From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C9E123183B for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770997725; cv=none; b=gk6jw/TkRDm2Mv52KHoP20AR9cABC12Kc3YgFEKRat5GZXitOLXRdqxG75uMxi2AO8lXUbYld20Qn0NAxAOn8zJpoJpjU/6ZBHEntOVaNFULGjnNhHzf9u4SNyXBX9JxbArGx+f3kXR5KBUHFWR2emwpbAF7HkOL7ZyyBr4Miv8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770997725; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7dPdpuhsrQod7cEGqKBOY+A3ayeNPxUOOxb86J+eqNA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=RcK6eDLYIYyY282SAQ+hRiSTUOG917/iVtQzZky7foLlm3yq7ByBKnzmPw2OlzWuDmBXrLNZyn+4MqSGPj+lK6fxBdKmA6SHyRaBVAWYPHIxZ8QCN0/GxgeqGkZv4KUW/DEFqeVnZCwS1r1XVU2mTgFJqI2Wlw7ulR8l0av3gYM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WHbMe4ts; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WHbMe4ts" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4B29C19424 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:48:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770997725; bh=7dPdpuhsrQod7cEGqKBOY+A3ayeNPxUOOxb86J+eqNA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WHbMe4tsgtS4AB8kNPkasw4v4lIQx2jJiY4rmeA074j6L8cF3+MZQ4D51RAcKGB43 4YTjW61e3GFaBQOzYm2xXqtQtpaurWHtziQp8VyBgYcMVGPABU7oY2rzUqLCu5ER07 Wa4ClhCwTpRiKNhrBmIOljHVeeCDPYCVvS/A9R+afBGRyhi1v/uyBmk2U82Nc9o9Fs qrQvn3KlaU3mV+SLsBL0JkV56mdYzxgg6U8rILsBe+kUuZUESqy3yEuO1K1DvvqsXD xlo9CpXhJsSOMjPpoHROtxuMG06ANGKtIOFhqK2yD9B2cQ06Ss3tgvIjk665+gZ3Rj QP1w4MCwP+xFQ== Received: from phl-compute-06.internal (phl-compute-06.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfauth.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C048F40069; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 10:48:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-06.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 13 Feb 2026 10:48:44 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgddvtdekieehucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefufffkofgjfhgggfestdekredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepfdfmihhrhihl ucfuhhhuthhsvghmrghuucdlofgvthgrmddfuceokhgrsheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefhudejfedvgeekffefvdekheekkeeuveeftdelheegteel gfefveevueekhfdtteenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehkihhrihhllhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidq udeiudduiedvieehhedqvdekgeeggeejvdekqdhkrghspeepkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgse hshhhuthgvmhhovhdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeduvddpmhhouggvpehsmhht phhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoheprghruggssehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhope htghhlgieskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepmhhinhhgohesrhgvughhrght rdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepsghpsegrlhhivghnkedruggvpdhrtghpthhtohepuggrvh gvrdhhrghnshgvnheslhhinhhugidrihhnthgvlhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehthhho mhgrshdrlhgvnhgurggtkhihsegrmhgurdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepgiekieeskhgvrh hnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqvghfihesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgv lhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhigqdhmmheskhhvrggtkhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i10464835:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 10:48:43 -0500 (EST) From: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" To: Ard Biesheuvel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Tom Lendacky Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Moritz Sanft , "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" Subject: [PATCH 2/2] efi: Align unaccepted memory range to page boundary Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:48:38 +0000 Message-ID: <20260213154838.46567-3-kas@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.2 In-Reply-To: <20260213154838.46567-1-kas@kernel.org> References: <20260213154838.46567-1-kas@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The accept_memory() and range_contains_unaccepted_memory() functions employ a "guard page" logic to prevent crashes with load_unaligned_zeropad(). This logic extends the range to be accepted (or checked) by one unit_size if the end of the range is aligned to a unit_size boundary. However, if the caller passes a range that is not page-aligned, the 'end' of the range might not be numerically aligned to unit_size, even if it covers the last page of a unit. This causes the "if (!(end % unit_size))" check to fail, skipping the necessary extension and leaving the next unit unaccepted, which can lead to a kernel panic when accessed by load_unaligned_zeropad(). Align the start address down and the size up to the nearest page boundary before performing the unit_size alignment check. This ensures that the guard unit is correctly added when the range effectively ends on a unit boundary. Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) --- drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c index c2c067eff634..9ddf3dedd514 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c @@ -35,14 +35,18 @@ void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size) struct efi_unaccepted_memory *unaccepted; unsigned long range_start, range_end; struct accept_range range, *entry; - phys_addr_t end = start + size; unsigned long flags; + phys_addr_t end; u64 unit_size; unaccepted = efi_get_unaccepted_table(); if (!unaccepted) return; + start = PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(start); + size = PAGE_ALIGN(size); + end = start + size; + unit_size = unaccepted->unit_size; /* @@ -160,15 +164,19 @@ void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size) bool range_contains_unaccepted_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size) { struct efi_unaccepted_memory *unaccepted; - phys_addr_t end = start + size; unsigned long flags; bool ret = false; + phys_addr_t end; u64 unit_size; unaccepted = efi_get_unaccepted_table(); if (!unaccepted) return false; + start = PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(start); + size = PAGE_ALIGN(size); + end = start + size; + unit_size = unaccepted->unit_size; /* -- 2.51.2