BTF_GET_FD_BY_ID:
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create
  2026-02-02 14:40 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support " Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-02 14:40 ` Leon Hwang
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 8/9] libbpf: " Leon Hwang
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify map create failure log Leon Hwang
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-02 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Leon Hwang, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing,
	Tao Chen, Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Anton Protopopov, Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api,
	linux-kselftest, kernel-patches-bot

Many BPF_MAP_CREATE validation failures currently return -EINVAL without
any explanation to userspace.

Plumb common syscall log attributes into map_create(), create a verifier
log from bpf_common_attr::log_buf/log_size/log_level, and report
map-creation failure reasons through that buffer.

This improves debuggability by allowing userspace to inspect why map
creation failed and read back log_true_size from common attributes.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  3 ++
 kernel/bpf/log.c             | 25 ++++++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c         | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 1144657bbc2f..eb7e6e0458f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -643,6 +643,9 @@ int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *a
 int bpf_btf_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
 			       bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
 			       bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common);
+struct bpf_verifier_log *bpf_log_attr_create_vlog(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log,
+						  struct bpf_common_attr *common, bpfptr_t uattr,
+						  u32 size);
 int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
 
 #define BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS 256
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
index db2716586f85..e5a46ad4eb23 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
@@ -921,6 +921,31 @@ int bpf_btf_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *at
 	return 0;
 }
 
+struct bpf_verifier_log *bpf_log_attr_create_vlog(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log,
+						  struct bpf_common_attr *common, bpfptr_t uattr,
+						  u32 size)
+{
+	struct bpf_verifier_log *log;
+	int err;
+
+	if (!common->log_buf)
+		return NULL;
+
+	log = kzalloc(sizeof(*log), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!log)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+	err = bpf_vlog_init(log, common->log_level, u64_to_user_ptr(common->log_buf),
+			    common->log_size);
+	if (err) {
+		kfree(log);
+		return ERR_PTR(err);
+	}
+
+	bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(struct bpf_common_attr, log_true_size), uattr, size);
+	return log;
+}
+
 int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
 {
 	u32 log_true_size;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 4a8933c1dd38..d26f63bd460e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ static int map_check_btf(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_token *token,
 
 #define BPF_MAP_CREATE_LAST_FIELD excl_prog_hash_size
 /* called via syscall */
-static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
+static int __map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
 {
 	const struct bpf_map_ops *ops;
 	struct bpf_token *token = NULL;
@@ -1377,8 +1377,10 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 	int err;
 
 	err = CHECK_ATTR(BPF_MAP_CREATE);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		bpf_log(log, "Invalid attr.\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	/* check BPF_F_TOKEN_FD flag, remember if it's set, and then clear it
 	 * to avoid per-map type checks tripping on unknown flag
@@ -1387,17 +1389,25 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 	attr->map_flags &= ~BPF_F_TOKEN_FD;
 
 	if (attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id) {
-		if (attr->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS ||
-		    attr->btf_key_type_id || attr->btf_value_type_id)
+		if (attr->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS) {
+			bpf_log(log, "btf_vmlinux_value_type_id can only be used with struct_ops maps.\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		if (attr->btf_key_type_id || attr->btf_value_type_id) {
+			bpf_log(log, "btf_vmlinux_value_type_id is mutually exclusive with btf_key_type_id and btf_value_type_id.\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 	} else if (attr->btf_key_type_id && !attr->btf_value_type_id) {
+		bpf_log(log, "Invalid btf_value_type_id.\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	if (attr->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_BLOOM_FILTER &&
 	    attr->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARENA &&
-	    attr->map_extra != 0)
+	    attr->map_extra != 0) {
+		bpf_log(log, "Invalid map_extra.\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	f_flags = bpf_get_file_flag(attr->map_flags);
 	if (f_flags < 0)
@@ -1405,13 +1415,17 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 
 	if (numa_node != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
 	    ((unsigned int)numa_node >= nr_node_ids ||
-	     !node_online(numa_node)))
+	     !node_online(numa_node))) {
+		bpf_log(log, "Invalid numa_node.\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	/* find map type and init map: hashtable vs rbtree vs bloom vs ... */
 	map_type = attr->map_type;
-	if (map_type >= ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_map_types))
+	if (map_type >= ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_map_types)) {
+		bpf_log(log, "Invalid map_type.\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 	map_type = array_index_nospec(map_type, ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_map_types));
 	ops = bpf_map_types[map_type];
 	if (!ops)
@@ -1429,8 +1443,10 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 
 	if (token_flag) {
 		token = bpf_token_get_from_fd(attr->map_token_fd);
-		if (IS_ERR(token))
+		if (IS_ERR(token)) {
+			bpf_log(log, "Invalid map_token_fd.\n");
 			return PTR_ERR(token);
+		}
 
 		/* if current token doesn't grant map creation permissions,
 		 * then we can't use this token, so ignore it and rely on
@@ -1513,8 +1529,10 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 
 	err = bpf_obj_name_cpy(map->name, attr->map_name,
 			       sizeof(attr->map_name));
-	if (err < 0)
+	if (err < 0) {
+		bpf_log(log, "Invalid map_name.\n");
 		goto free_map;
+	}
 
 	preempt_disable();
 	map->cookie = gen_cookie_next(&bpf_map_cookie);
@@ -1537,6 +1555,7 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 
 		btf = btf_get_by_fd(attr->btf_fd);
 		if (IS_ERR(btf)) {
+			bpf_log(log, "Invalid btf_fd.\n");
 			err = PTR_ERR(btf);
 			goto free_map;
 		}
@@ -1564,6 +1583,7 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 		bpfptr_t uprog_hash = make_bpfptr(attr->excl_prog_hash, uattr.is_kernel);
 
 		if (attr->excl_prog_hash_size != SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE) {
+			bpf_log(log, "Invalid excl_prog_hash_size.\n");
 			err = -EINVAL;
 			goto free_map;
 		}
@@ -1579,6 +1599,7 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 			goto free_map;
 		}
 	} else if (attr->excl_prog_hash_size) {
+		bpf_log(log, "Invalid excl_prog_hash_size.\n");
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto free_map;
 	}
@@ -1617,6 +1638,30 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
+		      bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common)
+{
+	struct bpf_verifier_log *log;
+	struct bpf_log_attr attr_log;
+	int err, ret;
+
+	log = bpf_log_attr_create_vlog(&attr_log, attr_common, uattr_common, size_common);
+	if (IS_ERR(log))
+		return PTR_ERR(log);
+
+	err = __map_create(attr, uattr, log);
+	if (err >= 0)
+		goto free;
+
+	ret = bpf_log_attr_finalize(&attr_log, log);
+	if (ret)
+		err = ret;
+
+free:
+	kfree(log);
+	return err;
+}
+
 void bpf_map_inc(struct bpf_map *map)
 {
 	atomic64_inc(&map->refcnt);
@@ -6214,7 +6259,7 @@ static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size,
 
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case BPF_MAP_CREATE:
-		err = map_create(&attr, uattr);
+		err = map_create(&attr, uattr, &attr_common, uattr_common, size_common);
 		break;
 	case BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM:
 		err = map_lookup_elem(&attr);
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 8/9] libbpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create
  2026-02-02 14:40 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-02 14:40 ` Leon Hwang
  2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify map create failure log Leon Hwang
  8 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-02 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Leon Hwang, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing,
	Tao Chen, Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Anton Protopopov, Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api,
	linux-kselftest, kernel-patches-bot

With the previous commit adding common attribute support for
BPF_MAP_CREATE, users can now retrieve detailed error messages when map
creation fails via the log_buf field.

Introduce struct bpf_log_opts with the following fields:
log_buf, log_size, log_level, and log_true_size.

Extend bpf_map_create_opts with a new field log_opts, allowing users to
capture and inspect log messages on map creation failures.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
index 9d8740761b7a..0c3e40844d80 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
@@ -209,6 +209,9 @@ int bpf_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type,
 		   const struct bpf_map_create_opts *opts)
 {
 	const size_t attr_sz = offsetofend(union bpf_attr, excl_prog_hash_size);
+	const size_t attr_common_sz = sizeof(struct bpf_common_attr);
+	struct bpf_common_attr attr_common;
+	struct bpf_log_opts *log_opts;
 	union bpf_attr attr;
 	int fd;
 
@@ -242,7 +245,18 @@ int bpf_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type,
 	attr.excl_prog_hash = ptr_to_u64(OPTS_GET(opts, excl_prog_hash, NULL));
 	attr.excl_prog_hash_size = OPTS_GET(opts, excl_prog_hash_size, 0);
 
-	fd = sys_bpf_fd(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, attr_sz);
+	log_opts = OPTS_GET(opts, log_opts, NULL);
+	if (log_opts && feat_supported(NULL, FEAT_BPF_SYSCALL_COMMON_ATTRS)) {
+		memset(&attr_common, 0, attr_common_sz);
+		attr_common.log_buf = ptr_to_u64(OPTS_GET(log_opts, log_buf, NULL));
+		attr_common.log_size = OPTS_GET(log_opts, log_size, 0);
+		attr_common.log_level = OPTS_GET(log_opts, log_level, 0);
+		fd = sys_bpf_ext_fd(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, attr_sz, &attr_common, attr_common_sz);
+		OPTS_SET(log_opts, log_true_size, attr_common.log_true_size);
+	} else {
+		fd = sys_bpf_fd(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, attr_sz);
+		OPTS_SET(log_opts, log_true_size, 0);
+	}
 	return libbpf_err_errno(fd);
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
index 2c8e88ddb674..59673f094f86 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
@@ -37,6 +37,18 @@ extern "C" {
 
 LIBBPF_API int libbpf_set_memlock_rlim(size_t memlock_bytes);
 
+struct bpf_log_opts {
+	size_t sz; /* size of this struct for forward/backward compatibility */
+
+	char *log_buf;
+	__u32 log_size;
+	__u32 log_level;
+	__u32 log_true_size;
+
+	size_t :0;
+};
+#define bpf_log_opts__last_field log_true_size
+
 struct bpf_map_create_opts {
 	size_t sz; /* size of this struct for forward/backward compatibility */
 
@@ -57,9 +69,12 @@ struct bpf_map_create_opts {
 
 	const void *excl_prog_hash;
 	__u32 excl_prog_hash_size;
+
+	struct bpf_log_opts *log_opts;
+
 	size_t :0;
 };
-#define bpf_map_create_opts__last_field excl_prog_hash_size
+#define bpf_map_create_opts__last_field log_opts
 
 LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type,
 			      const char *map_name,
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify map create failure log
  2026-02-02 14:40 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 8/9] libbpf: " Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-02 14:40 ` Leon Hwang
  2026-02-04 20:14   ` Alexei Starovoitov
  8 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-02 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Leon Hwang, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing,
	Tao Chen, Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Anton Protopopov, Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api,
	linux-kselftest, kernel-patches-bot

Add tests to verify that the kernel reports the expected error messages
when map creation fails.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_init.c       | 168 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 168 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_init.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_init.c
index 14a31109dd0e..89e6daf2fcfd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_init.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_init.c
@@ -212,3 +212,171 @@ void test_map_init(void)
 	if (test__start_subtest("pcpu_lru_map_init"))
 		test_pcpu_lru_map_init();
 }
+
+#define BPF_LOG_FIXED	8
+
+static void test_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type, const char *map_name,
+			    struct bpf_map_create_opts *opts, const char *exp_msg)
+{
+	const int key_size = 4, value_size = 4, max_entries = 1;
+	char log_buf[128];
+	int fd;
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_log_opts, log_opts);
+
+	log_buf[0] = '\0';
+	log_opts.log_buf = log_buf;
+	log_opts.log_size = sizeof(log_buf);
+	log_opts.log_level = BPF_LOG_FIXED;
+	opts->log_opts = &log_opts;
+	fd = bpf_map_create(map_type, map_name, key_size, value_size, max_entries, opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_LT(fd, 0, "bpf_map_create")) {
+		close(fd);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	ASSERT_STREQ(log_buf, exp_msg, "log_buf");
+	ASSERT_EQ(log_opts.log_true_size, strlen(exp_msg) + 1, "log_true_size");
+}
+
+static void test_map_create_array(struct bpf_map_create_opts *opts, const char *exp_msg)
+{
+	test_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, "test_map_create", opts, exp_msg);
+}
+
+static void test_invalid_vmlinux_value_type_id_struct_ops(void)
+{
+	const char *msg = "btf_vmlinux_value_type_id can only be used with struct_ops maps.\n";
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts,
+		    .btf_vmlinux_value_type_id = 1,
+	);
+
+	test_map_create_array(&opts, msg);
+}
+
+static void test_invalid_vmlinux_value_type_id_kv_type_id(void)
+{
+	const char *msg = "btf_vmlinux_value_type_id is mutually exclusive with btf_key_type_id and btf_value_type_id.\n";
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts,
+		    .btf_vmlinux_value_type_id = 1,
+		    .btf_key_type_id = 1,
+	);
+
+	test_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS, "test_map_create", &opts, msg);
+}
+
+static void test_invalid_value_type_id(void)
+{
+	const char *msg = "Invalid btf_value_type_id.\n";
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts,
+		    .btf_key_type_id = 1,
+	);
+
+	test_map_create_array(&opts, msg);
+}
+
+static void test_invalid_map_extra(void)
+{
+	const char *msg = "Invalid map_extra.\n";
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts,
+		    .map_extra = 1,
+	);
+
+	test_map_create_array(&opts, msg);
+}
+
+static void test_invalid_numa_node(void)
+{
+	const char *msg = "Invalid numa_node.\n";
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts,
+		    .map_flags = BPF_F_NUMA_NODE,
+		    .numa_node = 0xFF,
+	);
+
+	test_map_create_array(&opts, msg);
+}
+
+static void test_invalid_map_type(void)
+{
+	const char *msg = "Invalid map_type.\n";
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts);
+
+	test_map_create(__MAX_BPF_MAP_TYPE, "test_map_create", &opts, msg);
+}
+
+static void test_invalid_token_fd(void)
+{
+	const char *msg = "Invalid map_token_fd.\n";
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts,
+		    .map_flags = BPF_F_TOKEN_FD,
+		    .token_fd = 0xFF,
+	);
+
+	test_map_create_array(&opts, msg);
+}
+
+static void test_invalid_map_name(void)
+{
+	const char *msg = "Invalid map_name.\n";
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts);
+
+	test_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, "test-!@#", &opts, msg);
+}
+
+static void test_invalid_btf_fd(void)
+{
+	const char *msg = "Invalid btf_fd.\n";
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts,
+		    .btf_fd = -1,
+		    .btf_key_type_id = 1,
+		    .btf_value_type_id = 1,
+	);
+
+	test_map_create_array(&opts, msg);
+}
+
+static void test_excl_prog_hash_size_1(void)
+{
+	const char *msg = "Invalid excl_prog_hash_size.\n";
+	const char *hash = "DEADCODE";
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts,
+		    .excl_prog_hash = hash,
+	);
+
+	test_map_create_array(&opts, msg);
+}
+
+static void test_excl_prog_hash_size_2(void)
+{
+	const char *msg = "Invalid excl_prog_hash_size.\n";
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts,
+		    .excl_prog_hash_size = 1,
+	);
+
+	test_map_create_array(&opts, msg);
+}
+
+void test_map_create_failure(void)
+{
+	if (test__start_subtest("invalid_vmlinux_value_type_id_struct_ops"))
+		test_invalid_vmlinux_value_type_id_struct_ops();
+	if (test__start_subtest("invalid_vmlinux_value_type_id_kv_type_id"))
+		test_invalid_vmlinux_value_type_id_kv_type_id();
+	if (test__start_subtest("invalid_value_type_id"))
+		test_invalid_value_type_id();
+	if (test__start_subtest("invalid_map_extra"))
+		test_invalid_map_extra();
+	if (test__start_subtest("invalid_numa_node"))
+		test_invalid_numa_node();
+	if (test__start_subtest("invalid_map_type"))
+		test_invalid_map_type();
+	if (test__start_subtest("invalid_token_fd"))
+		test_invalid_token_fd();
+	if (test__start_subtest("invalid_map_name"))
+		test_invalid_map_name();
+	if (test__start_subtest("invalid_btf_fd"))
+		test_invalid_btf_fd();
+	if (test__start_subtest("invalid_excl_prog_hash_size_1"))
+		test_excl_prog_hash_size_1();
+	if (test__start_subtest("invalid_excl_prog_hash_size_2"))
+		test_excl_prog_hash_size_2();
+}
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 8/9] libbpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 8/9] libbpf: " Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2026-02-05  3:45     ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2026-02-04 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leon Hwang
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing, Tao Chen,
	Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Anton Protopopov,
	Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api, linux-kselftest,
	kernel-patches-bot

On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:43 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> With the previous commit adding common attribute support for
> BPF_MAP_CREATE, users can now retrieve detailed error messages when map
> creation fails via the log_buf field.
>
> Introduce struct bpf_log_opts with the following fields:
> log_buf, log_size, log_level, and log_true_size.
>
> Extend bpf_map_create_opts with a new field log_opts, allowing users to
> capture and inspect log messages on map creation failures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>

LGTM

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> index 9d8740761b7a..0c3e40844d80 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> @@ -209,6 +209,9 @@ int bpf_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type,
>                    const struct bpf_map_create_opts *opts)
>  {
>         const size_t attr_sz = offsetofend(union bpf_attr, excl_prog_hash_size);
> +       const size_t attr_common_sz = sizeof(struct bpf_common_attr);
> +       struct bpf_common_attr attr_common;
> +       struct bpf_log_opts *log_opts;
>         union bpf_attr attr;
>         int fd;
>
> @@ -242,7 +245,18 @@ int bpf_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type,
>         attr.excl_prog_hash = ptr_to_u64(OPTS_GET(opts, excl_prog_hash, NULL));
>         attr.excl_prog_hash_size = OPTS_GET(opts, excl_prog_hash_size, 0);
>
> -       fd = sys_bpf_fd(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, attr_sz);
> +       log_opts = OPTS_GET(opts, log_opts, NULL);
> +       if (log_opts && feat_supported(NULL, FEAT_BPF_SYSCALL_COMMON_ATTRS)) {
> +               memset(&attr_common, 0, attr_common_sz);
> +               attr_common.log_buf = ptr_to_u64(OPTS_GET(log_opts, log_buf, NULL));
> +               attr_common.log_size = OPTS_GET(log_opts, log_size, 0);
> +               attr_common.log_level = OPTS_GET(log_opts, log_level, 0);
> +               fd = sys_bpf_ext_fd(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, attr_sz, &attr_common, attr_common_sz);
> +               OPTS_SET(log_opts, log_true_size, attr_common.log_true_size);
> +       } else {
> +               fd = sys_bpf_fd(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, attr_sz);
> +               OPTS_SET(log_opts, log_true_size, 0);
> +       }
>         return libbpf_err_errno(fd);
>  }
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> index 2c8e88ddb674..59673f094f86 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,18 @@ extern "C" {
>
>  LIBBPF_API int libbpf_set_memlock_rlim(size_t memlock_bytes);
>
> +struct bpf_log_opts {
> +       size_t sz; /* size of this struct for forward/backward compatibility */
> +
> +       char *log_buf;
> +       __u32 log_size;
> +       __u32 log_level;
> +       __u32 log_true_size;

please mention in the comment here that this is an out parameter set
by the kernel

> +
> +       size_t :0;
> +};
> +#define bpf_log_opts__last_field log_true_size
> +
>  struct bpf_map_create_opts {
>         size_t sz; /* size of this struct for forward/backward compatibility */
>
> @@ -57,9 +69,12 @@ struct bpf_map_create_opts {
>
>         const void *excl_prog_hash;
>         __u32 excl_prog_hash_size;
> +
> +       struct bpf_log_opts *log_opts;
> +
>         size_t :0;
>  };
> -#define bpf_map_create_opts__last_field excl_prog_hash_size
> +#define bpf_map_create_opts__last_field log_opts
>
>  LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type,
>                               const char *map_name,
> --
> 2.52.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/9] libbpf: Add support for extended bpf syscall
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/9] libbpf: Add support for extended bpf syscall Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2026-02-04 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leon Hwang
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing, Tao Chen,
	Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Anton Protopopov,
	Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api, linux-kselftest,
	kernel-patches-bot

On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:41 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> To support the extended BPF syscall introduced in the previous commit,
> introduce the following internal APIs:
>
> * 'sys_bpf_ext()'
> * 'sys_bpf_ext_fd()'
>   They wrap the raw 'syscall()' interface to support passing extended
>   attributes.
> * 'probe_sys_bpf_ext()'
>   Check whether current kernel supports the BPF syscall common attributes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c             | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/lib/bpf/features.c        |  8 ++++++++
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
>

LGTM

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

[...]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/9] bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/9] bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2026-02-05  2:20     ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2026-02-04 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leon Hwang
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing, Tao Chen,
	Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Anton Protopopov,
	Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api, linux-kselftest,
	kernel-patches-bot

On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:42 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> The next commit will add support for reporting logs via extended common
> attributes, including 'log_true_size'.
>
> To prepare for that, refactor the 'log_true_size' reporting logic by
> introducing a new struct bpf_log_attr to encapsulate log-related behavior:
>
>  * bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(): initialize the log fields, which will
>    support extended common attributes in the next commit.
>  * bpf_log_attr_finalize(): handle log finalization and write back
>    'log_true_size' to userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h          |  4 +++-
>  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 10 ++++++++++
>  kernel/bpf/log.c             | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c         |  8 +++++---
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 13 +++----------
>  5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index cd9b96434904..d4dbcc7ad156 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -2913,7 +2913,9 @@ int bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(bpfptr_t uaddr, size_t expected_size,
>                              size_t actual_size);
>
>  /* verify correctness of eBPF program */
> -int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **fp, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size);
> +struct bpf_log_attr;
> +int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **fp, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr,
> +             struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log);
>
>  #ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
>  void bpf_patch_call_args(struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 stack_depth);
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> index 8355b585cd18..c805b85b6f7a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> @@ -631,6 +631,16 @@ static inline bool bpf_verifier_log_needed(const struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
>         return log && log->level;
>  }
>
> +struct bpf_log_attr {
> +       u32 offsetof_true_size;
> +       u32 uattr_size;
> +       bpfptr_t uattr;
> +};
> +
> +int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
> +                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size);
> +int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
> +
>  #define BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS 256
>
>  struct bpf_subprog_arg_info {
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
> index a0c3b35de2ce..ff579fcba36f 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
> @@ -863,3 +863,38 @@ void print_insn_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_verifier_st
>         }
>         print_verifier_state(env, vstate, frameno, false);
>  }
> +
> +static void bpf_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, int offsetof_true_size, bpfptr_t uattr,
> +                             u32 uattr_size)
> +{
> +       memset(attr_log, 0, sizeof(*attr_log));
> +       attr_log->offsetof_true_size = offsetof_true_size;
> +       attr_log->uattr_size = uattr_size;
> +       attr_log->uattr = uattr;
> +}
> +
> +int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
> +                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size)
> +{
> +       bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size), uattr, size);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
> +{
> +       u32 log_true_size;
> +       size_t size;
> +       int err;
> +
> +       if (!log)
> +               return 0;

can this ever happen? why guard against this?

> +
> +       err = bpf_vlog_finalize(log, &log_true_size);
> +
> +       size = sizeof(log_true_size);
> +       if (attr->uattr_size >= attr->offsetof_true_size + size &&
> +           copy_to_bpfptr_offset(attr->uattr, attr->offsetof_true_size, &log_true_size, size))
> +               err = -EFAULT;

minor nit: return -EFAULT;

> +
> +       return err;
> +}

[...]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for prog_load
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support " Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2026-02-05  3:42     ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2026-02-04 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leon Hwang
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing, Tao Chen,
	Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Anton Protopopov,
	Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api, linux-kselftest,
	kernel-patches-bot

On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:42 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> BPF_PROG_LOAD can now provide log parameters through both union bpf_attr
> and struct bpf_common_attr. Define clear conflict and precedence rules:
>
> - if both are provided and log_buf/log_size/log_level match, use them;
> - if only one side provides a log buffer, use that one;
> - if both provide log buffers but differ, return -EINVAL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  3 ++-
>  kernel/bpf/log.c             | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c         |  3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> index c805b85b6f7a..0d106fddbbc5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> @@ -638,7 +638,8 @@ struct bpf_log_attr {
>  };
>
>  int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
> -                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size);
> +                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
> +                               bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common);
>  int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
>
>  #define BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS 256
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
> index ff579fcba36f..345005ba98dd 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
> @@ -873,10 +873,30 @@ static void bpf_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, int offsetof_true_s
>         attr_log->uattr = uattr;
>  }
>
> +static bool bpf_log_attrs_diff(struct bpf_common_attr *common, u64 log_buf, u32 log_size,
> +                              u32 log_level)
> +{
> +       return log_buf && common->log_buf && (log_buf != common->log_buf ||
> +                                             log_size != common->log_size ||
> +                                             log_level != common->log_level);

let's validate (unless we do this somewhere else) that if log_buf is
set, then log_size and log_level (? not sure, maybe zero is fine) are
set, or all three are not set. Same for common->log* fields...


> +}
> +
>  int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
> -                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size)
> +                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
> +                               bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common)
>  {
> -       bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size), uattr, size);
> +       if (bpf_log_attrs_diff(attr_common, attr->log_buf, attr->log_size, attr->log_level))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       if (!attr->log_buf && attr_common->log_buf) {
> +               attr->log_buf = attr_common->log_buf;
> +               attr->log_size = attr_common->log_size;
> +               attr->log_level = attr_common->log_level;

why are we setting this? Do we still have code that can access
attr->log_buf even though we pass attr_log everywhere? If yes, should
we still have that "split brain" code?

If we don't have this assignment, then I think we don't need to have
bpf_prog_load-specific and btf_load-specific log_attr_init() helpers.
They can be unified into generic log_attr_init, where for
bpf_prog_load you'll pass offsetof(log_true_size) +
attr->log_{buf,size,level}, and for btf_load you'll pass different
offset of and btf-specific attr->btf_log*

This helper will just be making decision whether to use common_attr's
log fields or passed directly command-specific ones.

Or what am I missing?


> +               bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(struct bpf_common_attr, log_true_size),
> +                                 uattr_common, size_common);
> +       } else {
> +               bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size), uattr, size);
> +       }
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index e81199361241..7125ea445c6c 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -6232,7 +6232,8 @@ static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size,
>                 err = map_freeze(&attr);
>                 break;
>         case BPF_PROG_LOAD:
> -               err = bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(&attr_log, &attr, uattr, size);
> +               err = bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(&attr_log, &attr, uattr, size, &attr_common,
> +                                                 uattr_common, size_common);
>                 err = err ?: bpf_prog_load(&attr, uattr, &attr_log);
>                 break;
>         case BPF_OBJ_PIN:
> --
> 2.52.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify map create failure log
  2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify map create failure log Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-04 20:14   ` Alexei Starovoitov
  2026-02-05  3:53     ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2026-02-04 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leon Hwang
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing, Tao Chen,
	Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Anton Protopopov,
	Amery Hung, Rong Tao, LKML, Linux API,
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, kernel-patches-bot

On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:43 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> +
> +#define BPF_LOG_FIXED  8
> +
> +static void test_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type, const char *map_name,
> +                           struct bpf_map_create_opts *opts, const char *exp_msg)
> +{
> +       const int key_size = 4, value_size = 4, max_entries = 1;
> +       char log_buf[128];
> +       int fd;
> +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_log_opts, log_opts);
> +
> +       log_buf[0] = '\0';
> +       log_opts.log_buf = log_buf;
> +       log_opts.log_size = sizeof(log_buf);
> +       log_opts.log_level = BPF_LOG_FIXED;

Why? Which part of the test needs the log with this flag?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/9] bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load
  2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2026-02-05  2:20     ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-05  2:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing, Tao Chen,
	Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Anton Protopopov,
	Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api, linux-kselftest,
	kernel-patches-bot



On 5/2/26 03:48, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:42 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> The next commit will add support for reporting logs via extended common
>> attributes, including 'log_true_size'.
>>
>> To prepare for that, refactor the 'log_true_size' reporting logic by
>> introducing a new struct bpf_log_attr to encapsulate log-related behavior:
>>
>>  * bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(): initialize the log fields, which will
>>    support extended common attributes in the next commit.
>>  * bpf_log_attr_finalize(): handle log finalization and write back
>>    'log_true_size' to userspace.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/bpf.h          |  4 +++-
>>  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 10 ++++++++++
>>  kernel/bpf/log.c             | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c         |  8 +++++---
>>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 13 +++----------
>>  5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
>> index cd9b96434904..d4dbcc7ad156 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -2913,7 +2913,9 @@ int bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(bpfptr_t uaddr, size_t expected_size,
>>                              size_t actual_size);
>>
>>  /* verify correctness of eBPF program */
>> -int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **fp, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size);
>> +struct bpf_log_attr;
>> +int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **fp, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr,
>> +             struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log);
>>
>>  #ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
>>  void bpf_patch_call_args(struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 stack_depth);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
>> index 8355b585cd18..c805b85b6f7a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
>> @@ -631,6 +631,16 @@ static inline bool bpf_verifier_log_needed(const struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
>>         return log && log->level;
>>  }
>>
>> +struct bpf_log_attr {
>> +       u32 offsetof_true_size;
>> +       u32 uattr_size;
>> +       bpfptr_t uattr;
>> +};
>> +
>> +int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
>> +                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size);
>> +int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
>> +
>>  #define BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS 256
>>
>>  struct bpf_subprog_arg_info {
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
>> index a0c3b35de2ce..ff579fcba36f 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
>> @@ -863,3 +863,38 @@ void print_insn_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_verifier_st
>>         }
>>         print_verifier_state(env, vstate, frameno, false);
>>  }
>> +
>> +static void bpf_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, int offsetof_true_size, bpfptr_t uattr,
>> +                             u32 uattr_size)
>> +{
>> +       memset(attr_log, 0, sizeof(*attr_log));
>> +       attr_log->offsetof_true_size = offsetof_true_size;
>> +       attr_log->uattr_size = uattr_size;
>> +       attr_log->uattr = uattr;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
>> +                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size)
>> +{
>> +       bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size), uattr, size);
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
>> +{
>> +       u32 log_true_size;
>> +       size_t size;
>> +       int err;
>> +
>> +       if (!log)
>> +               return 0;
> 
> can this ever happen? why guard against this?
> 

In patch #7, 'log' can be NULL when users do not provide 'log_buf'.

However, bpf_vlog_finalize() already guards against this case, so I'll
drop this check.

>> +
>> +       err = bpf_vlog_finalize(log, &log_true_size);
>> +
>> +       size = sizeof(log_true_size);
>> +       if (attr->uattr_size >= attr->offsetof_true_size + size &&
>> +           copy_to_bpfptr_offset(attr->uattr, attr->offsetof_true_size, &log_true_size, size))
>> +               err = -EFAULT;
> 
> minor nit: return -EFAULT;
> 

Ack.

Thanks,
Leon



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for prog_load
  2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2026-02-05  3:42     ` Leon Hwang
  2026-02-05 22:18       ` Andrii Nakryiko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-05  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing, Tao Chen,
	Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Anton Protopopov,
	Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api, linux-kselftest,
	kernel-patches-bot



On 5/2/26 03:48, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:42 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> BPF_PROG_LOAD can now provide log parameters through both union bpf_attr
>> and struct bpf_common_attr. Define clear conflict and precedence rules:
>>
>> - if both are provided and log_buf/log_size/log_level match, use them;
>> - if only one side provides a log buffer, use that one;
>> - if both provide log buffers but differ, return -EINVAL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  3 ++-
>>  kernel/bpf/log.c             | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c         |  3 ++-
>>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
>> index c805b85b6f7a..0d106fddbbc5 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
>> @@ -638,7 +638,8 @@ struct bpf_log_attr {
>>  };
>>
>>  int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
>> -                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size);
>> +                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
>> +                               bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common);
>>  int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
>>
>>  #define BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS 256
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
>> index ff579fcba36f..345005ba98dd 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
>> @@ -873,10 +873,30 @@ static void bpf_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, int offsetof_true_s
>>         attr_log->uattr = uattr;
>>  }
>>
>> +static bool bpf_log_attrs_diff(struct bpf_common_attr *common, u64 log_buf, u32 log_size,
>> +                              u32 log_level)
>> +{
>> +       return log_buf && common->log_buf && (log_buf != common->log_buf ||
>> +                                             log_size != common->log_size ||
>> +                                             log_level != common->log_level);
> 
> let's validate (unless we do this somewhere else) that if log_buf is
> set, then log_size and log_level (? not sure, maybe zero is fine) are
> set, or all three are not set. Same for common->log* fields...
> 

Ack.

Will validate 'log_buf && log_size && log_level' first.

> 
>> +}
>> +
>>  int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
>> -                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size)
>> +                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
>> +                               bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common)
>>  {
>> -       bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size), uattr, size);
>> +       if (bpf_log_attrs_diff(attr_common, attr->log_buf, attr->log_size, attr->log_level))
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       if (!attr->log_buf && attr_common->log_buf) {
>> +               attr->log_buf = attr_common->log_buf;
>> +               attr->log_size = attr_common->log_size;
>> +               attr->log_level = attr_common->log_level;
> 
> why are we setting this? Do we still have code that can access
> attr->log_buf even though we pass attr_log everywhere? If yes, should
> we still have that "split brain" code?
> 

'attr->log_buf' is accessed only in bpf_check().

> If we don't have this assignment, then I think we don't need to have
> bpf_prog_load-specific and btf_load-specific log_attr_init() helpers.
> They can be unified into generic log_attr_init, where for
> bpf_prog_load you'll pass offsetof(log_true_size) +
> attr->log_{buf,size,level}, and for btf_load you'll pass different
> offset of and btf-specific attr->btf_log*
> 
> This helper will just be making decision whether to use common_attr's
> log fields or passed directly command-specific ones.
> 
> Or what am I missing?
> 

If the log attributes differ, where should the effective
log_* values be stored?

Should they live in struct bpf_common_attr, or should we extend
struct bpf_log_attr to carry them?

Note that in v8, Alexei suggested struct bpf_log_attr only needs
  u32 offsetof_true_size;
  bpfptr_t uattr;

so I’d like to clarify the intended direction here. Once that’s clear, a
single generic log_attr_init() should be sufficient to handle this.

Thanks,
Leon

> 
>> +               bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(struct bpf_common_attr, log_true_size),
>> +                                 uattr_common, size_common);
>> +       } else {
>> +               bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size), uattr, size);
>> +       }
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>> index e81199361241..7125ea445c6c 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>> @@ -6232,7 +6232,8 @@ static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size,
>>                 err = map_freeze(&attr);
>>                 break;
>>         case BPF_PROG_LOAD:
>> -               err = bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(&attr_log, &attr, uattr, size);
>> +               err = bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(&attr_log, &attr, uattr, size, &attr_common,
>> +                                                 uattr_common, size_common);
>>                 err = err ?: bpf_prog_load(&attr, uattr, &attr_log);
>>                 break;
>>         case BPF_OBJ_PIN:
>> --
>> 2.52.0
>>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 8/9] libbpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create
  2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2026-02-05  3:45     ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-05  3:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing, Tao Chen,
	Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Anton Protopopov,
	Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api, linux-kselftest,
	kernel-patches-bot



On 5/2/26 03:48, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:43 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> With the previous commit adding common attribute support for
>> BPF_MAP_CREATE, users can now retrieve detailed error messages when map
>> creation fails via the log_buf field.
>>
>> Introduce struct bpf_log_opts with the following fields:
>> log_buf, log_size, log_level, and log_true_size.
>>
>> Extend bpf_map_create_opts with a new field log_opts, allowing users to
>> capture and inspect log messages on map creation failures.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> LGTM
> 
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> 

Thanks for your review.

>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
>> index 9d8740761b7a..0c3e40844d80 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
>> @@ -209,6 +209,9 @@ int bpf_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type,
>>                    const struct bpf_map_create_opts *opts)
>>  {
>>         const size_t attr_sz = offsetofend(union bpf_attr, excl_prog_hash_size);
>> +       const size_t attr_common_sz = sizeof(struct bpf_common_attr);
>> +       struct bpf_common_attr attr_common;
>> +       struct bpf_log_opts *log_opts;
>>         union bpf_attr attr;
>>         int fd;
>>
>> @@ -242,7 +245,18 @@ int bpf_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type,
>>         attr.excl_prog_hash = ptr_to_u64(OPTS_GET(opts, excl_prog_hash, NULL));
>>         attr.excl_prog_hash_size = OPTS_GET(opts, excl_prog_hash_size, 0);
>>
>> -       fd = sys_bpf_fd(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, attr_sz);
>> +       log_opts = OPTS_GET(opts, log_opts, NULL);
>> +       if (log_opts && feat_supported(NULL, FEAT_BPF_SYSCALL_COMMON_ATTRS)) {
>> +               memset(&attr_common, 0, attr_common_sz);
>> +               attr_common.log_buf = ptr_to_u64(OPTS_GET(log_opts, log_buf, NULL));
>> +               attr_common.log_size = OPTS_GET(log_opts, log_size, 0);
>> +               attr_common.log_level = OPTS_GET(log_opts, log_level, 0);
>> +               fd = sys_bpf_ext_fd(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, attr_sz, &attr_common, attr_common_sz);
>> +               OPTS_SET(log_opts, log_true_size, attr_common.log_true_size);
>> +       } else {
>> +               fd = sys_bpf_fd(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, attr_sz);
>> +               OPTS_SET(log_opts, log_true_size, 0);
>> +       }
>>         return libbpf_err_errno(fd);
>>  }
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
>> index 2c8e88ddb674..59673f094f86 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
>> @@ -37,6 +37,18 @@ extern "C" {
>>
>>  LIBBPF_API int libbpf_set_memlock_rlim(size_t memlock_bytes);
>>
>> +struct bpf_log_opts {
>> +       size_t sz; /* size of this struct for forward/backward compatibility */
>> +
>> +       char *log_buf;
>> +       __u32 log_size;
>> +       __u32 log_level;
>> +       __u32 log_true_size;
> 
> please mention in the comment here that this is an out parameter set
> by the kernel
> 

Ack.

I'll add a comment in the next revision.

Thanks,
Leon

>> +
>> +       size_t :0;
>> +};
>> +#define bpf_log_opts__last_field log_true_size
>> +
>>  struct bpf_map_create_opts {
>>         size_t sz; /* size of this struct for forward/backward compatibility */
>>
>> @@ -57,9 +69,12 @@ struct bpf_map_create_opts {
>>
>>         const void *excl_prog_hash;
>>         __u32 excl_prog_hash_size;
>> +
>> +       struct bpf_log_opts *log_opts;
>> +
>>         size_t :0;
>>  };
>> -#define bpf_map_create_opts__last_field excl_prog_hash_size
>> +#define bpf_map_create_opts__last_field log_opts
>>
>>  LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type,
>>                               const char *map_name,
>> --
>> 2.52.0
>>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify map create failure log
  2026-02-04 20:14   ` Alexei Starovoitov
@ 2026-02-05  3:53     ` Leon Hwang
  2026-02-05 23:18       ` Alexei Starovoitov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-05  3:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing, Tao Chen,
	Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Anton Protopopov,
	Amery Hung, Rong Tao, LKML, Linux API,
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, kernel-patches-bot



On 5/2/26 04:14, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:43 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> +
>> +#define BPF_LOG_FIXED  8
>> +
>> +static void test_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type, const char *map_name,
>> +                           struct bpf_map_create_opts *opts, const char *exp_msg)
>> +{
>> +       const int key_size = 4, value_size = 4, max_entries = 1;
>> +       char log_buf[128];
>> +       int fd;
>> +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_log_opts, log_opts);
>> +
>> +       log_buf[0] = '\0';
>> +       log_opts.log_buf = log_buf;
>> +       log_opts.log_size = sizeof(log_buf);
>> +       log_opts.log_level = BPF_LOG_FIXED;
> 
> Why? Which part of the test needs the log with this flag?

BPF_LOG_FIXED looks odd here.

This test sets 'log_level = BPF_LOG_FIXED' to match the behavior of
bpf_vlog_init() as initialized by bpf_log_attr_create_vlog() in
patch #7. BPF_LOG_FIXED is intended to be the default log_level
there.

Thanks,
Leon





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for prog_load
  2026-02-05  3:42     ` Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-05 22:18       ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2026-02-06  2:45         ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2026-02-05 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leon Hwang
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing, Tao Chen,
	Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Anton Protopopov,
	Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api, linux-kselftest,
	kernel-patches-bot

On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 7:42 PM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/2/26 03:48, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:42 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
> >>
> >> BPF_PROG_LOAD can now provide log parameters through both union bpf_attr
> >> and struct bpf_common_attr. Define clear conflict and precedence rules:
> >>
> >> - if both are provided and log_buf/log_size/log_level match, use them;
> >> - if only one side provides a log buffer, use that one;
> >> - if both provide log buffers but differ, return -EINVAL.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> >> ---
> >>  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  3 ++-
> >>  kernel/bpf/log.c             | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c         |  3 ++-
> >>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> >> index c805b85b6f7a..0d106fddbbc5 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> >> @@ -638,7 +638,8 @@ struct bpf_log_attr {
> >>  };
> >>
> >>  int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
> >> -                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size);
> >> +                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
> >> +                               bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common);
> >>  int bpf_log_attr_finalize(struct bpf_log_attr *attr, struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
> >>
> >>  #define BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS 256
> >> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
> >> index ff579fcba36f..345005ba98dd 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
> >> @@ -873,10 +873,30 @@ static void bpf_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, int offsetof_true_s
> >>         attr_log->uattr = uattr;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> +static bool bpf_log_attrs_diff(struct bpf_common_attr *common, u64 log_buf, u32 log_size,
> >> +                              u32 log_level)
> >> +{
> >> +       return log_buf && common->log_buf && (log_buf != common->log_buf ||
> >> +                                             log_size != common->log_size ||
> >> +                                             log_level != common->log_level);
> >
> > let's validate (unless we do this somewhere else) that if log_buf is
> > set, then log_size and log_level (? not sure, maybe zero is fine) are
> > set, or all three are not set. Same for common->log* fields...
> >
>
> Ack.
>
> Will validate 'log_buf && log_size && log_level' first.
>
> >
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  int bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(struct bpf_log_attr *attr_log, union bpf_attr *attr,
> >> -                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size)
> >> +                               bpfptr_t uattr, u32 size, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
> >> +                               bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common)
> >>  {
> >> -       bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size), uattr, size);
> >> +       if (bpf_log_attrs_diff(attr_common, attr->log_buf, attr->log_size, attr->log_level))
> >> +               return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> +       if (!attr->log_buf && attr_common->log_buf) {
> >> +               attr->log_buf = attr_common->log_buf;
> >> +               attr->log_size = attr_common->log_size;
> >> +               attr->log_level = attr_common->log_level;
> >
> > why are we setting this? Do we still have code that can access
> > attr->log_buf even though we pass attr_log everywhere? If yes, should
> > we still have that "split brain" code?
> >
>
> 'attr->log_buf' is accessed only in bpf_check().

bpf_check should be changed then, see below

>
> > If we don't have this assignment, then I think we don't need to have
> > bpf_prog_load-specific and btf_load-specific log_attr_init() helpers.
> > They can be unified into generic log_attr_init, where for
> > bpf_prog_load you'll pass offsetof(log_true_size) +
> > attr->log_{buf,size,level}, and for btf_load you'll pass different
> > offset of and btf-specific attr->btf_log*
> >
> > This helper will just be making decision whether to use common_attr's
> > log fields or passed directly command-specific ones.
> >
> > Or what am I missing?
> >
>
> If the log attributes differ, where should the effective
> log_* values be stored?
>
> Should they live in struct bpf_common_attr, or should we extend
> struct bpf_log_attr to carry them?
>
> Note that in v8, Alexei suggested struct bpf_log_attr only needs
>   u32 offsetof_true_size;
>   bpfptr_t uattr;
>
> so I’d like to clarify the intended direction here. Once that’s clear, a
> single generic log_attr_init() should be sufficient to handle this.
>

The intended direction is to have log buf/size/level in one place
(after attr and common_attr validations), so we keep internal logic
simple. Let's put all of that and log_true_size **pointer** (we don't
have to much with offsetof, just calculate user addr for
log_true_size, which just might be NULL) into bpf_log_attrs and teach
all code to look and work *only* with that struct, ignoring anything
log related from attr.

> Thanks,
> Leon
>
> >
> >> +               bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(struct bpf_common_attr, log_true_size),
> >> +                                 uattr_common, size_common);
> >> +       } else {
> >> +               bpf_log_attr_init(attr_log, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size), uattr, size);
> >> +       }
> >>         return 0;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> >> index e81199361241..7125ea445c6c 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> >> @@ -6232,7 +6232,8 @@ static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size,
> >>                 err = map_freeze(&attr);
> >>                 break;
> >>         case BPF_PROG_LOAD:
> >> -               err = bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(&attr_log, &attr, uattr, size);
> >> +               err = bpf_prog_load_log_attr_init(&attr_log, &attr, uattr, size, &attr_common,
> >> +                                                 uattr_common, size_common);
> >>                 err = err ?: bpf_prog_load(&attr, uattr, &attr_log);
> >>                 break;
> >>         case BPF_OBJ_PIN:
> >> --
> >> 2.52.0
> >>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify map create failure log
  2026-02-05  3:53     ` Leon Hwang
@ 2026-02-05 23:18       ` Alexei Starovoitov
  2026-02-06  2:50         ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2026-02-05 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leon Hwang
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing, Tao Chen,
	Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Anton Protopopov,
	Amery Hung, Rong Tao, LKML, Linux API,
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, kernel-patches-bot

On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 7:54 PM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/2/26 04:14, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:43 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
> >>
> >> +
> >> +#define BPF_LOG_FIXED  8
> >> +
> >> +static void test_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type, const char *map_name,
> >> +                           struct bpf_map_create_opts *opts, const char *exp_msg)
> >> +{
> >> +       const int key_size = 4, value_size = 4, max_entries = 1;
> >> +       char log_buf[128];
> >> +       int fd;
> >> +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_log_opts, log_opts);
> >> +
> >> +       log_buf[0] = '\0';
> >> +       log_opts.log_buf = log_buf;
> >> +       log_opts.log_size = sizeof(log_buf);
> >> +       log_opts.log_level = BPF_LOG_FIXED;
> >
> > Why? Which part of the test needs the log with this flag?
>
> BPF_LOG_FIXED looks odd here.
>
> This test sets 'log_level = BPF_LOG_FIXED' to match the behavior of
> bpf_vlog_init() as initialized by bpf_log_attr_create_vlog() in
> patch #7. BPF_LOG_FIXED is intended to be the default log_level
> there.

I don't think you answered my question.
bpf_vlog_init() is using whatever log_level user space provided.
Why do you pass BPF_LOG_FIXED ?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for prog_load
  2026-02-05 22:18       ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2026-02-06  2:45         ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-06  2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing, Tao Chen,
	Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Anton Protopopov,
	Amery Hung, Rong Tao, linux-kernel, linux-api, linux-kselftest,
	kernel-patches-bot



On 6/2/26 06:18, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 7:42 PM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:

[...]

>>>> +
>>>> +       if (!attr->log_buf && attr_common->log_buf) {
>>>> +               attr->log_buf = attr_common->log_buf;
>>>> +               attr->log_size = attr_common->log_size;
>>>> +               attr->log_level = attr_common->log_level;
>>>
>>> why are we setting this? Do we still have code that can access
>>> attr->log_buf even though we pass attr_log everywhere? If yes, should
>>> we still have that "split brain" code?
>>>
>>
>> 'attr->log_buf' is accessed only in bpf_check().
> 
> bpf_check should be changed then, see below
> 
>>
>>> If we don't have this assignment, then I think we don't need to have
>>> bpf_prog_load-specific and btf_load-specific log_attr_init() helpers.
>>> They can be unified into generic log_attr_init, where for
>>> bpf_prog_load you'll pass offsetof(log_true_size) +
>>> attr->log_{buf,size,level}, and for btf_load you'll pass different
>>> offset of and btf-specific attr->btf_log*
>>>
>>> This helper will just be making decision whether to use common_attr's
>>> log fields or passed directly command-specific ones.
>>>
>>> Or what am I missing?
>>>
>>
>> If the log attributes differ, where should the effective
>> log_* values be stored?
>>
>> Should they live in struct bpf_common_attr, or should we extend
>> struct bpf_log_attr to carry them?
>>
>> Note that in v8, Alexei suggested struct bpf_log_attr only needs
>>   u32 offsetof_true_size;
>>   bpfptr_t uattr;
>>
>> so I’d like to clarify the intended direction here. Once that’s clear, a
>> single generic log_attr_init() should be sufficient to handle this.
>>
> 
> The intended direction is to have log buf/size/level in one place
> (after attr and common_attr validations), so we keep internal logic
> simple. Let's put all of that and log_true_size **pointer** (we don't
> have to much with offsetof, just calculate user addr for
> log_true_size, which just might be NULL) into bpf_log_attrs and teach
> all code to look and work *only* with that struct, ignoring anything
> log related from attr.
> 
It’s clear now.

I’ll follow this direction in the next revision and consolidate all
log-related fields (including the log_true_size pointer) into
bpf_log_attr, so that internal code relies solely on that struct.

Thanks,
Leon


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify map create failure log
  2026-02-05 23:18       ` Alexei Starovoitov
@ 2026-02-06  2:50         ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2026-02-06  2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
	Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner, Seth Forshee, Yuichiro Tsuji,
	Andrey Albershteyn, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Xing, Tao Chen,
	Mykyta Yatsenko, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Anton Protopopov,
	Amery Hung, Rong Tao, LKML, Linux API,
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, kernel-patches-bot



On 6/2/26 07:18, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 7:54 PM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/2/26 04:14, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:43 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +#define BPF_LOG_FIXED  8
>>>> +
>>>> +static void test_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type, const char *map_name,
>>>> +                           struct bpf_map_create_opts *opts, const char *exp_msg)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       const int key_size = 4, value_size = 4, max_entries = 1;
>>>> +       char log_buf[128];
>>>> +       int fd;
>>>> +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_log_opts, log_opts);
>>>> +
>>>> +       log_buf[0] = '\0';
>>>> +       log_opts.log_buf = log_buf;
>>>> +       log_opts.log_size = sizeof(log_buf);
>>>> +       log_opts.log_level = BPF_LOG_FIXED;
>>>
>>> Why? Which part of the test needs the log with this flag?
>>
>> BPF_LOG_FIXED looks odd here.
>>
>> This test sets 'log_level = BPF_LOG_FIXED' to match the behavior of
>> bpf_vlog_init() as initialized by bpf_log_attr_create_vlog() in
>> patch #7. BPF_LOG_FIXED is intended to be the default log_level
>> there.
> 
> I don't think you answered my question.
> bpf_vlog_init() is using whatever log_level user space provided.
> Why do you pass BPF_LOG_FIXED ?
>

The intention behind passing BPF_LOG_FIXED was to ensure the log used
the buffer in a fixed mode, since the allocated buffer was large enough
to hold the full log message from the kernel. It was not intended to
test against log_level itself.

After reviewing commit 121664093803 ("bpf: Switch BPF verifier log to be
a rotating log by default"), I realized that BPF_LOG_FIXED was
introduced specifically to disable the rotating log behavior. In this
test case, that distinction is not relevant, so BPF_LOG_FIXED is indeed
unnecessary.

I tested with 'log_level is 0' and 'log_level is non-zero'. The tests
fail when log_level is 0, and pass when log_level is non-zero. So I will
switch to using 'log_level = 1' in the next revision.

Thanks,
Leon


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-06  2:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-02 14:40 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/9] " Leon Hwang
2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/9] libbpf: Add support for extended bpf syscall Leon Hwang
2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/9] bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load Leon Hwang
2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-02-05  2:20     ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support " Leon Hwang
2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-02-05  3:42     ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-05 22:18       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-02-06  2:45         ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/9] bpf: Refactor reporting btf_log_true_size for btf_load Leon Hwang
2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support " Leon Hwang
2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/9] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create Leon Hwang
2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 8/9] libbpf: " Leon Hwang
2026-02-04 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-02-05  3:45     ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-02 14:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify map create failure log Leon Hwang
2026-02-04 20:14   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-05  3:53     ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-05 23:18       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-06  2:50         ` Leon Hwang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox