From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8391318ED4; Mon, 2 Feb 2026 23:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770076694; cv=none; b=uGT0SRT5tb31f+Uj6YTXXMFqoGJPvjTZFtw4JS+YpMy/mjRm4zV92T7qBfM0CmR7j2+WeJWyp1MI7RS1C9eCSKfVGupmdDEEueGHN4vsLkj7ZaLw3ksn61vpWjTeA+Ecl2YVmsWGFtYrRf/tlHjrcLBYzKuvCgU/y3o4m0L3zy8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770076694; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BRzLYgVhduJBkOdpDGMvQh4aM+Uyxm2O3nUvq4ILHMo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=G4gERo2XMv47I7z4Dxp0I1vI4uToN4PsL93fqiMb9lapu58N09u7rCXzzMhZVQzzLUO8fL6JmdWvYp2ZM4d/kvUdYN8ihwuFEgnyVC8CH0R5Ffs4jRrfBsqHDH4IxP56rQacLf6kTPBK2WHTGKcVe8CmjnjJELxBQ0UFTI0IiXM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XIR2hMpk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XIR2hMpk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15747C116C6; Mon, 2 Feb 2026 23:58:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770076694; bh=BRzLYgVhduJBkOdpDGMvQh4aM+Uyxm2O3nUvq4ILHMo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XIR2hMpkUMbhV1MpUhritR1FLGXUgquvWgO+cNXu5uIv3h6mT47Es8QhNileswiVR BZWZgFSxGoU5G8yrZQDufhvQ3Mj0Wqb1knY1oX+J3pPveV1n6c0u9DuUdnmPeSLa9g /rrIDZHPlJwzvMEpL3e8OlvzExblqQrdLksg/Ll0WWbgSiLO0MxudHUM3+kiQn1BTU xiY5lHWFewarOGX+MX7o12YOYAQTiLQR3Z521BySibAmGmXjDIYmUPKNKOhBYslXTU MIw71MZsNU8LpfTMksiQbcSIrzo8r0cdHnu08MkYFHwIRYSuWW4pzY7lu4VxkQRsWu tYf+Rr9Yi3V5A== Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 15:58:13 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Petr Oros Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ivecera@redhat.com, mschmidt@redhat.com, Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Stanislav Fomichev , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] iavf: fix deadlock in reset handling Message-ID: <20260202155813.3f8fbc27@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260202084820.260033-1-poros@redhat.com> References: <20260202084820.260033-1-poros@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2 Feb 2026 09:48:20 +0100 Petr Oros wrote: > + netdev_unlock(netdev); > + ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(adapter->reset_waitqueue, > + !iavf_is_reset_in_progress(adapter), > + msecs_to_jiffies(5000)); > + netdev_lock(netdev); Dropping locks taken by the core around the driver callback is obviously unacceptable. SMH.