public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
Cc: <dave@stgolabs.net>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cxl/core: Set cxlmd->endpoint to NULL by default
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 14:41:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202144103.000016cb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260201093002.1281858-2-ming.li@zohomail.com>

On Sun,  1 Feb 2026 17:30:01 +0800
Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com> wrote:

> CXL testing environment can trigger following trace
> 
>  Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000092: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
>  KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000490-0x0000000000000497]
>  RIP: 0010:cxl_dpa_to_region+0x105/0x1f0 [cxl_core]
>  Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   cxl_event_trace_record+0xd1/0xa70 [cxl_core]
>   __cxl_event_trace_record+0x12f/0x1e0 [cxl_core]
>   cxl_mem_get_records_log+0x261/0x500 [cxl_core]
>   cxl_mem_get_event_records+0x7c/0xc0 [cxl_core]
>   cxl_mock_mem_probe+0xd38/0x1c60 [cxl_mock_mem]
>   platform_probe+0x9d/0x130
>   really_probe+0x1c8/0x960
>   __driver_probe_device+0x187/0x3e0
>   driver_probe_device+0x45/0x120
>   __device_attach_driver+0x15d/0x280
> 
> commit 29317f8dc6ed ("cxl/mem: Introduce cxl_memdev_attach for CXL-dependent operation")
> initializes cxlmd->endpoint to ERR_PTR(-ENXIO) in cxl_memdev_alloc().
> However, cxl_dpa_to_region() treats a non-NULL cxlmd->endpoint as a
> valid endpoint.
> 
> Across the CXL core, endpoint availability is generally determined by
> checking whether it is NULL. Align with this convention by initializing
> cxlmd->endpoint to NULL by default.

I had a look at whether it made sense to use use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to check
for validity of the endpoint, but it would be somewhat fiddly and I think
you are correct that convention here seems to be NULL means not set.
We don't need the error code.  One comment inline.

Either way nice catch
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>


> 
> Fixes: 29317f8dc6ed ("cxl/mem: Introduce cxl_memdev_attach for CXL-dependent operation")
> Signed-off-by: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> index af3d0cc65138..41a507b5daa4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ static struct cxl_memdev *cxl_memdev_alloc(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
>  	cxlmd->id = rc;
>  	cxlmd->depth = -1;
>  	cxlmd->attach = attach;
> -	cxlmd->endpoint = ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
> +	cxlmd->endpoint = NULL;
cxlmd has just been allocated with kzalloc so I'd argue we don't need this to be explicitly
set at all.  Seems like a natural and safe default.

>  
>  	dev = &cxlmd->dev;
>  	device_initialize(dev);


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-02 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-01  9:30 [PATCH 0/2] Fix port enumeration failure and NULL endpoint issue Li Ming
2026-02-01  9:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] cxl/core: Set cxlmd->endpoint to NULL by default Li Ming
2026-02-02 14:41   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-02-02 15:48     ` Gregory Price
2026-02-03 14:15     ` Li Ming
2026-02-02 21:04   ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-03 15:04     ` Li Ming
2026-02-03  0:01   ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-03 15:15     ` Li Ming
2026-02-03 22:37       ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-01  9:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] cxl/core: Hold grandparent port lock while dport adding Li Ming
2026-02-02 15:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-03 14:23     ` Li Ming
2026-02-03 21:14       ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-02 16:31   ` Gregory Price
2026-02-03 14:33     ` Li Ming
2026-02-03  0:07   ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-03 15:21     ` Li Ming
2026-02-03 22:25       ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-04 13:51         ` Li Ming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260202144103.000016cb@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox