* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review
2026-02-17 20:31 [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2026-02-17 22:11 ` Florian Fainelli
2026-02-18 3:42 ` Woody Suwalski
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2026-02-17 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor,
hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On 2/17/26 12:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.251 release.
> There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Feb 2026 19:59:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.251-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review
2026-02-17 20:31 [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-02-17 22:11 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2026-02-18 3:42 ` Woody Suwalski
2026-02-18 8:22 ` Jon Hunter
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Woody Suwalski @ 2026-02-18 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.251 release.
> There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
Builds with custom .config and boots OK on an i386 machine. No dmesg
issues noticed.
Tested-by: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review
2026-02-17 20:31 [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-02-17 22:11 ` Florian Fainelli
2026-02-18 3:42 ` Woody Suwalski
@ 2026-02-18 8:22 ` Jon Hunter
2026-02-18 9:08 ` Brett A C Sheffield
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2026-02-18 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr,
linux-tegra, stable
On Tue, 17 Feb 2026 21:31:13 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.251 release.
> There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Feb 2026 19:59:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.251-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
80 tests: 80 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.251-rc1-g25b86d4e088d
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review
2026-02-17 20:31 [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-18 8:22 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2026-02-18 9:08 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2026-02-18 9:12 ` Pavel Machek
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Brett A C Sheffield @ 2026-02-18 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr,
Brett A C Sheffield
# Librecast Test Results
020/020 [ OK ] liblcrq
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
120/120 [ OK ] liblibrecast
CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 5.10.251-rc1-00025-g25b86d4e088d #1 SMP Wed Feb 18 08:17:34 -00 2026 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review
2026-02-17 20:31 [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-18 9:08 ` Brett A C Sheffield
@ 2026-02-18 9:12 ` Pavel Machek
2026-02-18 12:01 ` Mark Brown
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2026-02-18 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 552 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.251 release.
> There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@nabladev.com>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
In cooperation with Nabla.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review
2026-02-17 20:31 [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-18 9:12 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2026-02-18 12:01 ` Mark Brown
2026-02-19 0:44 ` Barry K. Nathan
2026-02-19 2:11 ` Dominique Martinet
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2026-02-18 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, achill, sr
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 346 bytes --]
On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 09:31:13PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.251 release.
> There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review
2026-02-17 20:31 [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-18 12:01 ` Mark Brown
@ 2026-02-19 0:44 ` Barry K. Nathan
2026-02-19 2:11 ` Dominique Martinet
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Barry K. Nathan @ 2026-02-19 0:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On 2/17/26 12:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.251 release.
> There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Feb 2026 19:59:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.251-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested on an amd64 laptop (Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 1). Working well, no
regressions observed.
Tested-by: Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>
--
-Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review
2026-02-17 20:31 [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.251-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-19 0:44 ` Barry K. Nathan
@ 2026-02-19 2:11 ` Dominique Martinet
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dominique Martinet @ 2026-02-19 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 09:31:13PM +0100:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.251 release.
> There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Feb 2026 19:59:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.251-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Tested 25b86d4e088d ("Linux 5.10.251-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)
No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
--
Dominique Martinet
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread