From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A64A131B825; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 12:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770640559; cv=none; b=HZO+ABIxw67KIrz+ezT8vRKo5qj9Ff8bMjexMcNBKfGauEET3ytCs/525HxP5ZVkyRspsaTY+qyxK+t6Ah2lNJsP6CrNVXRBqHjjRJzrZGO5Iuz6K528ApS3mBTiKV0mMTYdMyE8jSaMX4j+Gty5fl4jp1MZbD0bA2GYYEfvg74= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770640559; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vVLeOPjW6ll7Le/2DvrhGjKfqYcIym2yM/3KsxHbPJI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SEWr9veTzMgFyQ+aQZvgsYLXQ2FwgxMJQMqXsgK7ytgoX067qROtzCAKe92iFbqXfu8L88VXHJ0W3AQwOmsUXcupukeDGLqx+85QYDk8NgtXpSxSGArY4AHHc3wpdH7/o5KdXuZfKhfDYdXowvn+oxBty9lo/dL6DBb+0yEe3sA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=WSopEz7Z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="WSopEz7Z" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF123C116C6; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 12:35:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1770640559; bh=vVLeOPjW6ll7Le/2DvrhGjKfqYcIym2yM/3KsxHbPJI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WSopEz7ZjcIXbcsaGToiAQvnsIgt6zpIbBLKpGXj6L9s0IaZVpuQnNgNLyOlpRlCL A2NVDy2imHXQYvvHxUkRac9vkizkfJ0NYozMB6QAmEr9WiQ47R0QD7LOaCxSh9KDeo ErjgnU6iHrbzKBCwIa6kZ1RzLTmDDkbKGmCbIwu8= Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 13:35:56 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Ethan Lam Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ignacio.pena87@gmail.com, bryant.boatright@proton.me, strnad.jj@gmail.com, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: replace msleep with usleep_range Message-ID: <2026020944-mummified-scope-4221@gregkh> References: <20260209120709.29824-1-ethanlxkernel@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260209120709.29824-1-ethanlxkernel@gmail.com> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 08:07:09PM +0800, Ethan Lam wrote: > checkpatch.pl says that msleep < 20ms can sleep for longer than expected. > The documentation says we should "Use uslee_range*() > whenever accuracy of *sleep() is not sufficient) > > Replaced msleep(10) with usleep_range(10000, 11000) so the delay > is more accurate and percise > > Signed-off-by: Ethan Lam > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c > index ef2d92b5588a..97c923015279 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c > @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ void _rtw_free_evt_priv(struct evt_priv *pevtpriv) > { > _cancel_workitem_sync(&pevtpriv->c2h_wk); > while (pevtpriv->c2h_wk_alive) > - msleep(10); > + usleep_range(10000, 11000); > > while (!rtw_cbuf_empty(pevtpriv->c2h_queue)) { > void *c2h = rtw_cbuf_pop(pevtpriv->c2h_queue); > -- > 2.43.0 > > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - You sent a patch that has been sent multiple times in the past few days, and is identical to ones that has been recently rejected. Please always look at the mailing list traffic to determine if you are duplicating other people's work. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot