From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
Cc: <dave@stgolabs.net>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cxl/core: Set cxlmd->endpoint to NULL by default
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 14:41:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202144103.000016cb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260201093002.1281858-2-ming.li@zohomail.com>
On Sun, 1 Feb 2026 17:30:01 +0800
Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com> wrote:
> CXL testing environment can trigger following trace
>
> Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000092: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
> KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000490-0x0000000000000497]
> RIP: 0010:cxl_dpa_to_region+0x105/0x1f0 [cxl_core]
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> cxl_event_trace_record+0xd1/0xa70 [cxl_core]
> __cxl_event_trace_record+0x12f/0x1e0 [cxl_core]
> cxl_mem_get_records_log+0x261/0x500 [cxl_core]
> cxl_mem_get_event_records+0x7c/0xc0 [cxl_core]
> cxl_mock_mem_probe+0xd38/0x1c60 [cxl_mock_mem]
> platform_probe+0x9d/0x130
> really_probe+0x1c8/0x960
> __driver_probe_device+0x187/0x3e0
> driver_probe_device+0x45/0x120
> __device_attach_driver+0x15d/0x280
>
> commit 29317f8dc6ed ("cxl/mem: Introduce cxl_memdev_attach for CXL-dependent operation")
> initializes cxlmd->endpoint to ERR_PTR(-ENXIO) in cxl_memdev_alloc().
> However, cxl_dpa_to_region() treats a non-NULL cxlmd->endpoint as a
> valid endpoint.
>
> Across the CXL core, endpoint availability is generally determined by
> checking whether it is NULL. Align with this convention by initializing
> cxlmd->endpoint to NULL by default.
I had a look at whether it made sense to use use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to check
for validity of the endpoint, but it would be somewhat fiddly and I think
you are correct that convention here seems to be NULL means not set.
We don't need the error code. One comment inline.
Either way nice catch
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
>
> Fixes: 29317f8dc6ed ("cxl/mem: Introduce cxl_memdev_attach for CXL-dependent operation")
> Signed-off-by: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> index af3d0cc65138..41a507b5daa4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ static struct cxl_memdev *cxl_memdev_alloc(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
> cxlmd->id = rc;
> cxlmd->depth = -1;
> cxlmd->attach = attach;
> - cxlmd->endpoint = ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
> + cxlmd->endpoint = NULL;
cxlmd has just been allocated with kzalloc so I'd argue we don't need this to be explicitly
set at all. Seems like a natural and safe default.
>
> dev = &cxlmd->dev;
> device_initialize(dev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-01 9:30 [PATCH 0/2] Fix port enumeration failure and NULL endpoint issue Li Ming
2026-02-01 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] cxl/core: Set cxlmd->endpoint to NULL by default Li Ming
2026-02-02 14:41 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-02-02 15:48 ` Gregory Price
2026-02-03 14:15 ` Li Ming
2026-02-02 21:04 ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-03 15:04 ` Li Ming
2026-02-03 0:01 ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-03 15:15 ` Li Ming
2026-02-03 22:37 ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-01 9:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] cxl/core: Hold grandparent port lock while dport adding Li Ming
2026-02-02 15:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-03 14:23 ` Li Ming
2026-02-03 21:14 ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-02 16:31 ` Gregory Price
2026-02-03 14:33 ` Li Ming
2026-02-03 0:07 ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-03 15:21 ` Li Ming
2026-02-03 22:25 ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-04 13:51 ` Li Ming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260202144103.000016cb@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox