From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>,
Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>,
Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add tests for 64-bit bitops kfuncs
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 22:29:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260219142933.13904-5-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219142933.13904-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Add selftests for bpf_clz64(), bpf_ctz64(), bpf_ffs64(), bpf_fls64(),
bpf_bitrev64(), bpf_popcnt64(), bpf_rol64(), and bpf_ror64().
Each subtest compares kfunc results against a userspace reference
implementation over a set of test vectors.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h | 9 +
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bitops.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bitops.c | 68 +++++++
3 files changed, 259 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bitops.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bitops.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
index 9df77e59d4f5..02a985ef71cc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
@@ -594,6 +594,15 @@ extern void bpf_iter_dmabuf_destroy(struct bpf_iter_dmabuf *it) __weak __ksym;
extern int bpf_cgroup_read_xattr(struct cgroup *cgroup, const char *name__str,
struct bpf_dynptr *value_p) __weak __ksym;
+extern __u64 bpf_clz64(__u64 x) __weak __ksym;
+extern __u64 bpf_ctz64(__u64 x) __weak __ksym;
+extern __u64 bpf_ffs64(__u64 x) __weak __ksym;
+extern __u64 bpf_fls64(__u64 x) __weak __ksym;
+extern __u64 bpf_bitrev64(__u64 x) __weak __ksym;
+extern __u64 bpf_popcnt64(__u64 x) __weak __ksym;
+extern __u64 bpf_rol64(__u64 x, __u64 s) __weak __ksym;
+extern __u64 bpf_ror64(__u64 x, __u64 s) __weak __ksym;
+
#define PREEMPT_BITS 8
#define SOFTIRQ_BITS 8
#define HARDIRQ_BITS 4
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bitops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bitops.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9acc3cb1908c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bitops.c
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "bitops.skel.h"
+
+struct bitops_case {
+ __u64 x;
+ __u64 s;
+ __u64 exp;
+};
+
+static struct bitops_case cases[] = {
+ { 0x0ULL, 0, 0 },
+ { 0x1ULL, 1, 0 },
+ { 0x8000000000000000ULL, 63, 0 },
+ { 0xffffffffffffffffULL, 64, 0 },
+ { 0x0123456789abcdefULL, 65, 0 },
+ { 0x0000000100000000ULL, 127, 0 },
+};
+
+static __u64 clz64(__u64 x, __u64 s)
+{
+ (void)s;
+ return x ? __builtin_clzll(x) : 64;
+}
+
+static __u64 ctz64(__u64 x, __u64 s)
+{
+ (void)s;
+ return x ? __builtin_ctzll(x) : 64;
+}
+
+static __u64 ffs64(__u64 x, __u64 s)
+{
+ (void)s;
+ return x ? (__u64)__builtin_ctzll(x) + 1 : 0;
+}
+
+static __u64 fls64(__u64 x, __u64 s)
+{
+ (void)s;
+ return x ? 64 - __builtin_clzll(x) : 0;
+}
+
+static __u64 popcnt64(__u64 x, __u64 s)
+{
+ (void)s;
+ return __builtin_popcountll(x);
+}
+
+static __u64 bitrev64(__u64 x, __u64 s)
+{
+ __u64 y = 0;
+ int i;
+
+ (void)s;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
+ y <<= 1;
+ y |= x & 1;
+ x >>= 1;
+ }
+ return y;
+}
+
+static __u64 rol64(__u64 x, __u64 s)
+{
+ s &= 63;
+ return (x << s) | (x >> ((-s) & 63));
+}
+
+static __u64 ror64(__u64 x, __u64 s)
+{
+ s &= 63;
+ return (x >> s) | (x << ((-s) & 63));
+}
+
+static void test_bitops_case(const char *prog_name)
+{
+ struct bpf_program *prog;
+ struct bitops *skel;
+ size_t i;
+ int err;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+ skel = bitops__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bitops__open"))
+ return;
+
+ prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, prog_name);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true);
+
+ err = bitops__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bitops__load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cases); i++) {
+ skel->bss->in_x = cases[i].x;
+ skel->bss->in_s = cases[i].s;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(prog), &topts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "retval"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->out, cases[i].exp, "out");
+ }
+
+cleanup:
+ bitops__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+#define RUN_BITOPS_CASE(_bitops, _prog) \
+ do { \
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cases); i++) \
+ cases[i].exp = _bitops(cases[i].x, cases[i].s); \
+ test_bitops_case(_prog); \
+ } while (0)
+
+static void test_clz64(void)
+{
+ RUN_BITOPS_CASE(clz64, "bitops_clz64");
+}
+
+static void test_ctz64(void)
+{
+ RUN_BITOPS_CASE(ctz64, "bitops_ctz64");
+}
+
+static void test_ffs64(void)
+{
+ RUN_BITOPS_CASE(ffs64, "bitops_ffs64");
+}
+
+static void test_fls64(void)
+{
+ RUN_BITOPS_CASE(fls64, "bitops_fls64");
+}
+
+static void test_bitrev64(void)
+{
+ RUN_BITOPS_CASE(bitrev64, "bitops_bitrev");
+}
+
+static void test_popcnt64(void)
+{
+ RUN_BITOPS_CASE(popcnt64, "bitops_popcnt");
+}
+
+static void test_rol64(void)
+{
+ RUN_BITOPS_CASE(rol64, "bitops_rol64");
+}
+
+static void test_ror64(void)
+{
+ RUN_BITOPS_CASE(ror64, "bitops_ror64");
+}
+
+void test_bitops(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("clz64"))
+ test_clz64();
+ if (test__start_subtest("ctz64"))
+ test_ctz64();
+ if (test__start_subtest("ffs64"))
+ test_ffs64();
+ if (test__start_subtest("fls64"))
+ test_fls64();
+ if (test__start_subtest("bitrev64"))
+ test_bitrev64();
+ if (test__start_subtest("popcnt64"))
+ test_popcnt64();
+ if (test__start_subtest("rol64"))
+ test_rol64();
+ if (test__start_subtest("ror64"))
+ test_ror64();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bitops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bitops.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..deac09bc8683
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bitops.c
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_experimental.h"
+
+__u64 in_x;
+__u64 in_s;
+
+__u64 out;
+
+SEC("?syscall")
+int bitops_clz64(void *ctx)
+{
+ out = bpf_clz64(in_x);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?syscall")
+int bitops_ctz64(void *ctx)
+{
+ out = bpf_ctz64(in_x);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?syscall")
+int bitops_ffs64(void *ctx)
+{
+ out = bpf_ffs64(in_x);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?syscall")
+int bitops_fls64(void *ctx)
+{
+ out = bpf_fls64(in_x);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?syscall")
+int bitops_bitrev(void *ctx)
+{
+ out = bpf_bitrev64(in_x);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?syscall")
+int bitops_popcnt(void *ctx)
+{
+ out = bpf_popcnt64(in_x);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?syscall")
+int bitops_rol64(void *ctx)
+{
+ out = bpf_rol64(in_x, in_s);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?syscall")
+int bitops_ror64(void *ctx)
+{
+ out = bpf_ror64(in_x, in_s);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 14:29 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf: Introduce 64-bit bitops kfuncs Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] " Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 17:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-20 15:34 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-21 9:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-02-21 12:50 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/6] bpf, x86: Add 64-bit bitops kfuncs support for x86_64 Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 17:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-20 15:54 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-20 17:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-21 12:45 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-21 16:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-23 16:35 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 22:05 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-20 14:12 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-20 11:59 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] bpf, arm64: Add 64-bit bitops kfuncs support Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 15:10 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-02-19 15:20 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-02-19 15:25 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-02-19 15:36 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add __cpu_feature annotation for CPU-feature-gated tests Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add JIT disassembly tests for 64-bit bitops kfuncs Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260219142933.13904-5-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luis.gerhorst@fau.de \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yepeilin@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox