Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] nvmet: Rapid Path Failure Recovery set controller identify fields

Sagi Grimberg
2026-02-07T13:41:33Z

> Precisely my point. If CQT defaults to zero no delay will be inserted,
> but we _still_ have CCR handling. Just proving that both really are
> independent on each other. Hence I would prefer to have two patchsets.

Agreed. I think it would be cleaner to review each separately. the CCR
can be based
on top of the CQT patchset, for simplicity.