public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI: Add support for ACS Enhanced Capability
@ 2026-02-02 11:33 Wei Wang
  2026-02-02 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: Enable the enhanced ACS controls introduced by PCI_ACS_ECAP Wei Wang
  2026-02-02 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: Add the enhanced ACS controls check to pci_acs_flags_enabled() Wei Wang
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wei Wang @ 2026-02-02 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, jgg, akpm, bp, rdunlap, alex, kevin.tian
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-pci, wei.w.wang

This patchset adds support for the Access Control Services (ACS) Enhanced
Capability, introduced with PCIe Gen 5. The ACS Enhanced Capability
provides additional access control features that improve device isolation
— particularly important in virtualization scenarios where devices are
passed through to different virtual machines (VMs). Strong isolation is
critical to ensure security between devices assigned to different VMs and
the host.

In Linux, device grouping assumes that devices in separate IOMMU groups
are properly isolated. To uphold this assumption, the enhanced ACS
controls are enabled by default on hardware that supports the PCI_ACS_ECAP
capability. As with other basic ACS access controls, these new controls
can be configured via the config_acs= boot parameter.

Support for checking the enhanced ACS controls on Root and Downstream
Ports has been added to pci_acs_enabled(). On devices that support
PCI_ACS_ECAP, these controls must be properly enabled. To maintain
compatibility with legacy devices that lack PCI_ACS_ECAP support,
pci_acs_enabled() simply skips the check.

v2->v3 changes:
- Drop the warning when a device has no support for the enhanced
  capability.
  v2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/SI2PR01MB4393B836EA4FEDD1823483BADC94A@SI2PR01MB4393.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com/

v1->v2 changes:
- Enabled all enhanced ACS controls by default, rather than just Unclaimed
  Request Redirect (which addressed the primary issue we encountered).
- Added checks for enhanced ACS controls on Root and Downstream Ports in
  pci_acs_enabled() to ensure proper enablement when grouping devices or
  enabling features such as IOMMU PASID.
  v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/SI2PR01MB43931A911357962A5E986FFEDC8CA@SI2PR01MB4393.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com/

Thanks to Jason Gunthorpe for reviewing the patchset.

Wei Wang (2):
  PCI: Enable the enhanced ACS controls introduced by PCI_ACS_ECAP
  PCI: Add the enhanced ACS controls check to pci_acs_flags_enabled()

 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         | 23 ++++--
 drivers/pci/pci.c                             | 78 ++++++++++++++++++-
 include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h                 |  7 ++
 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)


base-commit: 4c87cdd0328495759f6e9f9f4e1e53ef8032a76f
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: Enable the enhanced ACS controls introduced by PCI_ACS_ECAP
  2026-02-02 11:33 [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI: Add support for ACS Enhanced Capability Wei Wang
@ 2026-02-02 11:33 ` Wei Wang
  2026-02-02 16:02   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2026-02-02 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: Add the enhanced ACS controls check to pci_acs_flags_enabled() Wei Wang
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wei Wang @ 2026-02-02 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, jgg, akpm, bp, rdunlap, alex, kevin.tian
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-pci, wei.w.wang

The ACS Enhanced Capability introduces several new access controls to
improve device isolation. These new controls are particularly important
for device passthrough in virtualization scenarios.

For example, a DMA transaction from a device may target a guest physical
address that lies within the memory aperture of the switch's upstream
port, but not within any memory aperture or BAR space of a downstream
port. In such cases, the switch would generate an Unsupported Request (UR)
response to the device, which is undesirable. Enabling Unclaimed Request
Redirect Control ensures that these DMA requests are forwarded upstream
instead of being rejected.

The ACS DSP and USP Memory Target Access Control and ACS I/O Request
Blocking features similarly enhance device isolation. Device grouping in
Linux assumes that devices are properly isolated. Therefore, enable these
controls by default if PCI_ACS_ECAP is supported by the hardware. As with
other basic ACS access controls, these new controls can be configured via
the config_acs= boot parameter.

Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@hotmail.com>
---
 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         | 23 +++++++++++++------
 drivers/pci/pci.c                             | 13 ++++++++++-
 include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h                 |  7 ++++++
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 6b3460701910..07ca2b18248c 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -5276,13 +5276,22 @@ Kernel parameters
 				flags.
 
 				ACS Flags is defined as follows:
-				  bit-0 : ACS Source Validation
-				  bit-1 : ACS Translation Blocking
-				  bit-2 : ACS P2P Request Redirect
-				  bit-3 : ACS P2P Completion Redirect
-				  bit-4 : ACS Upstream Forwarding
-				  bit-5 : ACS P2P Egress Control
-				  bit-6 : ACS Direct Translated P2P
+				  bit-0     : ACS Source Validation
+				  bit-1     : ACS Translation Blocking
+				  bit-2     : ACS P2P Request Redirect
+				  bit-3     : ACS P2P Completion Redirect
+				  bit-4     : ACS Upstream Forwarding
+				  bit-5     : ACS P2P Egress Control
+				  bit-6     : ACS Direct Translated P2P
+				  bit-7     : ACS I/O Request Blocking
+				  bit-9:8   : ACS DSP Memory Target Access Ctrl
+				      00    : Direct Request access enabled
+				      01    : Request blocking enabled
+				      10    : Request redirect enabled
+				      11    : Reserved
+				  bit-11:10 : ACS USP Memory Target Access Ctrl
+				              Same encoding as bit-9:8
+				  bit-12    : ACS Unclaimed Request Redirect Ctrl
 				Each bit can be marked as:
 				  '0' – force disabled
 				  '1' – force enabled
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 15440857ff35..08d45907d73e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -942,7 +942,10 @@ static void __pci_config_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_acs *caps,
 		}
 
 		if (mask & ~(PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_TB | PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR |
-			    PCI_ACS_UF | PCI_ACS_EC | PCI_ACS_DT)) {
+			    PCI_ACS_UF | PCI_ACS_EC | PCI_ACS_DT | PCI_ACS_IB |
+			    PCI_ACS_DMAC_RB | PCI_ACS_DMAC_RR |
+			    PCI_ACS_UMAC_RB | PCI_ACS_UMAC_RR |
+			    PCI_ACS_URRC)) {
 			pci_err(dev, "Invalid ACS flags specified\n");
 			return;
 		}
@@ -1002,6 +1005,14 @@ static void pci_std_enable_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_acs *caps)
 	/* Upstream Forwarding */
 	caps->ctrl |= (caps->cap & PCI_ACS_UF);
 
+	/*
+	 * Downstream and Upstream Port Memory Target Access Redirect,
+	 * Redirect Unclaimed Request Redirect Control
+	 */
+	if (caps->cap & PCI_ACS_ECAP)
+		caps->ctrl |= PCI_ACS_DMAC_RR | PCI_ACS_UMAC_RR |
+			      PCI_ACS_URRC | PCI_ACS_IB;
+
 	/* Enable Translation Blocking for external devices and noats */
 	if (pci_ats_disabled() || dev->external_facing || dev->untrusted)
 		caps->ctrl |= (caps->cap & PCI_ACS_TB);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
index ec1c54b5a310..593ef522d2ba 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
@@ -1016,6 +1016,7 @@
 
 /* Access Control Service */
 #define PCI_ACS_CAP		0x04	/* ACS Capability Register */
+#define  PCI_ACS_ECAP		0x0080  /* ACS Enhanced Capability */
 #define  PCI_ACS_SV		0x0001	/* Source Validation */
 #define  PCI_ACS_TB		0x0002	/* Translation Blocking */
 #define  PCI_ACS_RR		0x0004	/* P2P Request Redirect */
@@ -1023,6 +1024,12 @@
 #define  PCI_ACS_UF		0x0010	/* Upstream Forwarding */
 #define  PCI_ACS_EC		0x0020	/* P2P Egress Control */
 #define  PCI_ACS_DT		0x0040	/* Direct Translated P2P */
+#define  PCI_ACS_IB		0x0080	/* I/O Request Blocking */
+#define  PCI_ACS_DMAC_RB	0x0100  /* DSP Memory Target Access Blocking */
+#define  PCI_ACS_DMAC_RR	0x0200  /* DSP Memory Target Access Redirect */
+#define  PCI_ACS_UMAC_RB	0x0400  /* USP Memory Target Access Blocking */
+#define  PCI_ACS_UMAC_RR	0x0800  /* USP Memory Target Access Redirect */
+#define  PCI_ACS_URRC		0x1000	/* Unclaimed Request Redirect Ctrl */
 #define PCI_ACS_EGRESS_BITS	0x05	/* ACS Egress Control Vector Size */
 #define PCI_ACS_CTRL		0x06	/* ACS Control Register */
 #define PCI_ACS_EGRESS_CTL_V	0x08	/* ACS Egress Control Vector */
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: Add the enhanced ACS controls check to pci_acs_flags_enabled()
  2026-02-02 11:33 [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI: Add support for ACS Enhanced Capability Wei Wang
  2026-02-02 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: Enable the enhanced ACS controls introduced by PCI_ACS_ECAP Wei Wang
@ 2026-02-02 11:33 ` Wei Wang
  2026-02-02 16:03   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wei Wang @ 2026-02-02 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, jgg, akpm, bp, rdunlap, alex, kevin.tian
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-pci, wei.w.wang

The enhanced ACS controls introduced by PCIe Gen 5 ensures better device
isolation. On devices that support the PCI_ACS_ECAP capability, the
controls are required to be enabled properly:
- ACS I/O Request Blocking needs to be enabled to avoid unintended
  upstream I/O requests.
- ACS DSP and USP Memory Target Access Control needs to be set with
  Request Redirect or Request Blocking to ensure the Downstream and
  and Upstream Port memory resource ranges are not accessed by upstream
  memory requests.
- ACS Unclaimed Request Redirect needs to be enabled to ensure accesses to
  areas that lies within a Switch's Upstream Port memory apertures but not
  within any Downstream Port memory apertures get redirected.

To maintain compatibility with legacy devices that lack PCI_ACS_ECAP
support, pci_acs_enabled() skips checking for the capability.

Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@hotmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pci.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 08d45907d73e..6922a5ea5e46 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -3527,6 +3527,56 @@ void pci_configure_ari(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	}
 }
 
+static bool pci_dev_has_memory_bars(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i <= PCI_ROM_RESOURCE; i++) {
+		if (pci_resource_flags(pdev, i) & IORESOURCE_MEM)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static bool pci_acs_ecap_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 ctrl)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *usp_pdev = pci_upstream_bridge(pdev);
+	u16 mask = PCI_ACS_DMAC_RB | PCI_ACS_DMAC_RR;
+
+	/*
+	 * For ACS DSP/USP Memory Target Access Control, either Request
+	 * Redirect or Request Blocking must be enabled to enforce isolation.
+	 * According to PCIe spec 7.0, the DSP Memory Target Access is
+	 * applicable to both Root Ports and Switch Upstream Ports that have
+	 * applicable Memory BAR space to protect. So if the device does not
+	 * have a Memory BAR, it skips the check.
+	 */
+	if (pci_dev_has_memory_bars(pdev) &&
+	    (ctrl & mask) != PCI_ACS_DMAC_RB &&
+	    (ctrl & mask) != PCI_ACS_DMAC_RR)
+		return false;
+
+	mask = PCI_ACS_UMAC_RB | PCI_ACS_UMAC_RR;
+	/*
+	 * The USP Memory Target Access is only applicable to downstream ports
+	 * that have applicable Memory BAR space in the Switch Upstream Port to
+	 * protect. Root Ports, which have usp_pdev set to NULL, will skip the
+	 * check.
+	 */
+	if (usp_pdev && pci_dev_has_memory_bars(usp_pdev) &&
+	    (ctrl & mask) != PCI_ACS_UMAC_RB &&
+	    (ctrl & mask) != PCI_ACS_UMAC_RR)
+		return false;
+
+	/* PCI_ACS_URRC is applicable to Downstream Ports only.  */
+	if (usp_pdev && !(ctrl & PCI_ACS_URRC))
+		return false;
+
+	/* PCI_ACS_IB is applicable to both Root and Downstream Ports. */
+	return !!(ctrl & PCI_ACS_IB);
+}
+
 static bool pci_acs_flags_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 acs_flags)
 {
 	int pos;
@@ -3545,6 +3595,19 @@ static bool pci_acs_flags_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 acs_flags)
 	acs_flags &= (cap | PCI_ACS_EC);
 
 	pci_read_config_word(pdev, pos + PCI_ACS_CTRL, &ctrl);
+
+	if (acs_flags & PCI_ACS_ECAP) {
+		if ((cap & PCI_ACS_ECAP) && !pci_acs_ecap_enabled(pdev, ctrl))
+			return false;
+
+		/*
+		 * The check for the required controls in PCI_ACS_ECAP has
+		 * passed. Clear the ECAP flag and continue to check the
+		 * basic ACS controls.
+		 */
+		acs_flags &= ~PCI_ACS_ECAP;
+	}
+
 	return (ctrl & acs_flags) == acs_flags;
 }
 
@@ -3603,6 +3666,8 @@ bool pci_acs_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 acs_flags)
 	 */
 	case PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM:
 	case PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT:
+		/* PCI_ACS_ECAP applies to Root and Downstream Ports only */
+		acs_flags |= PCI_ACS_ECAP;
 		return pci_acs_flags_enabled(pdev, acs_flags);
 	/*
 	 * PCIe 3.0, 6.12.1.2 specifies ACS capabilities that should be
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: Enable the enhanced ACS controls introduced by PCI_ACS_ECAP
  2026-02-02 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: Enable the enhanced ACS controls introduced by PCI_ACS_ECAP Wei Wang
@ 2026-02-02 16:02   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2026-02-02 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wei Wang
  Cc: bhelgaas, akpm, bp, rdunlap, alex, kevin.tian, linux-kernel,
	linux-pci

On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 07:33:34PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> The ACS Enhanced Capability introduces several new access controls to
> improve device isolation. These new controls are particularly important
> for device passthrough in virtualization scenarios.
> 
> For example, a DMA transaction from a device may target a guest physical
> address that lies within the memory aperture of the switch's upstream
> port, but not within any memory aperture or BAR space of a downstream
> port. In such cases, the switch would generate an Unsupported Request (UR)
> response to the device, which is undesirable. Enabling Unclaimed Request
> Redirect Control ensures that these DMA requests are forwarded upstream
> instead of being rejected.
> 
> The ACS DSP and USP Memory Target Access Control and ACS I/O Request
> Blocking features similarly enhance device isolation. Device grouping in
> Linux assumes that devices are properly isolated. Therefore, enable these
> controls by default if PCI_ACS_ECAP is supported by the hardware. As with
> other basic ACS access controls, these new controls can be configured via
> the config_acs= boot parameter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@hotmail.com>
> ---
>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         | 23 +++++++++++++------
>  drivers/pci/pci.c                             | 13 ++++++++++-
>  include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h                 |  7 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: Add the enhanced ACS controls check to pci_acs_flags_enabled()
  2026-02-02 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: Add the enhanced ACS controls check to pci_acs_flags_enabled() Wei Wang
@ 2026-02-02 16:03   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2026-02-03  9:59     ` Wei Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2026-02-02 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wei Wang
  Cc: bhelgaas, akpm, bp, rdunlap, alex, kevin.tian, linux-kernel,
	linux-pci

On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 07:33:35PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> +static bool pci_acs_ecap_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 ctrl)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *usp_pdev = pci_upstream_bridge(pdev);
> +	u16 mask = PCI_ACS_DMAC_RB | PCI_ACS_DMAC_RR;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * For ACS DSP/USP Memory Target Access Control, either Request
> +	 * Redirect or Request Blocking must be enabled to enforce isolation.
> +	 * According to PCIe spec 7.0, the DSP Memory Target Access is
> +	 * applicable to both Root Ports and Switch Upstream Ports that have
> +	 * applicable Memory BAR space to protect. So if the device does not
> +	 * have a Memory BAR, it skips the check.
> +	 */
> +	if (pci_dev_has_memory_bars(pdev) &&
> +	    (ctrl & mask) != PCI_ACS_DMAC_RB &&
> +	    (ctrl & mask) != PCI_ACS_DMAC_RR)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	mask = PCI_ACS_UMAC_RB | PCI_ACS_UMAC_RR;
> +	/*
> +	 * The USP Memory Target Access is only applicable to downstream ports
> +	 * that have applicable Memory BAR space in the Switch Upstream Port to
> +	 * protect. Root Ports, which have usp_pdev set to NULL, will skip the
> +	 * check.
> +	 */
> +	if (usp_pdev && pci_dev_has_memory_bars(usp_pdev) &&
> +	    (ctrl & mask) != PCI_ACS_UMAC_RB &&
> +	    (ctrl & mask) != PCI_ACS_UMAC_RR)
> +		return false;

I'm not sure about using this logic to detect a USP, it would be
better to drive it off PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM

Everything else looks OK though

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: Add the enhanced ACS controls check to pci_acs_flags_enabled()
  2026-02-02 16:03   ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2026-02-03  9:59     ` Wei Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wei Wang @ 2026-02-03  9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Gunthorpe
  Cc: bhelgaas, akpm, bp, rdunlap, alex, kevin.tian, linux-kernel,
	linux-pci



On 2/3/26 12:03 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 07:33:35PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
>> +static bool pci_acs_ecap_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	struct pci_dev *usp_pdev = pci_upstream_bridge(pdev);
>> +	u16 mask = PCI_ACS_DMAC_RB | PCI_ACS_DMAC_RR;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * For ACS DSP/USP Memory Target Access Control, either Request
>> +	 * Redirect or Request Blocking must be enabled to enforce isolation.
>> +	 * According to PCIe spec 7.0, the DSP Memory Target Access is
>> +	 * applicable to both Root Ports and Switch Upstream Ports that have
>> +	 * applicable Memory BAR space to protect. So if the device does not
>> +	 * have a Memory BAR, it skips the check.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (pci_dev_has_memory_bars(pdev) &&
>> +	    (ctrl & mask) != PCI_ACS_DMAC_RB &&
>> +	    (ctrl & mask) != PCI_ACS_DMAC_RR)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	mask = PCI_ACS_UMAC_RB | PCI_ACS_UMAC_RR;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * The USP Memory Target Access is only applicable to downstream ports
>> +	 * that have applicable Memory BAR space in the Switch Upstream Port to
>> +	 * protect. Root Ports, which have usp_pdev set to NULL, will skip the
>> +	 * check.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (usp_pdev && pci_dev_has_memory_bars(usp_pdev) &&
>> +	    (ctrl & mask) != PCI_ACS_UMAC_RB &&
>> +	    (ctrl & mask) != PCI_ACS_UMAC_RR)
>> +		return false;
> 
> I'm not sure about using this logic to detect a USP, it would be
> better to drive it off PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM

Right. My thought was that only Root Ports and Downstream Ports reach 
this path, and only Downstream Ports have a valid usp_pdev, so it worked 
as an implicit DSP check.

Using the pcie type directly seems clearer. I’ll add:
bool is_dsp = pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM;


> 
> Everything else looks OK though
> 
> Jason


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-03 10:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-02 11:33 [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI: Add support for ACS Enhanced Capability Wei Wang
2026-02-02 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: Enable the enhanced ACS controls introduced by PCI_ACS_ECAP Wei Wang
2026-02-02 16:02   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-02 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: Add the enhanced ACS controls check to pci_acs_flags_enabled() Wei Wang
2026-02-02 16:03   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-03  9:59     ` Wei Wang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox