From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Cheng Li" <lechain@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 next 03/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Add buffering to vfprintf() callback.
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2026 23:36:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260207233651.577f0fcb@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYeSnohSJ78ADFUZ@1wt.eu>
On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 20:29:34 +0100
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 07:11:13PM +0000, david.laight.linux@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> >
> > Add per-call buffering to the vprintf() callback.
> > While this adds some extra code it will speed things up and
> > makes a massive difference to anyone looking at strace output.
>
> This patch alone adds more than 200 extra bytes to the smallest binary
> for something that was never expressed as a need by users:
>
> $ size hello-patch*
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 1859 48 24 1931 78b hello-patch1
> 2071 48 24 2143 85f hello-patch2
>
> I doubt it would make sense to have a build option to choose this.
> Or alternately one could decide do disable it when __OPTIMIZE_SIZE__
> is defined. I just tried quickly and it does the job:
That probably makes sense.
For anything non-trivial the extra size is noise.
Actually is would be easier to read with a single #if covering the
whole lot.
>
> @@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ struct __nolibc_fprintf_cb_state {
>
> static int __nolibc_fprintf_cb(void *v_state, const char *buf, size_t size)
> {
> +#if !defined(__OPTIMIZE_SIZE__)
> struct __nolibc_fprintf_cb_state *state = v_state;
> unsigned int off = state->buf_offset;
>
> @@ -407,16 +408,24 @@ static int __nolibc_fprintf_cb(void *v_state, const char *buf, size_t size)
> memcpy(state->buf + off, buf, size);
> }
> return 0;
> +#else
> + /* v_state is the stream */
> + return size ? _fwrite(buf, size, v_state) : 0;
> +#endif
> }
>
> static __attribute__((unused, format(printf, 2, 0)))
> int vfprintf(FILE *stream, const char *fmt, va_list args)
> {
> +#if !defined(__OPTIMIZE_SIZE__)
> struct __nolibc_fprintf_cb_state state;
>
> state.stream = stream;
> state.buf_offset = 0;
> return __nolibc_printf(__nolibc_fprintf_cb, &state, fmt, args);
> +#else
> + return __nolibc_printf(__nolibc_fprintf_cb, stream, fmt, args);
> +#endif
> }
>
> static __attribute__((unused, format(printf, 1, 0)))
>
> > Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes for v2:
> > Formally patch 2, unchanged.
> >
> > tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h b/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h
> > index 36733ecd4261..552f09d51d82 100644
> > --- a/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h
> > +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h
> > @@ -382,15 +382,41 @@ int __nolibc_printf(__nolibc_printf_cb cb, void *state, const char *fmt, va_list
> > return written;
> > }
> >
> > -static int __nolibc_fprintf_cb(void *stream, const char *buf, size_t size)
> > +struct __nolibc_fprintf_cb_state {
> > + FILE *stream;
> > + unsigned int buf_offset;
> > + char buf[128];
> > +};
>
> So that's the other state I was wondering if we could merge with the first
> one.
The snprintf state is the 'address to write the next character to'
and 'the amount of space remaining'.
No real overlap at all.
>
> > +static int __nolibc_fprintf_cb(void *v_state, const char *buf, size_t size)
> > {
> > - return size ? _fwrite(buf, size, stream) : 0;
> > + struct __nolibc_fprintf_cb_state *state = v_state;
> > + unsigned int off = state->buf_offset;
> > +
> > + if (off + size > sizeof(state->buf) || buf == NULL) {
>
> Please mention that special case of buf==NULL in a comment above the
> function. That's an internal API choice.
ok - it might just go above this line though.
David
>
> > + state->buf_offset = 0;
> > + if (off && _fwrite(state->buf, off, state->stream))
> > + return -1;
> > + if (size > sizeof(state->buf))
> > + return _fwrite(buf, size, state->stream);
> > + off = 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (size) {
> > + state->buf_offset = off + size;
> > + memcpy(state->buf + off, buf, size);
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static __attribute__((unused, format(printf, 2, 0)))
> > int vfprintf(FILE *stream, const char *fmt, va_list args)
> > {
> > - return __nolibc_printf(__nolibc_fprintf_cb, stream, fmt, args);
> > + struct __nolibc_fprintf_cb_state state;
> > +
> > + state.stream = stream;
> > + state.buf_offset = 0;
> > + return __nolibc_printf(__nolibc_fprintf_cb, &state, fmt, args);
> > }
> >
> > static __attribute__((unused, format(printf, 1, 0)))
>
> Thanks,
> Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-07 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-06 19:11 [PATCH v2 next 00/11] tools/nolibc: Enhance printf() david.laight.linux
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 01/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Change variable used for format chars from 'c' to 'ch' david.laight.linux
2026-02-07 18:51 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-16 18:52 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 02/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Move snprintf length check to callback david.laight.linux
2026-02-07 19:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-07 23:28 ` David Laight
2026-02-08 15:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-08 22:49 ` David Laight
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 03/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Add buffering to vfprintf() callback david.laight.linux
2026-02-07 19:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-07 23:36 ` David Laight [this message]
2026-02-16 19:07 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-17 11:51 ` David Laight
2026-02-18 17:52 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 04/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Output pad characters in 16 byte chunks david.laight.linux
2026-02-07 19:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-07 23:43 ` David Laight
2026-02-08 15:14 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-16 19:30 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 22:29 ` David Laight
2026-02-18 17:30 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 05/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Simplify __nolibc_printf() david.laight.linux
2026-02-07 20:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-07 23:50 ` David Laight
2026-02-08 12:20 ` David Laight
2026-02-08 14:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-08 16:54 ` David Laight
2026-02-08 17:06 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 06/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Use bit-masks to hold requested flag, length and conversion chars david.laight.linux
2026-02-08 15:22 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-16 19:52 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 22:47 ` David Laight
2026-02-18 17:36 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-18 22:57 ` David Laight
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 07/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Add support for conversion flags "#- +" and format "%X" david.laight.linux
2026-02-08 15:47 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-08 17:14 ` David Laight
2026-02-08 16:06 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-16 19:57 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 22:50 ` David Laight
2026-02-18 17:39 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 20:11 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 22:52 ` David Laight
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 08/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Add support for zero padding and field precision david.laight.linux
2026-02-08 16:16 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-08 17:31 ` David Laight
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 09/11] selftests/nolibc: Improve reporting of vfprintf() errors david.laight.linux
2026-02-16 20:05 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-17 10:48 ` David Laight
2026-02-18 17:48 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 10/11] selftests/nolibc: Increase coverage of printf format tests david.laight.linux
2026-02-16 20:14 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 20:23 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 22:54 ` David Laight
2026-02-18 17:41 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 11/11] selftests/nolibc: Use printf("%.*s", n, "") to align output david.laight.linux
2026-02-08 16:20 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-16 20:22 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-06 21:36 ` [PATCH v2 next 00/11] tools/nolibc: Enhance printf() David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260207233651.577f0fcb@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=lechain@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox