* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-09 14:23 [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2026-02-09 18:15 ` Francesco Dolcini
2026-02-09 18:16 ` Brett A C Sheffield
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Francesco Dolcini @ 2026-02-09 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 03:23:23PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.124 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Compiled and tested on
- Verdin iMX8MM
- Colibri iMX6
- Apalis iMX6
- Colibri iMX6ULL
- Colibri iMX7
Tested-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-09 14:23 [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-02-09 18:15 ` Francesco Dolcini
@ 2026-02-09 18:16 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2026-02-09 20:55 ` Jon Hunter
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Brett A C Sheffield @ 2026-02-09 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr,
Brett A C Sheffield
# Librecast Test Results
020/020 [ OK ] liblcrq
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
120/120 [ OK ] liblibrecast
CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 6.6.124-rc1-gb4030a6c83e3 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Feb 9 18:00:40 -00 2026 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-09 14:23 [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-02-09 18:15 ` Francesco Dolcini
2026-02-09 18:16 ` Brett A C Sheffield
@ 2026-02-09 20:55 ` Jon Hunter
2026-02-09 21:39 ` Peter Schneider
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2026-02-09 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr,
linux-tegra, stable
On Mon, 09 Feb 2026 15:23:23 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.124 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:22:44 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.124-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.6:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
133 tests: 133 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.6.124-rc1-gb4030a6c83e3
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-09 14:23 [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-09 20:55 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2026-02-09 21:39 ` Peter Schneider
2026-02-09 22:59 ` Florian Fainelli
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2026-02-09 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
Am 09.02.2026 um 15:23 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.124 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-09 14:23 [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-09 21:39 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2026-02-09 22:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2026-02-10 7:58 ` Ron Economos
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2026-02-09 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor,
hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On 2/9/2026 6:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.124 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:22:44 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.124-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-09 14:23 [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-09 22:59 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2026-02-10 7:58 ` Ron Economos
2026-02-10 13:08 ` Mark Brown
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2026-02-10 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On 2/9/26 06:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.124 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:22:44 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.124-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-09 14:23 [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-10 7:58 ` Ron Economos
@ 2026-02-10 13:08 ` Mark Brown
2026-02-11 0:52 ` Wang Yugui
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2026-02-10 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, achill, sr
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 03:23:23PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.124 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-09 14:23 [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-10 13:08 ` Mark Brown
@ 2026-02-11 0:52 ` Wang Yugui
2026-02-11 3:06 ` Wang Yugui
2026-02-11 4:26 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Wang Yugui @ 2026-02-11 0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
Hi,
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.124 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:22:44 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.124-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
6.6.123 boot well, but 6.6.124-rc1 failed to boot here.
error message:
dracut: fatal: iscsiroot requested but kernel/initrd does not support iscsi.
'git bisect' yet not done, and report this problem firstly.
Best Regards
Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com)
2026/02/11
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-11 0:52 ` Wang Yugui
@ 2026-02-11 3:06 ` Wang Yugui
2026-02-11 12:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Wang Yugui @ 2026-02-11 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
Hi,
> Hi,
>
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.124 release.
> > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:22:44 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.124-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> 6.6.123 boot well, but 6.6.124-rc1 failed to boot here.
>
> error message:
> dracut: fatal: iscsiroot requested but kernel/initrd does not support iscsi.
>
> 'git bisect' yet not done, and report this problem firstly.
6.6.124-rc1 without 'x86-kfence-fix-booting-on-32bit-non-pae-systems.patch' (revert),
boot well here.
but 6.1.163-rc1 with 'x86-kfence-fix-booting-on-32bit-non-pae-systems.patch'
boot well.
Best Regards
Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com)
2026/02/11
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-11 3:06 ` Wang Yugui
@ 2026-02-11 12:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-02-11 12:50 ` Wang Yugui
2026-02-21 1:34 ` Wang Yugui
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2026-02-11 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wang Yugui
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 11:06:21AM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.124 release.
> > > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:22:44 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.124-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > 6.6.123 boot well, but 6.6.124-rc1 failed to boot here.
> >
> > error message:
> > dracut: fatal: iscsiroot requested but kernel/initrd does not support iscsi.
> >
> > 'git bisect' yet not done, and report this problem firstly.
>
> 6.6.124-rc1 without 'x86-kfence-fix-booting-on-32bit-non-pae-systems.patch' (revert),
> boot well here.
>
> but 6.1.163-rc1 with 'x86-kfence-fix-booting-on-32bit-non-pae-systems.patch'
> boot well.
Does 6.19 work properly on this hardware too?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-11 12:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2026-02-11 12:50 ` Wang Yugui
2026-02-21 1:34 ` Wang Yugui
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Wang Yugui @ 2026-02-11 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Andrew Cooper
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
Hi,
# add Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 11:06:21AM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.124 release.
> > > > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:22:44 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.124-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > 6.6.123 boot well, but 6.6.124-rc1 failed to boot here.
> > >
> > > error message:
> > > dracut: fatal: iscsiroot requested but kernel/initrd does not support iscsi.
> > >
> > > 'git bisect' yet not done, and report this problem firstly.
> >
> > 6.6.124-rc1 without 'x86-kfence-fix-booting-on-32bit-non-pae-systems.patch' (revert),
> > boot well here.
> >
> > but 6.1.163-rc1 with 'x86-kfence-fix-booting-on-32bit-non-pae-systems.patch'
> > boot well.
>
> Does 6.19 work properly on this hardware too?
both
6.12.70-rc1 with 'x86-kfence-fix-booting-on-32bit-non-pae-systems.patch'
and
6.18.10-rc1with 'x86-kfence-fix-booting-on-32bit-non-pae-systems.patch'
works well on this hardware too.
And CONFIG_KFENCE=y is defined for this test of 6.1/6.6/6.12/6.18.
There is no test result of 6.19.
Best Regards
Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com)
2026/02/11
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-11 12:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-02-11 12:50 ` Wang Yugui
@ 2026-02-21 1:34 ` Wang Yugui
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Wang Yugui @ 2026-02-21 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Andrew Cooper
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
Hi,
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 11:06:21AM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.124 release.
> > > > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:22:44 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.124-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > 6.6.123 boot well, but 6.6.124-rc1 failed to boot here.
> > >
> > > error message:
> > > dracut: fatal: iscsiroot requested but kernel/initrd does not support iscsi.
> > >
> > > 'git bisect' yet not done, and report this problem firstly.
> >
> > 6.6.124-rc1 without 'x86-kfence-fix-booting-on-32bit-non-pae-systems.patch' (revert),
> > boot well here.
> >
> > but 6.1.163-rc1 with 'x86-kfence-fix-booting-on-32bit-non-pae-systems.patch'
> > boot well.
>
> Does 6.19 work properly on this hardware too?
>
6.6.127 boot well on this hardware again.
so this regression is fixed at least in 6.6.127.
Best Regards
Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com)
2026/02/21
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-09 14:23 [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-11 0:52 ` Wang Yugui
@ 2026-02-11 4:26 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2026-02-11 10:23 ` Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
2026-02-11 13:44 ` Miguel Ojeda
10 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Shung-Hsi Yu @ 2026-02-11 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 03:23:23PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.124 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
test_progs, test_progs-no_alu32, test_progs-cpuv4, test_maps,
test_verifier in BPF selftests all passes[1] on x86_64.
Tested-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
1: https://github.com/shunghsiyu/libbpf/actions/runs/21880634049/job/63161819172
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-09 14:23 [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-11 4:26 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
@ 2026-02-11 10:23 ` Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
2026-02-11 13:44 ` Miguel Ojeda
10 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrin Thalakkottoor @ 2026-02-11 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
hello,
No typical dmesg regressions
Tested-by: Jeffrin Jose T <jeffrin@rajagiritech.edu.in>
--
software engineer
rajagiri school of engineering and technology
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review
2026-02-09 14:23 [PATCH 6.6 00/86] 6.6.124-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-11 10:23 ` Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
@ 2026-02-11 13:44 ` Miguel Ojeda
10 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2026-02-11 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: achill, akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh,
linux-kernel, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel,
rwarsow, shuah, sr, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds,
Miguel Ojeda
On Mon, 09 Feb 2026 15:23:23 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.124 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:22:44 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64:
Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread